Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-707) Lucene Java Site docs

Good catch. Shows you how little I look at the title! Anyway, it appears that SOLR does it as Title whereas our old xdocs are Titleproperties>. Apparently, Forrest and Anakia have different interpretations of xdocs. Updates are on http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/site/ -Grant On Nov

Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-707) Lucene Java Site docs

: Please let me know what you think, but stick to layout problems and : introduced errors (i.e. write up a different bug for errors in the : documentation that already exist). I don't know enough about forrest to explain this, but all of the pages seem to be getting an empty (the PDFs don't see

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-707) Lucene Java Site docs

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-707?page=comments#action_12450567 ] Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-707: I think I have ironed out the issues. I am not going to submit a patch, just yet, instead I ask that people go re

Re: [jira] Updated: (LUCENE-675) Lucene benchmark: objective performance test for Lucene

Doron Cohen (JIRA) wrote: > [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-675?page=all ] > (I used Tortoise SVN to create the patch). I haven't tried to use TortoiseSVN to create patches, but my experience with it for other purposes has been negative enough, especially in trying to use it on

Re: [jira] Updated: (LUCENE-675) Lucene benchmark: objective performance test for Lucene

Doron, On Thursday 16 November 2006 21:17, Doron Cohen (JIRA) wrote: > ... > PS. Before submitting the patch file, I tried to apply it myself on a clean version of the code, just to make sure that it works. But I got errors like this -- Could not retrieve revision 0 of "...\byTask\.." -- for eve

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-713) File Formats Documentation is not correct for Term Vectors

File Formats Documentation is not correct for Term Vectors -- Key: LUCENE-713 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-713 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Bug Compo

RE: file format incosisentcy (any answer ?) IMPORTANT

When the field stores offsets and positions of its terms within term vectors (in the .tvf file), these are not specified in the file format documentation. But looking to the TermVectorsWriter within the writeField() method, you'll see that if offsets and positions are required, then these are wri

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-675) Lucene benchmark: objective performance test for Lucene

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-675?page=all ] Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-675: --- Attachment: benchmark.byTask.patch I am attaching benchmark.byTask.patch - to be applied in the contrib/benchmark directory. Root package of byTask classes was

Re: svn commit: r475423 - in /lucene/java/trunk: docs/whoweare.html xdocs/whoweare.xml

Doug Cutting wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Modified: lucene/java/trunk/docs/whoweare.html lucene/java/trunk/xdocs/whoweare.xml It looks like you still need to refresh the website. ssh people.apache.org cd /www/lucene.apache.org/java/docs svn up Woops! OK I've done this now.

Re: svn commit: r475423 - in /lucene/java/trunk: docs/whoweare.html xdocs/whoweare.xml

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Modified: lucene/java/trunk/docs/whoweare.html lucene/java/trunk/xdocs/whoweare.xml It looks like you still need to refresh the website. ssh people.apache.org cd /www/lucene.apache.org/java/docs svn up Doug --

Stephen Hussey is out of the office.

I will be out of the office starting 11/16/2006 and will not return until 11/29/2006. I will respond to your message when I return.

[jira] Closed: (LUCENE-703) Change QueryParser to use ConstantScoreRangeQuery in preference to RangeQuery by default

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-703?page=all ] Mark Harwood closed LUCENE-703. --- Resolution: Fixed > Change QueryParser to use ConstantScoreRangeQuery in preference to RangeQuery > by default >