Hi,
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 7:53 AM, Sara Golemon wrote:
> Just for casual discussion at this point:
> https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/3297
>
> switch ($a) {
> case FOO:
> // Works exactly as current behavior.
> break;
> case == FOO:
> // Nearly identical, though not usin
Just for casual discussion at this point:
https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/3297
switch ($a) {
case FOO:
// Works exactly as current behavior.
break;
case == FOO:
// Nearly identical, though not using the ZEND_CASE optimization.
// Can probably make this equivalent to `
Hi!
> That said, in my opinion it is too late for 7.3 to move a bundled
> extension to PECL, except perhaps for unresolved or even unresolvable
> security reasons. ext/wddx comes to mind, and maybe there are others.
I'd be happy to move wddx if nobody steps up to maintain it. It has tons
of secu
On 12.06.2018 at 22:09, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> Yes, I think having some rules on maintainership would be nice, right
> now I haven't even considered extensions which have maintainers listed
> but no longer active, etc. - though I suspect those exist too. […]
>From looking at current EXTENSIO
On 13.06.2018 at 21:26, Enno Woortmann wrote:
> I've changed the status of the currently introduced RFC to add the
> functions array_key_first() and array_key_last() to "Under Discussion".
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/array_key_first_last
Thanks for working on this, Enno!
I suggest to address C
On 13.06.2018 at 16:48, Sara Golemon wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 4:09 PM, Stanislav Malyshev
> wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure it's too late for 7.3. If we see that the extension is
>> unmaintained, we could move it out for 7.3 I think.
>
> Well, you and cmb are the RMs for 7.3, so you get the lar
On 12.06.2018 at 23:33, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
>>> I'm afraid this might be misused. It's too easy to update the year
>>> number, without actually doing *any* real maintenance work (“I'll come
>>> back to that later” …). Some automated process would be nice, but
>>> manually checking the bug
Hello internals,
I've changed the status of the currently introduced RFC to add the
functions array_key_first() and array_key_last() to "Under Discussion".
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/array_key_first_last
Regards,
Enno
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, v
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 4:09 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> I'm not sure it's too late for 7.3. If we see that the extension is
> unmaintained, we could move it out for 7.3 I think.
>
Well, you and cmb are the RMs for 7.3, so you get the largest say in
that, but IMO we won't finish sorting out th
On Jun 10, 2018 10:46 PM, "Hoffman, Zachary Robert" wrote:
>The existence of anything that internally relies on `get_defined_vars()` is a
>blocker for applying further optimisations to the engine (think stack frames),
>which is probably why Dmitry suggested its removal.
I did not know it was an
10 matches
Mail list logo