In a message dated 4/11/2006 10:46:19 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Universities that don't place graduates in jobs don't stay in business long.
If your place of employment cares about zSeries skills, it is important
to make that known to local colleges and universiti
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
>Other than being line mode, TSO EDIT is a *lot* more user friendly
>than vi. But if you're working on multiple Unix systems, it's useful
>to know an editor that will always be there.
>
>Then there are the people who actually like the thing. De
Blue Peter badges to Dave and Tom. It was a cock-up with the ISPTLIB
concatenation.
Thanks chaps.
Jim McAlpine
On 4/11/06, Thomas Conley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm configuring File Manager for DB2 and I want to remove a particular
> > option from a panel so some users can't see it.
In a message dated 4/12/2006 8:24:30 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In this case, two jobs are submitted simultaneously. We use
CA-Scheduler for production and other test job streams. I thought that
a scheduler was included with the operating system, but I am just a
>Actually I suspected it but some bosses were scared about having so many sms
>volumes with PAVs.
SMS and PAV's are not connected (yet).
PAV's are based on device activity and I/O queuing.
Devices that are not SMS managed are still eligible for PAV's (EG: SPOOL).
And, you can (through the IODF)
Hi Kees
Actually I suspected it but some bosses were scared about having so many
sms volumes with PAVs.
Having many volumes defined tgo SMS even if not 'real' volumes gives me
more flexibility in managing space shortages.
Thank you very much
MAx Scarpa
Db2 sysprog
-
Workload Manager allows for the definitions of "scheduling environments."
If you were to use JES2 (or JES3, I suppose) to issue MODIFY commands to the
WLM address space at particular times of the day to set the resource values,
you could create some semblance of a job scheduler. It does require yo
Page six of the referenced link, left side, bulleted item:
IBM currently intends to deliver the following items for
WebSphere Application Server for z/OS, V6.1 in a post
GA timeframe:
- 64-bit enablement for WebSphere Application
Server for z/OS
- A Web server for z/OS, powered by Apache for use
w
One of the things I do for test purposes is use the following JCL at the
end of the job:
//STARTER EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01,DYNAMNBR=25,COND=(4,LT)
//SYSABEND DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSTSPRT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSTSIN DD *
"Eliminated." Heh. They couldn't resist it.
Jon
IBM has quietly eliminated a patent it received on a method for determining
who gets to use the bathroom next.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructio
Yeha, that works on my Intel Linux systems, but on my VM-hosted ones, if things
are that broken, then I'm probably in 3270 mode and even "vi" doesn't work;
that's when I find myself trying to remember how to use "ed."
Jon
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/support/zos_eos_dates.
html
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Raymond J. Slisz
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 8:57 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: [IBM-MAIN] z/OS 1.6 End of
I´m afraid not, because it has not been announced yet.
Have a look at
http://www-306.ibm.com/software/info/supportlifecycle/index.html
"Raymond J. Slisz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Verzonden door: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
12-04-2006 14:57
Antwoord a.u.b. aan
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Aa
Last I saw, last column is service discontinued.
z/OS
Program Marketing Service
number VRMAnnounced Available withdrawn discontinued
5694-A01 1.07.0 2005/07/27 2005/09/30 2006/09* 2008/09*
5694-A01 1.06.0 2004/08/10 2004/09/24 2005/10/24 2007/09*
569
Could someone please inform me as to the end of support date for
z/OS 1.6 ??
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archive
I have been reading IBM-Main off and on for awhile and one of the
reoccurring concerns
is, of course, the phasing out of the mainframe at various shops. There
is one aspect of
this that, I think, has not been emphasized. This aspect was pointed out
in recent Wall
Street Journal column titled, 'Ap
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rashmi Nijaguni Mogali
> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 1:17 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Job scheduling
>
> Hi,
>
> I need to schedule the execution of 26 jobs.
>
> This has
our sysprogs discourage (prevent?) 0M on the belief (fact?) that if such a
job were to run-away and consume all available memoryon its way to
ebending, there would be no room to set up abend-related control blocks in
memory when it did abend - thus we are constrained to use 2047M
Chris Hoelsc
Timothy,
I don't see the SOD re: Apache in the referenced announcement. Can
you provide a link?
Thanks,
Kirk Wolf
On 4/11/06, Timothy Sipples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Version 6.1 announced today. Details here:
>
> http://www.ibm.com/common/ssi/rep_ca/7/897/ENUS206-077/ENUS206-077.PDF
>
> G
Hi All,
We are having discisisons regarding an optimal region size for our
"standard" batch processing.
Currently, we use region=0M for all of our batch jobs without any noticeable
problems.
Is this subparm useful anymore? it would appear that our system does not
care too much, but i am concerne
A. Harry Williams wrote:
Let's see if I can get this past Darren's filters this time.
From: "A. Harry Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Marist College
Subject: Re: Kudos to IBM's promotion
X-LSVline1: On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 07:42:40 -0500 Mohammad Khan said:
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 07:4
Rashmi Nijaguni Mogali wrote:
Hi,
I need to schedule the execution of 26 jobs.
This has to happen such that the 2nd job should start after the
successful execution of the 1st job, the 3rd after the 2nd and so on.
Moreover the output of 1st job is the input to the 2nd job.
How do I accompli
Really Jim?
You surprise me.
BTW, Release 40 of REVIEW should be out in a week or two.
:)
GP
Jim Marshall wrote:
Snippage.
> You can thank Bill Godfrey for getting everyone
> started in many more utlities besides LISTPDS.
>
> Jim Marshall
-
The 'SEARCH ALL' APARs PK15432 and PK16765 have closed with PTFs
available.
Best Regards,
Sam Knutson, GEICO
Performance and Availability Management
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(office) 301.986.3574
IBM: I Bring Madness
On 10 Apr 2006 10:33:57 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ed Gould) wrote:
>> much snipped
>
>I believe in the context of the original writer that the JES exit(s)
>were either complex or change was needed to accommodate the change in
>JES2 levels. Some one spoke about the mana
On 11 Apr 2006 04:49:30 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Timothy Sipples) wrote:
>Version 6.1 announced today. Details here:
>
>http://www.ibm.com/common/ssi/rep_ca/7/897/ENUS206-077/ENUS206-077.PDF
>
>GA date is June 30, 2006. I'm still quickly reading through the
>announceme
On 9 Apr 2006 12:40:06 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Gilmartin) wrote:
>On Sun, 9 Apr 2006 11:43:35 -0500, Sebastian Welton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 8 Apr 2006 09:13:43 -0400, Aaron Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
>> >reasonably competent with Perl, and I ha
>Print is *not* what it does.
These arguments would be more interesting if you read my post(s).
I originally said:
"cat -- list ..."
Where was the word PRINT?
-
-teD
O-KAY! BLUE! JAYS!
Let's PLAY! BALL!
--
For IBM-MAIN subsc
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Esteemed listers
>
> I'd like to modify our Storage Groups structure to react quickly if the SG
> is in shortage of space.
>
> We want to create some SG with many volumes (say 100) defined but only few
> (say 20) having a real DAS
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 04/11/2006
at 09:43 AM, "(IBM Mainframe Discussion List)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
>I also believe that VSAM uses EXCPVR,
AFAIK it uses STARTIO, which has a shorter path length than EXCP or
even EXCPVR.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 04/12/2006
at 08:14 AM, Shane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I place it right up there with the TSO line mode edit command - when
>you have a *really* broken install, you need a tool of last resort.
Other than being line mode, TSO EDIT is a *lot* more user friendly
than
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 04/11/2006
at 12:00 AM, Ted MacNEIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I was giving 'reasonable' substitutes, ie: what it does.
Print is *not* what it does. It catenates its inputs into standard
output, and in this case standard output was a pipe. The function of
that cat wa
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 04/11/2006
at 11:55 AM, Cathy Taddei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Aaron, I don't post here often, but I want you to know that z/OS
>Sysprogging is not a world of men with grey beards and hairy chests.
> Although we are definitely in the minority, there are plenty of
>
Esteemed listers
I'd like to modify our Storage Groups structure to react quickly if the SG
is in shortage of space.
We want to create some SG with many volumes (say 100) defined but only few
(say 20) having a real DASD allocated, the other should be only entries in
SG. I did it in other shops wi
Ted,
A general technique I have used successfully to estimate the CPU usage (or
instruction path length) of a "black box" piece of code is as follows:
(1) Measure the resource usage of the standard job - call this R1
(2) Modify the job (in the case your COBOL program) to call the "black box"
s
Hi Lizette,
Your right.. i think it's due to my inexperience in Z/OS.
The answers are
1. Z/OS 1.4
2. RACF
3. I must test a control that says: "Ensure that the creation / deletion of
all system objects is logged."
Until now I consider datasets and TCP connections, for both "systems
objects" I've
101 - 136 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
