Hi Brain,
I tried with SP2, seems like it is fixed in that release. I am wondering is
SP2 IS A STABLE VERSION TO USE IN PRODUCTION. Please let me know, thanks alot
for your responses and are really helpful.
Anupama
View the original post :
Yes, 1.2.4.SP2 is a stable production release. It is the release that will be
used in JBoss AS 4.0.4 when it comes out in a few weeks.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3928812#3928812
Reply to the post :
Hi Brain,
I been caught up with something else, today I got some breathing time and
I tried that.
I am getting the following exception on client side
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger
(org.jboss.security.SecurityAssociation).
| log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system
Can you try JBossCache 1.2.4.SP2? This should be fixed.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3928279#3928279
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3928279
I'm wondering if you could solve your problem by implementing read/writeObject
as follows:
| private void writeObject(java.io.ObjectOutputStream out)
| throws IOException
| {
|out.writeObject(itemCode);
|out.writeObject(description);
|out.writeBoolean(defaultItem);
I think Brian's suggestion should work to explicitly define your own read/write
external. If true, this is brilliant! :-)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3924102#3924102
Reply to the post :
hi Ben,
Thanks alot for your response, my question would be if we n't able to transport
PoJo cached object how people are working around that. So if am n't wrong, we
need to use PoJo when we need to use cached objects in middleware only.
I really want to take pros of PoJO cache, if that is
Usually, the use case is everyone participates in the cluster replication group
as a peer. But I am not saying that it can't be done. Like I said, some form of
dettach/re-attach could work. But that probably would defeat the strength of
PojoCache since when detached, it won't be able to
Anu,
What you ae looking for is the detach/re-attach capbility of which PojoCache
does not have now (noy sure if it even makes sense though).
Is the plain TreeCache an option then?
-Ben
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3923495#3923495
Reply to
Hi Ben,
Thanks for your reply, if I make Answer as non-serializable I need some of way
of sending Answer contents in Serialized object. I don't have any control over
client whatsoever, they are using TeamBridge(no Idea what it is) but it's main
requirement is they need serialized object what
Hi Folks,
one more thing to add.
I want to cache Answer object which is structured as above but I need that to
be serializable since for front-end their system won't work if objects are n't
serizable.
My question is can I make this class as seriazable and still use Tree Cache
AOP. If I
1. You don't need Anser to be Serilaizable to run TreeCacheAop.
2. But I assume you are transporting Answer object between your client and
erver? This won't work since the Answer object is aspectized, meaning it has
additonal CacheInterceptor attached (and therefore not Serializable).
12 matches
Mail list logo
