[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16256) Purpose of EnvironmentEdge, EnvironmentEdgeManager

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-16256: -- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Sai Teja Ranuva Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Fix Version/s: 1.1.7

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16270) When using region replicas, get thousands of occurrences of UnexpectedStateException: Current snapshot id is -1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15400245#comment-15400245 ] stack commented on HBASE-16270: --- [~mbertozzi] This looks good to me. To you? > When using

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16186) Fix AssignmentManager MBean name

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-16186: -- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Incompatible change,Reviewed Release Note: The AssignmentManager MBean

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16285) Drop RPC requests if it must be considered as timeout at client

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15400257#comment-15400257 ] stack commented on HBASE-16285: --- On EnvironmentEdge, see the patch just committed at HBASE

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14743) Add metrics around HeapMemoryManager

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15400264#comment-15400264 ] stack commented on HBASE-14743: --- A release note would be here. You 'Edit' this issue. You'l

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16196) Update jruby to a newer version.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16196?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15400279#comment-15400279 ] stack commented on HBASE-16196: --- We know why the hadoop failures? I tried the patch. Still

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15756) Pluggable RpcServer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15756?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15400712#comment-15400712 ] stack commented on HBASE-15756: --- Change it to what? I have 24 * 8 * 32 clients running agai

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15756) Pluggable RpcServer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15756?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15400713#comment-15400713 ] stack commented on HBASE-15756: --- Yes. It is the same as we have except in regard to respons

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15756) Pluggable RpcServer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15756?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15400715#comment-15400715 ] stack commented on HBASE-15756: --- We'll have to dig. We need to have Netty make use of [~ano

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9899) for idempotent operation dups, return the result instead of throwing conflict exception

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-9899: - Release Note: Non-idempotent operations (increment/append/checkAndPut/...) may throw OperationConflictException e

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16234) Expect and handle nulls when assigning replicas

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15400721#comment-15400721 ] stack commented on HBASE-16234: --- I think the newly added coded repeats; better it doesn't.

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15756) Pluggable RpcServer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15756?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15400929#comment-15400929 ] stack commented on HBASE-15756: --- I have defaults which is ten columns with value of 128 byt

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-16308) Contain protobuf references

stack created HBASE-16308: - Summary: Contain protobuf references Key: HBASE-16308 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308 Project: HBase Issue Type: Sub-task Components: Prot

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16308) Contain protobuf references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-16308: -- Attachment: HBASE-16308.master.001.patch > Contain protobuf references > --- > >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16308) Contain protobuf references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15401445#comment-15401445 ] stack commented on HBASE-16308: --- Uploaded a partially done patch. Patch includes refactor o

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15756) Pluggable RpcServer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15756?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15401512#comment-15401512 ] stack commented on HBASE-15756: --- Thanks [~aoxiang] Will try it in morning boss. > Pluggabl

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9899) for idempotent operation dups, return the result instead of throwing conflict exception

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15401518#comment-15401518 ] stack commented on HBASE-9899: -- Is the failure related? The hadoop build failures can't be re

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16327) Unify BufferChain and MultiByteBuff

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15404522#comment-15404522 ] stack commented on HBASE-16327: --- +1 Whats the differences? > Unify BufferChain and MultiB

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16340) ensure no Xerces jars included

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15404527#comment-15404527 ] stack commented on HBASE-16340: --- +1 What those failures about? > ensure no Xerces jars in

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16335) update to latest apache parent pom

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15404529#comment-15404529 ] stack commented on HBASE-16335: --- +1 > update to latest apache parent pom > ---

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16334) upgrade NekoHTML to latest or replace

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15404531#comment-15404531 ] stack commented on HBASE-16334: --- This even used? > upgrade NekoHTML to latest or replace >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16332) update LMAX disruptor to latest

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16332?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15404533#comment-15404533 ] stack commented on HBASE-16332: --- +1 I looked at this recently but few changes since our ver

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16331) update Guice to 4.1+

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15404534#comment-15404534 ] stack commented on HBASE-16331: --- What [~ndimiduk] said > update Guice to 4.1+ > --

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-16341) Missing bit on "Regression: Random Read/WorkloadC slower in 1.x than 0.98"

stack created HBASE-16341: - Summary: Missing bit on "Regression: Random Read/WorkloadC slower in 1.x than 0.98" Key: HBASE-16341 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16341 Project: HBase

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16341) Missing bit on "Regression: Random Read/WorkloadC slower in 1.x than 0.98"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-16341: -- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Missing bit on "Regression: Random Read/WorkloadC slower in 1.x than 0.9

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16341) Missing bit on "Regression: Random Read/WorkloadC slower in 1.x than 0.98"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-16341: -- Attachment: HBASE-16341.patch Small fix. > Missing bit on "Regression: Random Read/WorkloadC slower in 1.x tha

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16308) Contain protobuf references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-16308: -- Attachment: HBASE-16308.master.002.patch > Contain protobuf references > --- > >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16308) Contain protobuf references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-16308: -- Attachment: HBASE-16308.master.003.patch > Contain protobuf references > --- > >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16308) Contain protobuf references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-16308: -- Attachment: HBASE-16308.master.004.patch > Contain protobuf references > --- > >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16341) Missing bit on "Regression: Random Read/WorkloadC slower in 1.x than 0.98"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-16341: -- Attachment: HBASE-16341.patch Retry even though this patch has nothing to do w/ failures setting a default tha

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16308) Contain protobuf references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-16308: -- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Contain protobuf references > --- > >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-15756) Pluggable RpcServer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15756?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-15756: -- Attachment: gc.png gets.png Here are a few graphs [~aoxiang] As is, we are slower ... 120k vs

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16327) Unify BufferChain and MultiByteBuff

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15407203#comment-15407203 ] stack commented on HBASE-16327: --- I thought they were doing the same thing but after seeing

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16308) Contain protobuf references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-16308: -- Attachment: HBASE-16308.master.005.patch > Contain protobuf references > --- > >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16308) Contain protobuf references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15407229#comment-15407229 ] stack commented on HBASE-16308: --- Fix findbugs and fix that should take care of failing test

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16299) Update REST API scanner with ability to do reverse scan

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-16299: -- Assignee: Minwoo Kang > Update REST API scanner with ability to do reverse scan > -

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16299) Update REST API scanner with ability to do reverse scan

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15407235#comment-15407235 ] stack commented on HBASE-16299: --- I added [~minwoo.kang] to contributors and assigned him th

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15756) Pluggable RpcServer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15756?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15407240#comment-15407240 ] stack commented on HBASE-15756: --- Thank you for fast turnaround [~aoxiang]. I'm pretty sure

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12721) Create Docker container cluster infrastructure to enable better testing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15407250#comment-15407250 ] stack commented on HBASE-12721: --- Sounds good to me as a stopgap to get this project moving

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15554) StoreFile$Writer.appendGeneralBloomFilter generates extra KV

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15407934#comment-15407934 ] stack commented on HBASE-15554: --- Nice [~ram_krish] Skimming, looks good. What about import

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16308) Contain protobuf references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-16308: -- Attachment: HBASE-16308.master.006.patch > Contain protobuf references > --- > >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16308) Contain protobuf references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15407973#comment-15407973 ] stack commented on HBASE-16308: --- The TestLogLevel failure is because httpserver did not dep

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16308) Contain protobuf references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15408194#comment-15408194 ] stack commented on HBASE-16308: --- This is interesting failure: Caused by: java.lang.ClassNo

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16308) Contain protobuf references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15408204#comment-15408204 ] stack commented on HBASE-16308: --- Stuff passes locally of course. It started failing for all

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16308) Contain protobuf references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-16308: -- Attachment: HBASE-16308.master.006.patch Retry though it looks like TestLogLevel is just broke for all, not rel

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-15756) Pluggable RpcServer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15756?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-15756: -- Attachment: patched.vs.patched_and_cached.vs.no_patch.png Thanks for the patch [~aoxiang] (I didn't realize it

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15554) StoreFile$Writer.appendGeneralBloomFilter generates extra KV

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15408372#comment-15408372 ] stack commented on HBASE-15554: --- I think TestLogLevel is broke... not by you. You think we

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9899) for idempotent operation dups, return the result instead of throwing conflict exception

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15408377#comment-15408377 ] stack commented on HBASE-9899: -- Sorry [~zghaobac] This is a great patch. Very nice. I pushed

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9899) for idempotent operation dups, return the result instead of throwing conflict exception

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-9899: - Fix Version/s: 2.0.0 > for idempotent operation dups, return the result instead of throwing conflict > exception

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16308) Contain protobuf references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15408423#comment-15408423 ] stack commented on HBASE-16308: --- Yeah, TestLogLevel is unrelated. Reviews? You good w/ this

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15756) Pluggable RpcServer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15756?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15408816#comment-15408816 ] stack commented on HBASE-15756: --- Yeah, unpatched 400k and the patched does 300k. I played w

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16360) TableMapReduceUtil addHBaseDependencyJars has the wrong class name for PrefixTreeCodec

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15408856#comment-15408856 ] stack commented on HBASE-16360: --- [~jimpu] Try now. I added you as a contributor. > TableMa

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-16361) Revert of HBASE-16317, "revert all ESAPI..." broke TestLogLevel

stack created HBASE-16361: - Summary: Revert of HBASE-16317, "revert all ESAPI..." broke TestLogLevel Key: HBASE-16361 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16361 Project: HBase Issue Type

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15756) Pluggable RpcServer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15756?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15408881#comment-15408881 ] stack commented on HBASE-15756: --- Hmm... I upped the worker thread count from 6 to 12 and th

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15756) Pluggable RpcServer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15756?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15409574#comment-15409574 ] stack commented on HBASE-15756: --- [~anoop.hbase] It is the two patches [~aoxiang] says above

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15756) Pluggable RpcServer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15756?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15409578#comment-15409578 ] stack commented on HBASE-15756: --- [~aoxiang] Have you seen an issue around server shutdown?

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16340) ensure no Xerces jars included

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15409674#comment-15409674 ] stack commented on HBASE-16340: --- Yes sir > ensure no Xerces jars included > --

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16308) Contain protobuf references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-16308: -- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Fix Version/s: 2.0.0 Status: Resolved (was: Pat

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9899) for idempotent operation dups, return the result instead of throwing conflict exception

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15409778#comment-15409778 ] stack commented on HBASE-9899: -- Thank you [~zghaobac] Lets see what happens when qa build run

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16361) Revert of HBASE-16317, "revert all ESAPI..." broke TestLogLevel

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15410025#comment-15410025 ] stack commented on HBASE-16361: --- No worries [~ndimiduk] Let me figure it out. It is not the

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16308) Contain protobuf references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15410176#comment-15410176 ] stack commented on HBASE-16308: --- Sorry about that [~apurtell]. Let me revert till I figure

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15756) Pluggable RpcServer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15756?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15410412#comment-15410412 ] stack commented on HBASE-15756: --- Testing today, the results are less conclusive. I can do a

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9899) for idempotent operation dups, return the result instead of throwing conflict exception

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15410469#comment-15410469 ] stack commented on HBASE-9899: -- Thanks > for idempotent operation dups, return the result in

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-16263) Move all to do w/ protobuf -- *.proto files and generated classes -- under hbase-protocol

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack resolved HBASE-16263. --- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Fix Version/s: 2.0.0 Committed. Resolving. > Move all t

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16264) Figure how to deal with endpoints and shaded pb

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15410500#comment-15410500 ] stack commented on HBASE-16264: --- Learnings: # We have a few Coprocessor Endpoints (CPEP)

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16361) Revert of HBASE-16317, "revert all ESAPI..." broke TestLogLevel

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15410509#comment-15410509 ] stack commented on HBASE-16361: --- The classnotfound is looking for URIException. URIExcepti

[jira] [Reopened] (HBASE-16267) Remove commons-httpclient dependency from hbase-rest module

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack reopened HBASE-16267: --- Reopening. This commit removes the URIException that the TestLogLevel failure is complaining as missing. This pa

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16361) Revert of HBASE-16317, "revert all ESAPI..." broke TestLogLevel

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15410644#comment-15410644 ] stack commented on HBASE-16361: --- Added note on HBASE-16267 that intend to revert unless fix

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16267) Remove commons-httpclient dependency from hbase-rest module

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15410645#comment-15410645 ] stack commented on HBASE-16267: --- Oh, this issue also needs a release note. It does more tha

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16267) Remove commons-httpclient dependency from hbase-rest module

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15410664#comment-15410664 ] stack commented on HBASE-16267: --- What is this issue trying to fix? > Remove commons-httpcl

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16264) Figure how to deal with endpoints and shaded pb

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15410671#comment-15410671 ] stack commented on HBASE-16264: --- At the moment having copies of base HBase Protos so corps

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16267) Remove commons-httpclient dependency from hbase-rest module

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15410729#comment-15410729 ] stack commented on HBASE-16267: --- Ok. It doesn't say that in subject. Sounds important to fi

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16359) NullPointerException in RSRpcServices.openRegion()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15410737#comment-15410737 ] stack commented on HBASE-16359: --- Commits that have this as commit message "4b3e45f HBASE-16

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9899) for idempotent operation dups, return the result instead of throwing conflict exception

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-9899: - Attachment: HBASE-9899-branch-1.patch Retry. See if TestAcidGuarantees failure is related. > for idempotent opera

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16308) Contain protobuf references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-16308: -- Attachment: HBASE-16308.master.007.patch > Contain protobuf references > --- > >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16308) Contain protobuf references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15411107#comment-15411107 ] stack commented on HBASE-16308: --- New patch fixes the increment nonce issue. The test is new

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16308) Contain protobuf references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-16308: -- Status: Patch Available (was: Reopened) > Contain protobuf references > --- > >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16264) Figure how to deal with endpoints and shaded pb

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15411910#comment-15411910 ] stack commented on HBASE-16264: --- Sorry, copies.. So a CPEP is standalone, doesn't depend on

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16308) Contain protobuf references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15411913#comment-15411913 ] stack commented on HBASE-16308: --- That'd be great [~zghaobac]. In next version of this patch

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16308) Contain protobuf references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-16308: -- Attachment: HBASE-16308.master.008.patch > Contain protobuf references > --- > >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16308) Contain protobuf references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-16308: -- Attachment: HBASE-16308.master.009.patch > Contain protobuf references > --- > >

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-16361) Revert of HBASE-16317, "revert all ESAPI..." broke TestLogLevel

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack resolved HBASE-16361. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.0.0 Resolving as fixed by HBASE-16267. I don't see TestLogLevel fai

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9899) for idempotent operation dups, return the result instead of throwing conflict exception

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-9899: - Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Fix Version/s: 1.4.0 1.3.0 Statu

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16308) Contain protobuf references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15412925#comment-15412925 ] stack commented on HBASE-16308: --- Fix the findbugs (not mine) and a NPE. There are still som

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16367) Race between master and region server initialization may lead to premature server abort

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15412933#comment-15412933 ] stack commented on HBASE-16367: --- What is this? It adds: 821 if (this.initLatch !=

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9899) for idempotent operation dups, return the result instead of throwing conflict exception

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15413571#comment-15413571 ] stack commented on HBASE-9899: -- Pushed the addendum. Thanks [~zghaobac] for keeping an eye on

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16308) Contain protobuf references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-16308: -- Attachment: HBASE-16308.master.010.patch > Contain protobuf references > --- > >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16308) Contain protobuf references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-16308: -- Attachment: HBASE-16308.master.011.patch > Contain protobuf references > --- > >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16308) Contain protobuf references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-16308: -- Release Note: Undo protobuf references through the codebase so protobuf references are contained rather than sp

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16308) Contain protobuf references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-16308: -- Attachment: HBASE-16308.master.012.patch > Contain protobuf references > --- > >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16386) Fix findbug RV_RETURN_VALUE_IGNORED: Method ignores return value In HRegionServer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15414753#comment-15414753 ] stack commented on HBASE-16386: --- I have a fix in HBASE-16308 Hopefully it lands tomorrow.

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16386) Fix findbug RV_RETURN_VALUE_IGNORED: Method ignores return value In HRegionServer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15414760#comment-15414760 ] stack commented on HBASE-16386: --- Findbugs came in with HBASE-16367 > Fix findbug RV_RETURN

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16308) Contain protobuf references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-16308: -- Attachment: HBASE-16308.master.013.patch > Contain protobuf references > --- > >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16308) Contain protobuf references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15414766#comment-15414766 ] stack commented on HBASE-16308: --- v13 Fix fact that I was not initializing RpcController in

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16308) Contain protobuf references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-16308: -- Attachment: HBASE-16308.master.014.patch > Contain protobuf references > --- > >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16308) Contain protobuf references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15415336#comment-15415336 ] stack commented on HBASE-16308: --- In last patch, undid the addition of retries in Admin. The

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16308) Contain protobuf references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-16308: -- Attachment: HBASE-16308.master.015.patch > Contain protobuf references > --- > >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16308) Contain protobuf references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-16308: -- Attachment: HBASE-16308.master.015.patch > Contain protobuf references > --- > >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16386) Fix findbug RV_RETURN_VALUE_IGNORED: Method ignores return value In HRegionServer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15415383#comment-15415383 ] stack commented on HBASE-16386: --- Please do not commit. It will mess up my trying to land hb

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16308) Contain protobuf references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-16308: -- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Pushed this again even though it has changed

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >