First choice is UPPER_CASE second choice is lower_case
-Brian
On Feb 14, 2005, at 6:42 PM, Matthew T. Adams wrote:
I like UPPER_CASE...
-Original Message-
From: Michelle Caisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 3:41 PM
To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: Convention fo
On Tuesday 15 February 2005 07:49, Craig Russell wrote:
> Please reply to jdo-dev alias as well as jdo-experts alias.
>
> This is not a super important issue but it's very timely.
:o)
IMHO, I think the UPPERCASE that is still preferred by many DB admins are a
relic from COBOL days, and that the
Since this is intended to test the implementation, why not use all of
them?
Erik Bengtson
-Original Message-
From: Michelle Caisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 12:41 AM
To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: Convention for case of SQL objects
Hi, all,
What ca
Hi Michelle,
My notes say that we decided ultimately to leave Person as concrete and
to map all the classes in that hierarchy to a Person table.
yes, this is what I recall, too.
- Person is concrete
- Employee is abstract
- FullTimeEmployee and PartTimeEmployee are both concrete
All of them are ma
Hi Craig, hi Michelle,
some chapters of the JDO spec are renumbered from 1.0 to 2.0:
ChapterJDO 1.0 JDO 2.0
Extent15 19
JDO Reference Enhancer20 21
Interface StateManager21 22
JDOPermission 22
Yes, that does need to be done. I can do that when I have my turn at
the spreadsheet.
-- Michelle
Michael Bouschen wrote:
Hi Craig, hi Michelle,
some chapters of the JDO spec are renumbered from 1.0 to 2.0:
ChapterJDO 1.0 JDO 2.0
Extent15 19
Hi Michelle,
I thought about this again and meanwhile I'm not sure whether we should
do the renumbering of the assertions. It is a lot of work changing the
spreadsheet and the corresponding TCK test classes. But what concerns me
more is that all the TCK test cases we have today are valid JDO 1
Javadogs,
So when I tried to subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
jdo-dev@db.apache.org, I realized I don't know how to do it. The
subscribe message takes the "from" email address. And I don't know how
to fake this.
Can anyone help?
Craig
On Feb 11, 2005, at 1:10 PM, Geoff hendrey wrote:
Put us all o
The conventions which I'm used to here in London are:
table names: capitals with _ separator
column names: lowercase with _ separator
e.g. EMPLOYEE_PAYROLL.employee_id
On Mon Feb 14 20:37:40 PST 2005, Niclas Hedhman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 15 February 2005 07:49, Craig Russell wrot
I'm fine with either approach. I think you're right about the problem
with the JDO1 spec, so let's change the numbers back in the 2.0 spec.
-- Michelle
Michael Bouschen wrote:
Hi Michelle,
I thought about this again and meanwhile I'm not sure whether we
should do the renumbering of the assertio
10 matches
Mail list logo
