Re: [jboss-group] RE: [JBoss-dev] 4.0 rollback 1st phase complete

2003-08-29 Thread Peter Fagerlund
On Thursday, Aug 28, 2003, at 23:43 Europe/Stockholm, Bill Burke wrote: Yes, it was a PAIN! My fingers hurt from typing in my CVS password so many times. Besides the PAIN! ... cool call ... --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Wel

Re: [JBoss-dev] hsqldb options

2003-03-30 Thread Peter Fagerlund
söndagen den 30 mars 2003 kl 20.33 skrev marc fleury: why don't we bring them on then? Send in another X number troops to fix the non result .. Pulezzze what is the non result U are experiencing ... the real or the non-real ... and You say solve it with numbers -hehe ... You are such a non-gen

Re: [JBoss-dev] hsqldb options

2003-03-29 Thread Peter Fagerlund
lördagen den 29 mars 2003 kl 18.54 skrev Sacha Labourey: Well, for quick prototyping it is nice to use the persistent version which allows to use JBossMQ for example and restart JBoss without loosing persistent messages. Yes when You want to prototype a remote DB for some reason, the legacy st

Re: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing...

2003-02-27 Thread Peter Fagerlund
hmmm ... allow me to namedrop and spread unverified grapewine info here then ... ThogetherSoft is toying with Eclice as it's runtime framework in upcoming versions ... or was that before Borland ? ... PS: Any right made void as this message is transmitted in a reporting capacity : DS ---

Re: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing...

2003-02-26 Thread Peter Fagerlund
onsdagen den 26 februari 2003 kl 22.32 skrev Bill Burke: This is one of the very reasons I avoid IDEs. If you don't live in them, you die by them. True ! ... not only of IDEs ... but systems in general !!! ... (ours come to mind) ... motivation is "key" when in a entropy volatile environment

Re: [JBoss-dev] Branch_3_0 doesn't build on OSX

2003-01-16 Thread Peter Fagerlund
torsdagen den 16 januari 2003 kl 18.28 skrev Dain Sundstrom: bash-2.05a$ ./build.sh Error: JAVA_HOME is not defined correctly. We cannot execute java setenv JAVA_HOME /System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.3.1/Home setenv = export

AutoDeploy Source Development ( Was:Re: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev)

2003-01-14 Thread Peter Fagerlund
tisdagen den 14 januari 2003 kl 20.16 skrev Dain Sundstrom: I was thinking of the script based MBean support Sacha added, and I thought can we make plain old java work like a scripting language. Here is what I came up with: + The user writes a class BlahService.java + This source file is

Re: [JBoss-dev] MBean persistence?

2003-01-11 Thread Peter Fagerlund
lördagen den 11 januari 2003 kl 19.42 skrev Dain Sundstrom: anyone working on it? When do you expect to In some sidesteps projects here ... it is easy when hsqldb is up ... or in a grid ... when one master is up to have configurations federated. ---

Re: [JBoss-dev] One thing I like about the Apache thing

2003-01-09 Thread Peter Fagerlund
Yes - well as alwyas it is easy ... We need a xmleditor(ChooseYourOSSFav) and have it open -> edit -> write(repackage zip) -> done (redeployed) ... now if only some Atlanta company would show the money - hehe /me --- This SF.NET email is sp

[JBoss-dev] Re: [JBoss-dev] 魔术手机卡,一张卡多个号

2002-12-26 Thread Peter Fagerlund
Listen : English list here ! If You are looking for a translation service ... I recommend this address [EMAIL PROTECTED] If You are looking for a service that You can not publicise on a list ... I recommend this address [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc ... Otherwise Disturbance here ... will resu

Re: [JBoss-dev] IMPORTANT! for jboss 4-- xdoclet built inside jboss

2002-12-23 Thread Peter Fagerlund
Spel again ! ... tisdagen den 24 december 2002 kl 01.14 skrev David Jencks: I've addded an xdoclet module to jboss 4 (head) that builds xdoclet from source from the xdoclet cvs tree. To minize disruption, please read! You can avoid requiring a fresh jboss checkout by executing in jboss-hea

Re: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed

2002-12-17 Thread Peter Fagerlund
oki - i am nobody ! who are u ? ... test failed ! cool ... --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/ ___

Re: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed

2002-12-15 Thread Peter Fagerlund
Chris, I will dedicate time to do a grep and peplace your .sh /peter PS: and also dub U as the first to get Rewarded ! ; söndagen den 15 december 2002 kl 19.33 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]: = ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE ht

Re: AW: AW: [JBoss-dev] JBossME

2002-12-13 Thread Peter Fagerlund
fredagen den 13 december 2002 kl 17.27 skrev Stefan Groschupf: What nokia phone ? 6310i its triple band, so it works in Europe and US. oki - it for 6310i it sez : "Java™ applications (space for up to 178 kB of Java applications); note: 128kB of static memory and up to 50 kB of dynamic memor

Re: AW: [JBoss-dev] JBossME

2002-12-13 Thread Peter Fagerlund
fredagen den 13 december 2002 kl 10.34 skrev Stefan Groschupf: Bax, since - ejb - oss get sure trouble with sun's marketing office. After some sleep JBossME sounds really good again. FYI: I would join such a project. We need only a jmx port to a nokia phone, but may be that can help as well

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossME

2002-12-12 Thread Peter Fagerlund
JBossME is maybe not the best project name ? ME being Micro Edition Maybe JBossEE (Embedded Edition) ? or EMBOSS ? The project should look into investing in DASH-O Pro to compress the binary deliverables ? Then maybe the project could have three reference devices in a range from phone to sbc ?

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossME

2002-12-12 Thread Peter Fagerlund
torsdagen den 12 december 2002 kl 18.54 skrev Holger Baxmann: according to the laws - yes, murphys too - the cpu/mem/bandwith problem doesn't influence the progress of things: it is envolving independend. what i am talking about is that a jboss-client should run on any halfway intelligent devic

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossME

2002-12-12 Thread Peter Fagerlund
torsdagen den 12 december 2002 kl 17.28 skrev Dain Sundstrom: I personally only want one build for the powerful handhelds. oki - so We have embedded devices in a range of - Phones - PDA's - SBC (Single Board Computers) If anyone wants to make the other ones, that would be cool. yes it woul

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossME

2002-12-12 Thread Peter Fagerlund
torsdagen den 12 december 2002 kl 16.01 skrev Holger Baxmann: embedded systems constits normally of many - some 1...k - devices, clustering comes to my mind ... Yes - but lets try break embedded down some, to devise's that use a "Mobile Phone Wire" and device's using a "SBC (SingleBoardComput

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossME

2002-12-12 Thread Peter Fagerlund
torsdagen den 12 december 2002 kl 00.41 skrev Holger Baxmann: btw: who is talking about jboss-client? All I am saying is that there will be many different devices with different VM's out there soon ... and for us to have a compatible jboss-client build for each and every one of them is a mas

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossME

2002-12-12 Thread Peter Fagerlund
torsdagen den 12 december 2002 kl 00.41 skrev Holger Baxmann: btw: who is talking about jboss-client? i will have clustering across a whole fabrication line, a whole plant over highspeed i/o ports or similar ieee implementations. Utility Communications Architecture (UCA) Generic Object Models fo

[JBoss-dev] JBossME

2002-12-11 Thread Peter Fagerlund
Yes - a separated JBossClient project would be clean in diff'ing the different built's for target'ed device VM's. JBoss Serving up J2ME is natural without any further coupling ... Then - *WoW* - when adding jboss-client into the mix - gives - having an object inside the client *mirroring* the J

Re: [JBoss-dev] Proposal for changes to URL deployment to clean up netboot

2002-12-10 Thread Peter Fagerlund
tisdagen den 10 december 2002 kl 19.03 skrev Jeremy Boynes: I lean toward A) as there are existing dependencies during boot (e.g. getopt, gnu-regexp, log4j) but I realise that adding more is undesirable. Functionality is desired ... when 'one' dives in a prob on a moving xp target - the 'one'

Re: [JBoss-dev] Interesting Deployment Ordering "Issue"

2002-12-06 Thread Peter Fagerlund
able to sort out this kind of tampering and redeploy everything correctly? I mean, it would be quite nice but it seems like the case I presented isn't often to occur in any real situation... Hunter From: Peter Fagerlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 7 D

Re: [JBoss-dev] Interesting Deployment Ordering "Issue"

2002-12-06 Thread Peter Fagerlund
Please file a bug report ! or else i have to ,-) ... yes i found some things not working when it comes to "internal components" redeploying since We tend to mostly focus on application (re)deploy ... a simple ex. run jb -> do a db/ds test -> redeploy db/ds - do a db test : will fail in my tests

Re: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Patches-649128 ] wrong port in hsqldb-service.xml

2002-12-05 Thread Peter Fagerlund
Correct You are ... Either Jason should apply the patches or give You RW since that was his promise. Good work Thanks /peter_f torsdagen den 5 december 2002 kl 20.50 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Patches item #649128, was opened at 2002-12-05 11:50 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.n

Re: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-648807 ] databaseMetaData.getTables has changed

2002-12-05 Thread Peter Fagerlund
torsdagen den 5 december 2002 kl 08.10 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'm still curious why a lowercase string won't retrieve the table name: this seems to me to be a bug in hsqldb. Comments, peter? donow ... maybe here org.hsqldb.jdbcConnection.java: public String nativeSQL(String sql) throws SQL

[JBoss-dev] Re: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net

2002-11-26 Thread Peter Fagerlund
onsdagen den 27 november 2002 kl 01.36 skrev Peter Fagerlund: The schedule is/was set for 3.2RC ... So in short ... i am not doing it ... show yourselfs ... ( hint ; Jason do not know how to ) ... /thesame --- This SF.net email is

[JBoss-dev] jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net

2002-11-26 Thread Peter Fagerlund
tisdagen den 26 november 2002 kl 22.55 skrev Jeremy Boynes: >I'm trying to get PetStore 1.3.1 running with 3.2 but its DAO code uses >ResultSet.absolute() which is not supported by hsqldb 1.6 but is by 1.7.1> >Will the changes to support 1.7.1 be backported to 3.2 before its release? Is that a

Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: JBoss/CMP Improvements

2002-11-26 Thread Peter Fagerlund
tisdagen den 26 november 2002 kl 15.49 skrev Stefan Arentz: I'd kill to have more test cases and especially performance test cases. I would love to have tests the spit out a XML file with timings. Then we could quickly determine the results of a change. And then create reports similar to

Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: JBoss/CMP Improvements

2002-11-26 Thread Peter Fagerlund
tisdagen den 26 november 2002 kl 03.08 skrev Stefan Arentz: I'd kill to have more test cases and especially performance test cases. I would love to have tests the spit out a XML file with timings. Then we could quickly determine the results of a change. And then create reports similar to the

Re: [JBoss-dev] Big Brother ala Java...

2002-11-22 Thread Peter Fagerlund
torsdagen den 21 november 2002 kl 11.13 skrev Jason Dillon: Shit, I need to clone myself. So much todo and so little time. Anyone interested in working to build a better future... let me know I have a handful of really good projects for you to work on. oki - so now it is kosher to shrimp fo

Re: [JBoss-dev] TODO: NetBoot PetStore

2002-11-22 Thread Peter Fagerlund
fredagen den 22 november 2002 kl 01.35 skrev James Cook: Prob the most interesting part will be setting it up to work on hsql out of the box. Please consider using a lookup of DefaultDS instead of calling hsqldb direct in any generic code. /peter_f

Re: [JBoss-dev] Jetty NIO SL in JBoss 3.0.4 no worky

2002-11-21 Thread Peter Fagerlund
Fuck... how can we make one build work for both? Use a runtime switch ... in a preprocessor ala xDoclet ? --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _

Re: [JBoss-dev] Jetty NIO SL in JBoss 3.0.4 no worky

2002-11-21 Thread Peter Fagerlund
torsdagen den 21 november 2002 kl 11.46 skrev Jason Dillon: Fuck... how can we make one build work for both? Use a runtime switch ... --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _

Re: [JBoss-dev] MetaDataRepository Proposal

2002-11-14 Thread Peter Fagerlund
onsdagen den 13 november 2002 kl 23.56 skrev Dain Sundstrom: public interface MetaDataRepository { MetaDataRepository getParent(); void setParent(MetaDataRepository parent); Object get(Object attributeKey); void set(Object attributeKey, Object value); } maybe add void setJDBCBackend(

[JBoss-dev] .DS_Store

2002-11-12 Thread Peter Fagerlund
What are these binary files ? ? jboss-head/varia/src/resources/services/binding/.DS_Store ? jboss-head/varia/src/resources/services/.DS_Store ? jboss-head/connector/src/etc/example-config/.DS_Store --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To le

Re: [JBoss-dev] hsqldb "sqlcache" speed improvment indication

2002-11-12 Thread Peter Fagerlund
tisdagen den 12 november 2002 kl 16.34 skrev Christian Riege: kids, remember: don't code on drugs! You grown ops should not take drugs at all ... --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL

Re: [JBoss-dev] hsqldb "sqlcache" speed improvment indication

2002-11-12 Thread Peter Fagerlund
cache is king, makes me want to sing, all your cache are belong to us, check it out in swing, cache is king, makes me want to sing, sqlcache is a drag queen, awaiting to be seen, as lean and mean, cache is king, ming, sinister mister, use the drag queen, from the other side, run run

[JBoss-dev] hsqldb "sqlcache" speed improvment indication

2002-11-11 Thread Peter Fagerlund
Build is most - ./build.sh -Dtest=bank -Dnojars=true test 22:36:13,503 INFO [Server] Release ID: JBoss [Matrix2] 4.0.0alpha (build: CVSTag=HEAD date=20022216) Running regular Invocation (Persist==true) [junit] Running org.jboss.test.bank.test.BankEJB20StressTestCase [junit] Tests run: 10, F

Re: [JBoss-dev] Files looked on my fs from clean co

2002-11-09 Thread Peter Fagerlund
lördagen den 9 november 2002 kl 10.03 skrev Chris Kimpton: It varies - usually none - but sometimes the cvs command spits out some lock messages - but then carries on... um ... I am nor as clear as I need to be in my written english ... When I do a clean co, then build will fail, becouse of n

Re: [JBoss-dev] Files looked on my fs from clean co

2002-11-08 Thread Peter Fagerlund
fredagen den 8 november 2002 kl 15.07 skrev Chris Kimpton: What is "looked" lock'ed --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.

[JBoss-dev] Files looked on my fs from clean co

2002-11-08 Thread Peter Fagerlund
when I cvs co jboss-head they come as looked ? is this a cvs thingy ? /peter_f --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm00

Re: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed

2002-11-08 Thread Peter Fagerlund
okey - I did not manage to rename/remove some files yesterday fixing now fredagen den 8 november 2002 kl 11.19 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]: = ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net FOR DETAILS= =

Re: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed

2002-11-08 Thread Peter Fagerlund
hehe ... just pushed the button for a clean checkout at lubega and it even answers. Hopefully this will take care of it ! *** The next jboss rebuild will do a full cvs checkout - cool! TIME NOW: Fri Nov 8 08:57:55 GMT 2002 fredagen den 8 november 2002 kl 09.19 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]: =

[JBoss-dev] hsqldb 1.7.1 is using port 1701 as default in head (Matrix2)

2002-11-07 Thread Peter Fagerlund
Yes it is ... Q: why A: donow ... just one of those those things that might help in hsqldb versioning debugging ... later u all ... PS: *** build is most test is run in testsuit/build.sh tests *** 21:43:46,200 INFO [ServerInfo] Java version: 1.3.1,Apple Computer, Inc. 21:43:46,203 INFO [Serve

Re: [JBoss-dev] Testsuite rebuilding everything when initialising one test ... is so ...

2002-11-07 Thread Peter Fagerlund
torsdagen den 7 november 2002 kl 20.41 skrev David Jencks: do you know about -Dnojars=true which skips directly to the tests? I do now ! ... will try ... and wait for the cheese helmet ( read : a clean ant build system ) with integrated preprocessor (XDoclet) documentation auto updates ...

Re: [JBoss-dev] MBeanInfoDB-xmbeandd.xml - is under alien influence

2002-11-07 Thread Peter Fagerlund
torsdagen den 7 november 2002 kl 20.24 skrev Matt Munz: It would be poor design to require access to this site for correct server operation. Yes - when using sf.net ssh one should be free of this ! Then again for the "Dash-O-Pro" optimized online-CD Distros it a cool way of stats colecting fo

[JBoss-dev] Testsuite rebuilding everything when initialising one test ... is so ...

2002-11-07 Thread Peter Fagerlund
it is so ... hmmm ... it is so buildmagic ! ;-) Could We not make a ant task that checks for modified timestamps of the files in the testsuite folder -> store ( like in hsqldb running in the jboss instance You are about to test against ... hmmm ... or file ) -> and then only compile changed wh

Re: [JBoss-dev] MBeanInfoDB-xmbeandd.xml - is under alien influence

2002-11-07 Thread Peter Fagerlund
torsdagen den 7 november 2002 kl 19.32 skrev Matt Munz: \ ? is bad stuff - get a real OS ... Po-tay-toes, po-tah-toes. What's real, anyway? :) true - only on mushrooms one se "real" in this age ... http://www.jboss.org/j2ee/dtd/jboss_xmbean_1_0.dtd";> I may not get to this for a while

[JBoss-dev] why do build all fail - build most works ?

2002-11-07 Thread Peter Fagerlund
BUILD FAILED file:/Users/pf/jboss-head/security/../tools/etc/buildfragments/ targets.ent:215: /Users/pf/jboss-head/security/output/gen/classes not found. Total time: 2 minutes 21 seconds --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Pa

[JBoss-dev] MBeanInfoDB-xmbeandd.xml - is under alien influence

2002-11-07 Thread Peter Fagerlund
WTF - I am trying to test stuff an my invocation looks like : 18:02:40,640 INFO [MainDeployer] Starting deployment of package: file:/Users/pf/jboss-head/build/output/jboss-4.0.0alpha/server/default/ deploy/mbean-info-db-service.xml 18:02:40,657 INFO [SARDeployer] looking for nested deploymen

[JBoss-dev] HSQLDB 1.7.x and EJB/CMP2

2002-10-18 Thread Peter Fagerlund
My testing indicates 1.7 break's EJB/CMP2 while other hsqldb related test's passes fine, maybe just some standardjbosscmp-jdbc.xml mapping in-between 1.6.1 and 1.7.x ? Class org.jboss.test.bank.test.BankEJB20StressTestCase Name Tests Errors Failures Time(s) BankEJB20StressTestCase 10 10 0 12.3

Re: [JBoss-dev] Is the testsuite not working - or is it just me?

2002-10-09 Thread Peter Fagerlund
onsdagen den 9 oktober 2002 kl 15.16 skrev Chris Kimpton: >> I need to use the target in testsuite/build.xml. >> > > This is on HEAD (jboss-head). /jboss-head/build] ./build.sh run-basic-testsuite results in [execmodules] Missing build file; skipping module: testsuite so I am using /jboss-hea

[JBoss-dev] CVS lock ?

2002-10-08 Thread Peter Fagerlund
cvs server: [12:47:41] waiting for anoncvs_jboss's lock in /cvsroot/jboss/jboss-j2ee/src --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-dev

Re: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed

2002-10-07 Thread Peter Fagerlund
>>> = >>> >>> HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE >>> >>> build.sh: build.sh: No such file or directory When doing a clean co jboss-all the folder dloaded comes as jboss and not as jboss-all as expected. This probably fre

[JBoss-dev] hsqldb.jar

2002-10-06 Thread Peter Fagerlund
A "new" 1.6.1 hsqldb.jar is in cvs HEAD with the thread bug fix - Thanks to Michael Bartmann. /peter_f --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _

Re: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_0) TestsuiteResults:27-July-2002

2002-07-27 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 27-07-2 21.57, Scott M Stark at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > There is no tools.jar in the Apple VM and no setting is necessary to pickup > the javac compiler. Its included in the default VM classes.jar Ahhh ... I am seeing way to many errors compared to Your run in run-basic-testsuite and are c

Re: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_0) Testsuite Results:27-July-2002

2002-07-27 Thread Peter Fagerlund
What is the setenv on OSX to get the tools.jar in the classpath ? /peter_f on 27-07-2 09.41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Number of tests run: 830 > > > > Successful tests: 826 > Errors:4 > Failures:

Re: [JBoss-dev] Hypersonic 1.7 final released

2002-07-23 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 23-07-2 23.01, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > But can we embed by api? Or do we still have to call some main(String[] > args) ? install new 1.7.0 hsqldb.zip in lib as desribed in hsqldb_home/doc/hsqlAdvancedGuide.html create a file named server.properties add values : server.dat

Re: [JBoss-dev] Hypersonic 1.7 final released

2002-07-23 Thread Peter Fagerlund
They have a new config file where a variable embedded can be set to true. /p on 22-07-2 23.31, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Do we know if they have implemented better support for embedded use? I > remember Peter (or someone) saying they were considering using our patch > for this

Re: [JBoss-dev] when will head be fixed?

2002-07-07 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 07-07-2 01.48, Bill Burke at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Is it already? If You are refering to my head ... NO ... ;-) its simple ... get out of mass traffic ... get a stable source for bandwidth ... that is idependent ... use for ex. James to filter spam ! ... etc. etc .

Re: [JBoss-dev] Server restart

2002-06-04 Thread Peter Fagerlund
Periscope up ! . A java shell - Transcipting Syntax'es would be cool . http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=JShell http://homepage.mac.com/pcbeard/JShell/ Restarting the VM should involve a native memory clean up ? . /5 points on 04-06-2 03.39, Dain Sundstrom at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [JBoss-dev] Mckoi SQL

2002-05-16 Thread Peter Fagerlund
duh ... give Tomas some cred ! ... Chief Technology Officer of free db support for dummies that do not se pure speed in front of ready made icons ___ Have big pipes? SourceForge.n

Re: [JBoss-dev] WL Deployer, II

2002-05-15 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 16-05-2 01.18, Scott M Stark at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > because they want a one deployment unit works > with all servers package. What can We be part of Invent here ? ___ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download

Re: [JBoss-dev] HEAD & ClassCircularityError

2002-05-15 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 15-05-2 16.51, Sacha Labourey at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> jason, sacha or dain >> >> i need a test case, and in fact it should be in test cvs > > Sure. I don't have time now though. Any one else? Ilike to - then time says - hepp- like - i do have the time to read and "grep" the 'thingo'

Re: [JBoss-dev] Clustering statefulSessionHome.remove did not fail

2002-04-26 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 27-04-2 01.01, marc fleury at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The order of the Defenders is the ultimate one, work on the meta-system, and > bring meta-order to the order less. It's self arranging once the system is > there? > > One day there will be a *real* theoritical analysis of how Open Sour

Re: [JBoss-dev] 3.0.0 RC1 is available

2002-04-16 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 16-04-2 01.51, marc fleury at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > |4 in all + the backup of thousands more - cool ... > | > |;-) > | > |Love > > Love indeed my friend, your english is greatly improved > > "Bouge de la" ahhh ... Du menar denna "bara i tanken" by ? ... Kan inte franska ... vill *

Re: [JBoss-dev] 3.0.0 RC1 is available

2002-04-15 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 16-04-2 00.20, marc fleury at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > |Sounds like I am the first person to grab a copy? > > You want a Tshirt? how many jboss contributers does it take to change a lightbulb ? ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [JBoss-dev] 3.0.0 RC1 is available

2002-04-15 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 16-04-2 00.56, Peter Fagerlund at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > on 16-04-2 00.20, marc fleury at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> |Sounds like I am the first person to grab a copy? >> >> You want a Tshirt? > > how many jboss contributers does it take to change a lig

Re: [JBoss-dev] Deployer design

2002-04-14 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 15-04-2 02.10, David Jencks at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 2002.04.14 19:44:06 -0400 Peter Fagerlund wrote: >> on 15-04-2 01.24, Larry Sanderson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> I don't know... perhaps someone would like to add a custom layer of >&

Re: [JBoss-dev] Deployer design

2002-04-14 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 15-04-2 01.24, Larry Sanderson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I don't know... perhaps someone would like to add a custom layer of security > on all deployments. Perhaps they would like to get an email when new > deployments occur. Who knows? The point is I can see no down-side to > making th

Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: INSERTING AN ALREADY EXISTING BEAN

2002-04-13 Thread Peter Fagerlund
Marc, This is getng silly !!! ... just employ James ??? ... on 14-04-2 00.37, Dain Sundstrom at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > It will be like we discussed. The mail just took like 2 hours to get > delivered. I'm almost done... it is very simple > > -dain > > Bill Burke wrote: > >> Why n

[JBoss-dev] J2ME Embedded Tease

2002-04-12 Thread Peter Fagerlund
Q - What is a Java Delivery Server ? *** SUN and Nokia have joined forces in making Java a reality in the wireless world of applications here in Hongkong. As of today, the worldwide adoption and high-volume deployments of Java Technology enabled handsets by wireless operators has generated trem

Re: [JBoss-dev] CPU at 99.9 % after completionofrun-basic-testsuite

2002-04-11 Thread Peter Fagerlund
I think that maybe this is a testsuite error and not a jboss one ... - I do it in *cascades* - this might exhibit problem ? ... because some testsuites as of now leaves "crack" behind --not dropping tables and keep simulated corporate data - then in existence on the next run ---SLOPPY ... I have

Re: [JBoss-dev] CPU at 99.9 % after completionofrun-basic-testsuite

2002-04-11 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 11-04-2 23.46, Mac Rinehart at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Ok, I just finished running the testsuite. And with about 10 minutes passed > I am still seeing my CPU maxed out at 100%. Review of active processes shows > that java.exe is the primary consumer. This is a Win2k system with a PIII > pro

Re: [JBoss-dev] Demo

2002-04-11 Thread Peter Fagerlund
I thank You for the invitation to crack You open ... but I have to pass and give You a raincheck for now ... ;-) on 11-04-2 03.06, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> >> Your "deployables" is quite Queen'ish :-) >> it is of some importence how and why we choose a certain word to gi

Re: [JBoss-dev] Demo

2002-04-10 Thread Peter Fagerlund
> but what? > > Maybe "available-services" or "possible-services" Ahhh ... no ... no ... and then Yes of course ... Your "deployables" is quite Queen'ish :-) it is of some importence how and why we choose a certain word to give meaning of purpose ... a "word is a container of a concept" ... the

Re: [JBoss-dev] Demo

2002-04-10 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 10-04-2 18.50, Andrew Scherpbier at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > How about "deployables" in the root of the distribution tree. close but ... > Also, to follow up on Peter's message in a different thread about using > a default.war to document things... I really like that idea. It can > be

Re: [JBoss-dev] Demo

2002-04-10 Thread Peter Fagerlund
scenario: when U dload . one wants instant gratification ( I know Me want ) ... So HOW ARE U GOING TO DO THAT JASON ... without help ? *** The People that trained me said -> it is ready when it is ready ... > I am willing to work on something like this (for 3.1, not 3.0!!!) if > there is any

Re: [JBoss-dev] Demo

2002-04-10 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 10-04-2 18.50, Andrew Scherpbier at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > How about "deployables" in the root of the distribution tree. close but ... > Also, to follow up on Peter's message in a different thread about using > a default.war to document things... I really like that idea. It can > be

Re: [JBoss-dev] So how big is the smallest MBeanServer I canrun...

2002-04-10 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 10-04-2 16.22, Dain Sundstrom at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > File size or memory foot print. and after a DashO Pro I guess 30% less in File size ? ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jbo

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss primary services

2002-04-10 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 10-04-2 14.34, Pieter at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > http://www.jboss.org/online-manual/HTML/ch13s98.html links to > http://java.sun.com/products/javamail/1.2/docs/javadocs/index.html. Does this > mean the full JavaMail 1.2 API is implemented? Yes - there is a handle availible to the full Jav

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss primary services

2002-04-10 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 10-04-2 10.46, Pieter at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Actually, I'm looking for something like > http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs61/notes/issues.html#1056662, but then for JBoss > 2.4.3/4 and 3.0. Yes - very good - I think this could be collected from a wide variety of sources like sf.net / forum

Re: [JBoss-dev] Demo

2002-04-10 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 11-04-2 03.47, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > After a bit more thought I think that a "minimal" server config is > really pointless, though I do think we need to document it somewhere. Could the configuration folders named default also contain a simple default_conf_doc.war that wo

Re: [JBoss-dev] Demo

2002-04-09 Thread Peter Fagerlund
mpiles / deploys -huh ... I am dreaming - so I should go to bed and continue ;-) later /peter_f > --jason > > > Peter Fagerlund wrote: > >> on 11-04-2 01.21, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> Do you mean a demo or example configuration f

Re: [JBoss-dev] Demo

2002-04-09 Thread Peter Fagerlund
aybe a folder for cluster and the like called extended ? ... The deployer would need to be aware and ant triggable ...Yes - We talked about it some while ago and the concencus was - cool ;-) if that is not final . then . Ahhh ... /peter_f > --jason > > > Peter Fagerlund wrote: > >&g

[JBoss-dev] Demo

2002-04-09 Thread Peter Fagerlund
Are We ready to make a Demo folder in jboss-all/ that BM would copy into output/*/* where I could with an ant build.xml file build and copy to deploy ... and once in deployed in deploy as a webapp I could edit some source - save - *bong* - cool ... /peter_f _

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss primary services

2002-04-09 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 09-04-2 23.01, Pieter at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'd like to make an overview of JBoss 2.4.4 with hints to 3.0. I'll link you > to the results when I'm done. > So in the next few days, I'll be posting some questions on clustering, > caching, etc. cool > But first: has anyone already made

Re: [JBoss-dev] Scheduled MBeans (Suggested Patch)

2002-04-09 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 09-04-2 20.36, cepage at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > t invocation to be scheduled. This is still not a perfect solution, but IMHO > it is much better than the current situation. Please submit this as a patch at : http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=22866&atid=376687 This way all contrib

Re: [JBoss-dev] CPU at 99.9 % after completion ofrun-basic-testsuite

2002-04-09 Thread Peter Fagerlund
did a clean cvs today (13.45.20 CET) and after completion of run-basic-testsuite cpu is normal ... yesterdays cvs (16.39.05 CET) behaves differently and hangs somewhere after completion of run-basic-testsuite ... /peter_f ___ Jboss-development mailing

Re: [JBoss-dev] CPU at 99.9 % after completion ofrun-basic-testsuite

2002-04-09 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 08-04-2 23.30, Mac Rinehart at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Haven't actually checked out the CPU usage, Ahhh ... > And I've also noticed "slowness" in other applications after > running the testsuite. Could You please check Your CPU before and after running the testsuite ? ... /peter_f __

[JBoss-dev] Pollo a XML-Editor

2002-04-08 Thread Peter Fagerlund
Maybe this tool could be extended for management screenshoot : http://pollo.sourceforge.net/sitemap1.png sf.net : http://sourceforge.net/projects/pollo/ beutiful for ant and *-service.xml files allready, not so happy with BM xml files tho ;-( ... yet ? ... /peter_f

[JBoss-dev] CPU at 99.9 % after completion of run-basic-testsuite

2002-04-08 Thread Peter Fagerlund
CVS co jboss-all yesterday (20020804-16.39.05) after runing the "run-basic-testsuite" CPU keeps pegging at close to MAX for hours. I am on RH 7.2 using Blackdown 1.3.1 Anybody else se this ? /peter_f ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: AW: AW: [JBoss-dev] JMX HTML... From the Pure FluffDepartment...

2002-04-07 Thread Peter Fagerlund
Cool - I really like the screen visuals ... will dload in the morning (CET) and try out live ... cool ... let us know of anything You need furthering this ... like "Money for nNothing and Girls for Free" ... ;-) /peter_f on 08-04-2 01.35, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> In the proje

Re: [JBoss-dev] Patched HSQLDB sources?

2002-04-07 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 07-04-2 23.48, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> It growed on me to be able to have all listerners >> (NAME:PORT) registred in a component for easy access >> by other components, to be able to understand >> what ports are running in the WM and be JMX intra-machine >> negotiation capa

Re: [JBoss-dev] I want my docbook-xsl

2002-04-07 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 07-04-2 16.10, Peter Fagerlund at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Did a clean CVS co and the build.xml complains at line 530 about FNFE > docbook-xsl - I do not eaven have a thirdparty/oasis/ folder ??? ... > > I go for a espresso meanwhile ... did a -dP and got it now - sorry .

[JBoss-dev] I want my docbook-xsl

2002-04-07 Thread Peter Fagerlund
Did a clean CVS co and the build.xml complains at line 530 about FNFE docbook-xsl - I do not eaven have a thirdparty/oasis/ folder ??? ... I go for a espresso meanwhile ... /peter_f ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.s

Re: [JBoss-dev] Patched HSQLDB sources?

2002-04-07 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 07-04-2 09.30, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> If one uses ones own ServerSocket and connection threads that use the >> hsqldb.Database class directly - then We do not need to touch the hsqldb >> code and have more controll over the listeners in JBoss ... this is how the >> Avalon p

Re: [JBoss-dev] Listerner factory

2002-04-05 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 05-04-2 05.08, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Do you have a design for such a component? I do not have a full understanding of the requirements ... > There will always be components which don't support this so we need to > provide another option as well, Then just register the l

  1   2   3   >