Re: [hlds_linux] [english 100%] Re: Counter-Strike: Source Update Available

2009-08-26 Thread Romain Pierre
Hi, OK great. Sorry, I've subscribed to this mailing 2 hours ago. Thank you for the answer. Romain Pierre www.servgame.eu 2009/8/26 Fedot > as Mike Durand sad > >> I've duplicated the problem here and am working on a fix. > > > > yours letter from 27 августа 2009 г., 8:33:24: > -

Re: [hlds_linux] [english 100%] Re: Counter-Strike: Source Update Available

2009-08-26 Thread Fedot
as Mike Durand sad >> I've duplicated the problem here and am working on a fix. yours letter from 27 августа 2009 г., 8:33:24: -- > Hi, > Somebody know if Valve work on it? Or this problem will be postponed for > tomorrow? > Thank you. > Best regards, > Romain Pierre

Re: [hlds_linux] [english 100%] Re: Counter-Strike: Source Update Available

2009-08-26 Thread LinuxMail
They have released a fix, but the update "new fix for the update" is broken aswell. It loads then seg faults. And as far as im aware, valve do not know about this. On 26 August 2009 at 23:06 Kyle Sanderson wrote: > All Linux servers are segfaulting from this update, you have to roll back to > a

Re: [hlds_linux] [english 100%] Re: Counter-Strike: Source Update Available

2009-08-26 Thread Alistair Cockeram
Kyle, this is a new problem not the segfault on launch. We have applied a new patch release since then. On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 02:06:19PM -0700, Kyle Sanderson wrote: > All Linux servers are segfaulting from this update, you have to roll back to > an earlier version until they release a fi

Re: [hlds_linux] [english 100%] Re: Counter-Strike: Source Update Available

2009-08-26 Thread Romain Pierre
Hi, Somebody know if Valve work on it? Or this problem will be postponed for tomorrow? Thank you. Best regards, Romain Pierre 2009/8/26 Kyle Sanderson > All Linux servers are segfaulting from this update, you have to roll back > to > an earlier version until they release a fix which is suppos

Re: [hlds_linux] [english 100%] Re: Counter-Strike: Source Update Available

2009-08-26 Thread Kyle Sanderson
All Linux servers are segfaulting from this update, you have to roll back to an earlier version until they release a fix which is supposed to come out today... Really glad I read the list before I updated, otherwise I would be in your shoes. Kyle. On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Carl wrote: >

Re: [hlds_linux] [english 100%] Re: Counter-Strike: Source Update Available

2009-08-26 Thread Carl
IM getting the same thing. One player joins and the server segfaults. I also noticed the default max players is now 32, has it always been that way? On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Alistair Cockeram wrote: > Currently appear to be on version 73. Servers segfault as soon as a user > joins: >

Re: [hlds_linux] [english 100%] Re: Counter-Strike: Source Update Available

2009-08-26 Thread Alistair Cockeram
Currently appear to be on version 73. Servers segfault as soon as a user joins: L 08/26/2009 - 19:28:57: "Player<2><>" entered the game Segmentation fault (core dumped) Cannot access memory at address 0xf7f76668 Cannot access memory at address 0xf74556b4 /home/$user/PUBLIC-SRCDS/debug.cmds:3: Erro

Re: [hlds_linux] [english 100%] Re: Counter-Strike: Source Update Available

2009-08-26 Thread LinuxMail
Update still doesnt work It said updating from 67 to 70 or something similar, and now it seg faults after adding to master server. Running ubuntu, this happens on both our boxes. srcds is still broken ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences

Re: [hlds_linux] [english 100%] Re: Counter-Strike: Source Update Available

2009-08-26 Thread Andy Wallace
nd Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] [english 100%] Re: Counter-Strike: Source Update Available To: "'Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list'" Date: Wednesday, 26 August, 2009, 7:18 AM I've duplicated the problem here and am working on a fix. -Ori

Re: [hlds_linux] [english 100%] Re: Counter-Strike: Source Update Available

2009-08-26 Thread LinuxMail
ted Linux server mailing list' > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] [english 100%] Re: Counter-Strike: Source Update > Available > > I've duplicated the problem here and am working on a fix. > > -Original Message- > From: hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com

Re: [hlds_linux] [english 100%] Re: Counter-Strike: Source Update Available

2009-08-26 Thread Mike Durand
11:19 PM To: 'Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list' Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] [english 100%] Re: Counter-Strike: Source Update Available I've duplicated the problem here and am working on a fix. -Original Message- From: hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com [ma

Re: [hlds_linux] [english 100%] Re: Counter-Strike: Source Update Available

2009-08-25 Thread Mike Durand
iling list Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] [english 100%] Re: Counter-Strike: Source Update Available Another Debian 5 32bit segfaulting... > Same here Debian 5 64bit > > Joseph Laws schrieb: >> Segfault for me too on Centos 5. >> >> [AF] House of Fail wrote: >> >>

Re: [hlds_linux] [english 100%] Re: Counter-Strike: Source Update Available

2009-08-25 Thread Andrew Armstrong
Linux server mailing list Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] [english 100%] Re: Counter-Strike: Source Update Available Another Debian 5 32bit segfaulting... > Same here Debian 5 64bit > > Joseph Laws schrieb: >> Segfault for me too on Centos 5. >> >> [AF] House of Fail wrote: >&g

Re: [hlds_linux] [english 100%] Re: Counter-Strike: Source Update Available

2009-08-25 Thread Ronny Schedel
Another Debian 5 32bit segfaulting... > Same here Debian 5 64bit > > Joseph Laws schrieb: >> Segfault for me too on Centos 5. >> >> [AF] House of Fail wrote: >> >>> Segfault, first one in all the time I have been running my ubuntu >>> server. >>> No addons active, running 8.04 x86 >>> >>> On Tue,

Re: [hlds_linux] [english 100%] Re: Counter-Strike: Source Update Available

2009-08-25 Thread Philipp Reddigau
Same here Debian 5 64bit Joseph Laws schrieb: > Segfault for me too on Centos 5. > > [AF] House of Fail wrote: > >> Segfault, first one in all the time I have been running my ubuntu server. >> No addons active, running 8.04 x86 >> >> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 8:33 PM, bl4nk wrote: >> >> >>