Re: WinCvs users - query - 1st summary attempt

2000-05-25 Thread Win32 M$
Hi Mark, >Why are we having a button for launching an editor again? It is NOT, I repeat: IT IS NOT OBLIGATORY TO PUSH THE BUTTON :) The button is there, but you can use your other editor already open or whatever. Just ignore the button! The point of the change is to: 1. Get rid of some odditie

Re: WinCvs users - query - 1st summary attempt

2000-05-25 Thread Mark Derricutt
On Thu, 25 May 2000, Win32 M$ wrote: > dialog with caret info + button to lauch the editor should keep everybody > happy. Once you have the r-click cut/copy/paste menu back it should be > fairly easy to make your log message looking the way you like. In any case Why are we having a button for la

Re: WinCvs users - query - 1st summary attempt

2000-05-24 Thread Win32 M$
Hi All, OK, here is as I see it: 1. 60 chars - NO GO (see below) 2. 80 chars - NO GO (see above) 3. Non-proportional fonts, fonts choice, second dialog with Curier etc. - no go. This is bloat. 4. To keep (1) and (2) quasi solved: Caret position box - watch your limits by yourself! 5. To have (3)

Re: WinCvs users - query

2000-05-24 Thread Rich Salz
> > Formatting is not stored anyway, so there is nothing to feel sorry about. Being able to write ChangeLog in HTML woul be useful.

Re: WinCvs users - query

2000-05-24 Thread Mark Derricutt
On Wed, 24 May 2000, Win32 M$ wrote: > with the standard edit box (multiline). The only difference that it > makes would be that: If you do change it PLEASE make it use Courier New 10pt (of whatever is selected for use in the log window, and make it bigger, so that I one could fit 80 columns of

Re: WinCvs users - query

2000-05-24 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On Wed, 24 May 2000, Win32 M$ wrote: The change is a good idea, but: > OK, what if: > 1. Quick solution: > I put one more button on this dialog, and then if clicked it would open > another dialog with the fonts set to let's say "Courier New 10" and the edit > box to enter the message only. After

Re: WinCvs users - query

2000-05-24 Thread Win32 M$
Hi Harald, OK, what if: 1. Quick solution: I put one more button on this dialog, and then if clicked it would open another dialog with the fonts set to let's say "Courier New 10" and the edit box to enter the message only. After OK on the second dialog the message would be put back in the commit

Re: WinCvs users - query

2000-05-24 Thread Tony Hoyle
"Win32 M$" wrote: > > Hi All, > > I want to get your opinions regarding the "Commit settings" dialog. > Edit controls are problematic on Win95/98 since they are implemented in 16 bit, and are subject to the internal 64K resource limitation. You should get away with it provided there aren't to

Re: WinCvs users - query

2000-05-24 Thread Harald Kucharek
"Win32 M$" wrote: > > Hi All, > > I want to get your opinions regarding the "Commit settings" dialog. > 3. No formatting visible - the whole thing in B/W, Ms Sans Serif(default > font for dialogs). Formatting is not stored anyway, so there is nothing to > feel sorry about. > > Any opinions? I

WinCvs users - query

2000-05-24 Thread Win32 M$
Hi All, I want to get your opinions regarding the "Commit settings" dialog. This dialog is using the RichEdit control for entering the log message. The problem with RichEdit is that it is quite buggy(selections and such), and it doesn't supply the Right-click menu for CutCopyPaste. I want to r