Hello Everyone,
I am a 3rd-year Computer Science student from India. I found GSOC project
Simple Pull-Request Job Plugin very interesting and want to work on it.
But I have some concerns.
1. In project description, it's been stated as following
"Specifically, this plugin does not create
Hello Abhishek,
Thanks for your interest in the Jenkins GSoC projects.
> But then for every pull request administrator of the project needs to create
> a job and then trigger a build. I think this will be cumbersome.
Yes that is a model that I have seen. But there there is another model which i
Hi Abhishek,
+1 to what you say. Any comments about the project proposal will be
appreciated. Actually we expect students to make their own proposals, so do
not consider the project idea description as a specification.
We just need to get input from YAML file and do things according to that.
>
On Friday, March 16, 2018 at 10:12:33 AM UTC, Oleg Nenashev wrote:
>
>
> We just need to get input from YAML file and do things according to that.
>>
>> There is a java lib available to parse YAML file:
>> https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-dataformats-text/tree/master/yaml
>>
>
> According to m
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:22 PM, martinda wrote:
> there there is another model which is to have a job that handles all the pull
> requests of a git repo to a given branch. For example say there is a git
> repository called jupiter/juno.git (jupiter is the name of the github org or
> of the bi
Hello Everyone,
Thank you for the clarifications.
Oleg Nenashev and James Nord thank you for the recommendation of *"Snake
YAML".*
*@martinda *
While my research I came across something called EnvironmentContributor in
Jenkins. Do you think that we can use this to pass required variables to
t
On Friday, March 16, 2018 at 5:39:09 PM UTC-4, Abhishek Gautam wrote:
>
>
> *@martinda *
> While my research I came across something called EnvironmentContributor in
> Jenkins. Do you think that we can use this to pass required variables to
> the build processes?
>
Hi Abhishek,
I have never use
On Friday, March 16, 2018 at 11:17:02 AM UTC-4, Jesse Glick wrote:
>
> you are proposing some YAML
> format—easily handled by an existing pair of extension points in
> `workflow-multibranch`. I have discussed this is another thread.
>
Hi Jesse,
I could be wrong but I have the impression that yo
Hello Abhishek,
I forgot to mention that we have office hours and all students are invited
to participate and ask questions.
See https://jenkins.io/projects/gsoc/#office-hours for specific times.
Martin
On Friday, March 16, 2018 at 8:55:52 PM UTC-4, martinda wrote:
>
> On Friday, March 16, 2018
Hello Jesse,
Thank you for your reply. Can you please provide the link to the thread
where you have discussed the thing you mentioned.
On Friday, March 16, 2018 at 8:47:02 PM UTC+5:30, Jesse Glick wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:22 PM, martinda > wrote:
> > there there is another model w
Hello Everyone,
@martinda, I have prepared my proposal for the project Simple Pull-Request
Job Plugin and shared it on the official GSOC website.
The link to the project proposal:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cuC0AvQG3e4GCjIoCwK3J0tcJVAz1eNDKV8d_zXxlO8/edit?usp=sharing
Please let me know
Hello Abhishek,
Thank you for sharing the proposal. I have added some comments for your
consideration.
Best,
Martin
On Sunday, March 18, 2018 at 12:14:52 AM UTC-4, Abhishek Gautam wrote:
>
> Hello Everyone,
> @martinda, I have prepared my proposal for the project Simple Pull-Request
> Job Plug
Hi Abhishek,
This is the other thread Jesse is referring to:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/jenkinsci-dev/Y6OB3q1SPeI
Martin
On Saturday, March 17, 2018 at 4:35:05 AM UTC-4, Abhishek Gautam wrote:
>
> Hello Jesse,
>
> Thank you for your reply. Can you please provide the link to the thr
I have made changes according to your comments.
Thank you very much.
On Sunday, March 18, 2018 at 9:55:44 PM UTC+5:30, martinda wrote:
>
> Hello Abhishek,
>
> Thank you for sharing the proposal. I have added some comments for your
> consideration.
>
> Best,
> Martin
>
> On Sunday, March 18, 2018
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 9:11 PM, martinda wrote:
> I have the impression that you are saying that this
> GSoC project idea is a bit too shallow on the quantity of code for GSoC.
Perhaps. Depends on what approach you want the feature to take—adding
a convenience veneer atop the existing Jenkins fe
>
> Hello everyone
>
> As you all know only 2 hours are remaining for submission of GSOC
> proposal, hence I request all to look and comment on my proposal for the
> last time.
>
Proposal link:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cuC0AvQG3e4GCjIoCwK3J0tcJVAz1eNDKV8d_zXxlO8/edit
Thank you
All my comments have been addressed.
Of course the proposal will need adjustement during the community bonding
if accepted.
So +1 from me.
Thanks for finalizing it!
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 4:02 PM, Abhishek Gautam <
gautam.abhishe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone
>>
>
>
>> As you all know
Sure thing,
Thanks you everyone for your valuable feedback, specially Oleg and Martin.
I hope that I get to work with you guys.
Abhishek Gautam
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop recei
18 matches
Mail list logo