On 11/09/2014 04:43, Brian Haberman wrote:
>
> On 9/10/14 11:51 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
>>
>>> My point was the even if this draft is accepted by 6MAN, standardized,
>>> and even implemented some day, it doesn’t satisfy the HOMENET
>>> multi-
On Sep 10, 2014, at 12:43 PM, Brian Haberman wrote:
>
>
> On 9/10/14 11:51 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
>>
>>> My point was the even if this draft is accepted by 6MAN, standardized,
>>> and even implemented some day, it doesn’t satisfy the HO
On 9/10/14 11:51 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
>
>> My point was the even if this draft is accepted by 6MAN, standardized,
>> and even implemented some day, it doesn’t satisfy the HOMENET
>> multi-homed routing requirement.
>
> I don't get it. Co
On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
My point was the even if this draft is accepted by 6MAN, standardized,
and even implemented some day, it doesn’t satisfy the HOMENET
multi-homed routing requirement.
I don't get it. Could you please be more elaborate?
--
Mikael Abrahamssonem
On Sep 10, 2014, at 11:26 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
>
>> I’ve heard it said over and over in HOMENET sessions that we weren’t going
>> to put new requirements on the host stacks. Why is this draft interesting?
>
> HOMENET doesn't require ne
On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
I’ve heard it said over and over in HOMENET sessions that we weren’t
going to put new requirements on the host stacks. Why is this draft
interesting?
HOMENET doesn't require new host stack functionality. What part of the
draft makes you think th
On Sep 10, 2014, at 8:42 AM, Ray Bellis
mailto:ray.bel...@nominet.org.uk>> wrote:
I've just noticed this draft, and thought it worth bringing to the HOMENET WG's
attention:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sarikaya-6man-sadr-overview-00
I’ve heard it said over and over in HOMENET sessions that
On 10 Sep 2014, at 15:48, Juliusz Chroboczek
wrote:
> Perhaps it's worth delaying the discussion about promoting these to WG
> status until after you publish the next version, then?
No, we're discussing them now.
Drafts are neither expected nor required to be fully mature before WG adoption.
I've just noticed this draft, and thought it worth bringing to the HOMENET WG's
attention:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sarikaya-6man-sadr-overview-00
Ray
___
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
Hi,
Please see my responses in line.
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek <
j...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> > - the architecture document describes how to outsource DNS zone
> outside
> > the home network to any third party by re-using only existing
> st
10 matches
Mail list logo
