> On Thu, 07 Jun 2001 20:45:22 -0400,
> Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (km) writes:
km> I took a look at this and it IS doable (I actually hacked some code),
km> but it makes the LIST/LSUB code uglier than it already is. For this
km> reason, and the fact that Larry and I both feel tha
Ken Murchison wrote:
>
> John Holman wrote:
> >
> > Ken
> >
> > I do have one query though. Since personal folders and INBOX now exist at
> > the same level for the logged-in user
> > I had expected the same to be true also for "Other Users" - e.g. there
> > might be mailboxes
> >
> > Other Use
John Holman wrote:
>
> Ken
>
> I do have one query though. Since personal folders and INBOX now exist at
> the same level for the logged-in user
> I had expected the same to be true also for "Other Users" - e.g. there
> might be mailboxes
>
> Other Users.Mike.INBOX
> Other Users.Mike.Saved
>
Ken
(Message sent a few days ago but I don't think it got through).
The alternate namespace looks like a very useful enhancement that should
avoid problems with the many clients that
assume too much about what the namespace should be. I think it's also much
more in line with what users expect.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> From: "Tarjei Huse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >Hi,
> >> >One point that I failed to mention is that subfolders of INBOX are _NOT_
> >> >permitted when using the alternate namespace (subfolders of other
> >> >personal folders are allowed). This sacrifice had to be m
From: "Tarjei Huse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Hi,
>> >One point that I failed to mention is that subfolders of INBOX are _NOT_
>> >permitted when using the alternate namespace (subfolders of other
>> >personal folders are allowed). This sacrifice had to be made in order
>> >to preserve the existin
Hi,
> >One point that I failed to mention is that subfolders of INBOX are _NOT_
> >permitted when using the alternate namespace (subfolders of other
> >personal folders are allowed). This sacrifice had to be made in order
> >to preserve the existing mailstore structure.
I have no problem with thi
From: Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> From: Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >
>> >I am pleased to announce the availability of an alternate namespace for
>> >Cyrus IMAP which allows personal folders to reside at the same
>> >[top]level as the INBOX. You
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> From: Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >I am pleased to announce the availability of an alternate namespace for
> >Cyrus IMAP which allows personal folders to reside at the same
> >[top]level as the INBOX. You should consider this code to be late-beta,
> >
>
From: Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>I am pleased to announce the availability of an alternate namespace for
>Cyrus IMAP which allows personal folders to reside at the same
>[top]level as the INBOX. You should consider this code to be late-beta,
>
I encourage people to check this out, an
I am pleased to announce the availability of an alternate namespace for
Cyrus IMAP which allows personal folders to reside at the same
[top]level as the INBOX. You should consider this code to be late-beta,
but it is fully functional and appears to be as stable as 2.0.14. I
have been running thi
11 matches
Mail list logo
