Re: [PHP-DEV] Regarding constructions like func()[0]

2009-11-09 Thread Lukas Kahwe Smith
On 09.11.2009, at 18:46, jvlad wrote: I have filed a bug (suggestion) at http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=50003 What do you think about enabling such a constructions in future versions of php? On Nov 9, 2009, at 1:41 AM, David Zülke wrote: It's already on the list for PHP6: http://wiki.php.n

Re: [PHP-DEV] Regarding constructions like func()[0]

2009-11-09 Thread jvlad
>>> I have filed a bug (suggestion) at http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=50003 >>> What do you think about enabling such a constructions in future >>> versions of >>> php? >>On Nov 9, 2009, at 1:41 AM, David Zülke wrote: >> It's already on the list for PHP6: >> >> http://wiki.php.net/summits/pdmnot

Re: [PHP-DEV] Regarding constructions like func()[0]

2009-11-09 Thread Philip Olson
On 07.11.2009, at 12:42, melfar wrote: Hello! I have filed a bug (suggestion) at http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=50003 What do you think about enabling such a constructions in future versions of php? On Nov 9, 2009, at 1:41 AM, David Zülke wrote: It's already on the list for PHP6: http:

[PHP-DEV] PHP 6 Bug Summary Report

2009-11-09 Thread internals
PHP 6 Bug Database summary - http://bugs.php.net/ Num Status Summary (105 total -- which includes 46 feature requests) ===[*Compile Issues]== 49270 Open configure fails if PHP source folder path contains spaces 50101 Open [P

Re: [PHP-DEV] Regarding constructions like func()[0]

2009-11-09 Thread David Zülke
It's already on the list for PHP6: http://wiki.php.net/summits/pdmnotesmay09 (see Day 2, PHP 6, #13). No need to discuss this further, I think. You might also want to have that bug closed, it's redundant. - David On 07.11.2009, at 12:42, melfar wrote: Hello! I have filed a bug (suggest

Re: [PHP-DEV] Regarding constructions like func()[0]

2009-11-09 Thread jvlad
>> If you care not to waste userland with new names, use namespaces, >> that's the way intruduced by php, and it is not javascript after all. >> >> > > I'm so old school in my coding, I've not got my head around namespaces > yet. I'm just old. > There is nothing really "new" in namespaces. For exam