] Behalf Of Bill
> Burke
> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 11:27 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] stop using JDK 1.4 for development
>
>
> chris kimptons builds are perfect, but definately not useless. I'll be
> setting up a nightly build as soon
IL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 7:51 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] stop using JDK 1.4 for development
> This actually brings up another question. In using the JNP for JNDI
> detector (invoker stuff), it requires javax.net.ServerSocketFactory, which
> is in JDK 1.4
Have you considered setting up the target and bootclasspath attributes
on the javac ant tasks to force 1.3 compatibility?
Steve
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
I meant to say "not" perfect.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill
> Burke
> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 11:27 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] stop using JDK 1.4 for development
0:53 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] stop using JDK 1.4 for development
>
>
> Any automated build and reporting system would be valuable... just
> depends on the implementation as to whether it is useful or not.
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Friday
nt: Friday, February 28, 2003 10:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] stop using JDK 1.4 for development
I'd prefer to have a reliable way to report these problems, since I
don't consider it realistic for me to develop on 1.3.1. How do you
detect them?
For the particular p
ebruary 28, 2003 10:16 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] stop using JDK 1.4 for development
>
> I'd prefer to have a reliable way to report these problems, since I
> don't consider it realistic for me to develop on 1.3.1. How do you
> detect them?
&g
e Checkstyle
tool (http://checkstyle.sourceforge.net) might also be used/modified to enforce this
and other usage rules.
- Matt
-Original Message-
From: David Jencks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 2/28/2003 10:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] stop using JDK 1.4 for development
-Original Message-
From: Matt Munz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Matt Munz
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 8:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] stop using JDK 1.4 for development
Bill,
I thought JBoss was going to support 1.4. Is this not the case?
- Matt
hey useful to anyone?
david
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> David Jencks
> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 10:16 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] stop using JDK 1.4 for developmen
check the version before you compile) and that would fix
this problem for everyone?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David Jencks
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 10:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] stop using JDK 1.4 for d
I'd prefer to have a reliable way to report these problems, since I don't
consider it realistic for me to develop on 1.3.1. How do you detect them?
For the particular problem of nested exceptions, I think we should always
use the jboss NestedThrowable stuff Jason wrote since it provides a much
mo
03 9:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] stop using JDK 1.4 for development
We're not going to have .jpp or other ant switches just so that people can use
nested exceptions
-Original Message-
9:48 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] stop using JDK 1.4 for development
>
>
> The real question is: Does JBoss _require_ 1.4?
>
> I hope the answer will be 'no'.
>
> bax
>
> Am Freitag, 28.02.03, um 15:36 Uhr (Europe/Budapest) schrieb J
w and it seems to be much
better in performance and stability.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
danch
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 9:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] stop using JDK 1.4 for development
There's
ebruary 28, 2003 9:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] stop using JDK 1.4 for development
There's a big difference between supporting 1.4 and _not_ supporting 1.3
Matt Munz wrote:
> Bill,
>
> I thought JBoss was going to support 1.4. Is this not
There's a big difference between supporting 1.4 and _not_ supporting 1.3
Matt Munz wrote:
Bill,
I thought JBoss was going to support 1.4. Is this not the case?
- Matt
-Original Message-
From: Bill Burke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 2/28/2003 8:42 AM
To: Jboss-Dev
AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev]
stop using JDK 1.4 for development
Bill,
I thought JBoss was going to support 1.4. Is this not the
case?
- Matt
-Original Message- From: Bill Burke
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 2/28/2003 8:42 AM
Bill,
I thought JBoss was going to support 1.4. Is this not the case?
- Matt
-Original Message-
From: Bill Burke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 2/28/2003 8:42 AM
To: Jboss-Dev
Cc:
Subject: [JBoss-dev] stop using JDK 1.4 for
19 matches
Mail list logo
