Re: Directory layout (was Re: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS and SQL Server 2000)

2003-02-27 Thread David Jencks
Early in 2.x development we had one module, as you seem to be recommending. Personally I still think we would be developing 2.x level features without the module structure. Among the many advantages modules give you are the ability to know where a feature ends, the ability to easily enforce and d

Re: Directory layout (was Re: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS and SQL Server 2000)

2003-02-27 Thread Dain Sundstrom
The reason for all the modules is dependancies. This is why you can run different deployments of JBoss. If everything were in a single source tree, it would be almost impossible to run without everything. -dain On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 04:00 PM, Dave Neuer wrote: --- Dain Sundstrom

Directory layout (was Re: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS and SQL Server 2000)

2003-02-27 Thread Dave Neuer
--- Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I agree about the eclipse discussion, but it does > actually have a point > for development of the jboss server. It is always a > pain to get any > IDE to like our directory layout. > > -dain > I would go so far as to say that it is a pain

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS and SQL Server 2000

2003-02-27 Thread Dain Sundstrom
On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 02:49 PM, Brian Repko wrote: And to the JBoss-dev list - jeez - way to shut down a newbie. Here is someone in a Microsoft shop bringing in J2EE and JBoss and not one message was helpful and a couple were downright mean. "No you are wrong" and "don't post here".

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS and SQL Server 2000

2003-02-27 Thread Brian Repko
Richard, While I've not tried what you are asking about, JBoss (and any J2EE server) will use a database via JDBC. There are two main JDBC drivers for MS SQL Server 2000 that I would recommend. One is the DataDirect JDBC driver (which is resold by Microsoft) and the Sprinta2000 or Opta2000 drive

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS and SQL Server 2000

2003-02-27 Thread Holger Baxmann
erver environment is better than windows will ever be. bax Thanks -Original Message- From: Kristian Köhler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 8:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: AW: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS and SQL Server 2000 That's not true. JBoss works w

Re: AW: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS and SQL Server 2000

2003-02-27 Thread Dain Sundstrom
r? Oh... :-) Kristian Thanks -Original Message- From: Kristian Köhler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 8:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: AW: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS and SQL Server 2000 That's not true. JBoss works with MS SQL Server 2000. Kristian -- Orientation in Ob

AW: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS and SQL Server 2000

2003-02-27 Thread Kristian Köhler
uary 27, 2003 8:03 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: AW: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS and SQL Server 2000 > > > That's not true. > JBoss works with MS SQL Server 2000. > > Kristian > -- > Orientation in Objects GmbH > http://www.oio.de > > -Ursprüngliche N

RE: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS and SQL Server 2000

2003-02-27 Thread Richard Schultz
öhler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 8:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: AW: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS and SQL Server 2000 That's not true. JBoss works with MS SQL Server 2000. Kristian -- Orientation in Objects GmbH http://www.oio.de -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- V

AW: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS and SQL Server 2000

2003-02-27 Thread Kristian Köhler
PROTECTED]' Betreff: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS and SQL Server 2000 New to Jboss and J2EE, but looks like we will be asked to support an app for our department. We are a Microsoft shop and looking at the JBOSS document - http://www.jboss.org/overview.jsp - it appears that JBOSS only "talks to" Ora

[JBoss-dev] JBOSS and SQL Server 2000

2003-02-27 Thread Richard Schultz
Title: Message New to Jboss and J2EE, but looks like we will be asked to support an app for our department. We are a Microsoft shop and looking at the JBOSS document - http://www.jboss.org/overview.jsp - it appears that JBOSS only "talks to" Oracle, DB2 and Postgres and not SQL Server 2000.