* James Tucker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051129 04:40]:
> And just to add my "vote" as it were, I would love for
Let sleeping dogs lie.
--
"An investment in knowledge always pays the best interest"
- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
Derek Evan Mart
Systems Administ
And just to add my "vote" as it were, I would love for people to learn
to use mailers like they should.
In fact, screw mailers, try all applications on the planet.
The fact of the matter is "reply" means "reply" not "new mail". This
is the same as reading and using any other application on a logi
Oh come now, he hasn't beaten that dead horse enought yet. He has at
least 50 posts remaining before he gives in.
Crazy_One
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailm
--On Monday, November 28, 2005 1:18 AM -0600 "Eric (Deacon)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There are no high horses, here, only basic requests for decency.
It's too bad this isn't a newsgroup. Then we could killfile entire threads
we find boring, and anyone who insisted on starting a new thread a
and telling him to create a new topic when it
looked to most people that he had.
Dagok
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Forsberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 1:52 AM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Oh no a new subject line!
Dagok wrote:
Obviousl
That's quite the resource you got there. Data sure looks reliable. /sarcasm
Got more out of the plethera of advertising than the hidden arcticle that was
somewhere in there...
/p
Quoting Glenn Shannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Outlook, whether you like it or not, is one of the most popular mail c
Who are you to speak for the majority of people? Regardless of that, the fact
that you won't start a new thread makes finding useful information in the
archives difficult since that is sorted by thread as well. If everyone shared
your inconsiderate mindset, having the archives would eventually b
looked to most people that he had.
Dagok
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Forsberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 1:52 AM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Oh no a new subject line!
Dagok wrote:
Obviously he didnt know when he did it, nor di
. Every
little bit counts, something you think insignificant might be of help to
someone else.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Kennish
Sent: 28 November 2005 14:45
To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Oh no a new
Andrew Forsberg wrote:
I say 'knowingly', since you're also complaining about Eric 'bitching'
about this sort of thing. Ben K in particular has posted on the same
subject many times recently.
Yup it annoys me but thankfully most people are quite apologetic when
they do it and agree not to do it
Outlook, whether you like it or not, is one of the most popular mail clients
in a business environment.
http://advisor.com/doc/16674
65 percent, according to that impromptu survey.
It also has quite a home following, being bundled with things like MS Money
and MS Works.
For better or for worse,
, November 28, 2005 1:37 AM
To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Oh no a new subject line!
Dagok wrote:
> An even smaller effort is not bitching about it everytime someone does
> it.
> It's going to happen and it's not the end of the world nor is it g
*yawn*
Haven't this discussion be going on for too long now?
There are several netiquett sites out there. There are probably some
really interesting netiquett mailinglists for you all to flame instead of
this one...
This is the last line in this thread for me, so don't bother to reply to
it, ca
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
It has to be done correctly for the reasons mentioned. Main thing is a
simple polite "can you next time please start with a fresh mail and not
reply to one and change the topic for archiving reason" should suffice
really.
On 11/28/05, Andrew Fors
Dagok wrote:
Obviously he didnt know when he did it, nor did I until it was pointed
out
in this thread. So how is that knowingly?
My cl_care cvar for this subject is rapidly approaching 0, however --
your and Glenn's point of view appears to be that we should be using
Outlook. This implies th
Obviously he didnt know when he did it, nor did I until it was pointed out
in this thread. So how is that knowingly?
Dagok
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Forsberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 12:36 AM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Oh no a
Dagok wrote:
An even smaller effort is not bitching about it everytime someone does
it.
It's going to happen and it's not the end of the world nor is it going to
have much effect on the mailing lists.
So knowingly stuffing up the threading is somehow defensible? How very
helpful of you.
___
e mailing lists that he doesn't approve of.
Dagok
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Forsberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 12:09 AM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Oh no a new subject line!
Eric (Deacon) wrote:
In a bold display of cr
Eric (Deacon) wrote:
In a bold display of creativity, Dagok wrote:
Majority of people do not view the mailing lists in a threaded view.
Instead they view them as normal emails.
Even assuming this speculation is true, how does that excuse you?
More importantly, these posts are archived and
In a bold display of creativity, Dagok wrote:
Majority of people do not view the mailing lists in a threaded view.
Instead they view them as normal emails.
Even assuming this speculation is true, how does that excuse you?
Because you do view them in a threaded view does not make you special.
Hey Eric, get off your high horse and open your eyes.
Majority of people do not view the mailing lists in a threaded view. Instead
they view them as normal emails.
Because you do view them in a threaded view does not make you special. Now
get over it and move on.
Dagok
- Original Message
21 matches
Mail list logo
