Agreed.Thanks all for your input.
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Rob van der Heij
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 4:29 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: PROP RTABLE and
We currently have a functioning VSWITCH, LNXVSW1, related to a VSWITCH
controller, DTCVSW2 at OSA 9004.
Q VSWITCH
09:14:01 VSWITCH SYSTEM LNXVSW1 Type: VSWITCH Connected: 3Maxconn:
INFINITE
09:14:01 PERSISTENT RESTRICTEDNONROUTER Accounting:
OFF
09:14:01 VLAN
If you have supporting hardware, you can potentially get better throughput with link
aggregation.
But, using your method just define the new Vswitch. You do not need to 'attach'
anything, CP handles the device mechanics. Depending upon how much traffic you are
pumping through the OSA on D4
On Thursday, 09/09/2010 at 09:42 EDT, George Henke/NYLIC
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:
We currently have a functioning VSWITCH, LNXVSW1, related to a VSWITCH
controller, DTCVSW2 at OSA 9004.
We are trying to understand how LNXVSW1 is related to the VSWITCH
controller,
DTCVSW2 so
Hi,
I just got the same problem today. Never had before...
I am in zVM530 rsu 1001 and I would like to know if a ptf was brought in
a rsu ?
Alain
Dear George,
I see in your 'Query OSA' that the address 9005 is now attached to DTCVSW2.
If you need a second VSWITCH, you must use a free OSA-Address (maybe 9007
is free). You can dynamically define your VSWITCH (e.g. in Userid Maint)
and attatch him to your Linux-System, before you put this in
