[JBoss-dev] Initial installer prototype

2005-05-09 Thread Scott M Stark
I have a 25997040 Mb IzPack based installer available on sourceforge: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/jboss/jboss-4.0.2-installer.jar?downl oad that illustrates the direction we are looking to head in terms of a much more flexible installation packaging. This is a default configuration footp

RE: [JBoss-dev] creating jboss thirdparty directory

2005-05-09 Thread Scott M Stark
That is fine, but I'm creating a jbossbuild script that will generate the legacy thirdparty structure from the repository to get rid of the existing thirdparty cvs tree. I would like to have the option of not having to checkout the legacy thirdparty tree as part of the jboss-4.0/jboss-head co and i

[JBoss-dev] TreeCacheAop needs your idea

2005-05-09 Thread Ben Wang
Sorry for the *spam*. I have posted this to the Cache forum. But I figure I can cast a wider net to solicit more idea here. :-) I am starting to gather a use case for the TreeCacheAop white paper after the fine-grained http session replication is almost complete. I want your contribution for any

RE: [JBoss-dev] creating jboss thirdparty directory

2005-05-09 Thread Ben Wang
Tom, JBossCache is in the same boat. Scott has mentioned that he will take care of that soon. So I will let him chime in on this one. Cheers, -Ben -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Elrod Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 1:34 PM To: jboss-dev

[JBoss-dev] jboss-4.0-jdk-matrix Build Failed

2005-05-09 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0-jdk-matrix?log=log20050509175454 BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: /home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:63: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jbo

[JBoss-dev] creating jboss thirdparty directory

2005-05-09 Thread Tom Elrod
Since I am now doing all new development in the JBossRemoting module, which is stand alone, I would like to make a few changes as to how jboss-head picks up the remoting code. First, I would like to make the remoting code visible to jboss-head as a binary. For the old build, this means adding

[JBoss-dev] jboss-3.2-jdk-matrix Build Failed

2005-05-09 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2-jdk-matrix?log=log20050509154200 BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: /home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:63: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jbo

[JBoss-dev] jboss-4.0-jdk-matrix Build Failed

2005-05-09 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0-jdk-matrix?log=log20050509152434 BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: /home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:63: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jbo

[JBoss-dev] jboss-4.0-testsuite Build Failed

2005-05-09 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0-testsuite?log=log20050509091859 BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: /home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:66: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jbos

[JBoss-dev] Dillonism

2005-05-09 Thread Adrian Brock
Just a friendly request. If you are going to reformat code, can you please submit the reformat *INDEPENDENTLY* of any modifications you make. Doing them together makes it almost impossible to understand/see what changes you made. -- Adrian Brock Chief Scientist JBoss In