Re: [josm-dev] new package repository for Ubuntu

2012-01-23 Thread colliar
Am 19.01.2012 19:11, schrieb Dirk Stöcker: > On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, colliar wrote: > > Debians stable policy is based on the wrong assumtion, that for stable > the bugs are fixed and no features are added. But as for most packages > bug-fixes aren't done, the "debian stable" simply is a "debian old"

Re: [josm-dev] new package repository for Ubuntu

2012-01-21 Thread Dirk Stöcker
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012, Matthias Julius wrote: Debians stable policy is based on the wrong assumtion, that for stable the bugs are fixed and no features are added. But as for most packages bug-fixes aren't done, the "debian stable" simply is a "debian old". Just to clarify: Debian stable does not

Re: [josm-dev] new package repository for Ubuntu

2012-01-20 Thread Matthias Julius
Dirk Stöcker writes: > On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, colliar wrote: > >> Am 26.12.2011 18:18, schrieb David Paleino: >>> "Stable" doesn't -- generally speaking -- accept new versions of packages. >>> The >>> only way josm could be upgraded in stable is when OSM changes API to 0.7 >>> (or it >>> becomes

Re: [josm-dev] new package repository for Ubuntu

2012-01-19 Thread Dirk Stöcker
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, colliar wrote: Am 26.12.2011 18:18, schrieb David Paleino: "Stable" doesn't -- generally speaking -- accept new versions of packages. The only way josm could be upgraded in stable is when OSM changes API to 0.7 (or it becomes otherwise unusable). Also then, the preferred "f

Re: [josm-dev] new package repository for Ubuntu

2012-01-18 Thread colliar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 18.01.2012 19:33, schrieb colliar: >> (also notice that, to be in backports, we need to make sure that all the >> needed >> lib*-java packages are there, at the right versions. So it could be an easy >> task, or a daunting one.) > > Sorry do not h

Re: [josm-dev] new package repository for Ubuntu

2012-01-18 Thread colliar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 26.12.2011 18:18, schrieb David Paleino: > On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 04:30:27 +0100, colliar wrote: > >> Am 25.12.2011 09:42, schrieb David Paleino: Thanks for your work David (I read your name on many update informations these days). >> Only problem I

Re: [josm-dev] new package repository for Ubuntu

2011-12-26 Thread David Paleino
On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 04:30:27 +0100, colliar wrote: > Am 25.12.2011 09:42, schrieb David Paleino: > > On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 05:59:17 +0100, Paul Hartmann wrote: > > > >> On 12/25/2011 02:01 AM, David Paleino wrote: > >>> On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:19:25 +0100, Paul Hartmann wrote: > >> [..] > >> > >> Th

Re: [josm-dev] new package repository for Ubuntu

2011-12-25 Thread colliar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 25.12.2011 09:42, schrieb David Paleino: > On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 05:59:17 +0100, Paul Hartmann wrote: > >> On 12/25/2011 02:01 AM, David Paleino wrote: >>> On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:19:25 +0100, Paul Hartmann wrote: >>> there's now a JOSM apt repos

Re: [josm-dev] new package repository for Ubuntu

2011-12-25 Thread David Paleino
On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 05:59:17 +0100, Paul Hartmann wrote: > On 12/25/2011 02:01 AM, David Paleino wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:19:25 +0100, Paul Hartmann wrote: > > > >> there's now a JOSM apt repository for Ubuntu. It provides two packages: > >> > >> josm > >> The tested version > >>

Re: [josm-dev] new package repository for Ubuntu

2011-12-24 Thread Paul Hartmann
On 12/25/2011 02:01 AM, David Paleino wrote: > On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:19:25 +0100, Paul Hartmann wrote: > >> there's now a JOSM apt repository for Ubuntu. It provides two packages: >> >> josm >> The tested version >> Replaces the package from the official Ubuntu repository. > > Why would

Re: [josm-dev] new package repository for Ubuntu

2011-12-24 Thread colliar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 25.12.2011 02:01, schrieb David Paleino: > > Why would one need such a package? Isn't the official "josm" package good > > enough? What problems does it have? > > > > David Actually, I like your debs. They solve the dependencies and install a .desk

Re: [josm-dev] new package repository for Ubuntu

2011-12-24 Thread David Paleino
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:19:25 +0100, Paul Hartmann wrote: > there's now a JOSM apt repository for Ubuntu. It provides two packages: > > josm > The tested version > Replaces the package from the official Ubuntu repository. Why would one need such a package? Isn't the official "josm" packag

Re: [josm-dev] new package repository for Ubuntu

2011-12-24 Thread colliar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 13.12.2011 14:39, schrieb Hartmut Holzgraefe: > On 13.12.2011 14:19, Paul Hartmann wrote: >> Hi, >> >> there's now a JOSM apt repository for Ubuntu. It provides two packages: How is the licence ? I had a look on debian stable (squeeze) and the ver

Re: [josm-dev] new package repository for Ubuntu

2011-12-13 Thread Hartmut Holzgraefe
On 13.12.2011 14:19, Paul Hartmann wrote: Hi, there's now a JOSM apt repository for Ubuntu. It provides two packages: \o/ -- hartmut ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev

[josm-dev] new package repository for Ubuntu

2011-12-13 Thread Paul Hartmann
Hi, there's now a JOSM apt repository for Ubuntu. It provides two packages: josm The tested version Replaces the package from the official Ubuntu repository. josm-latest The development version (nightly build) Can be installed parallel to the josm package. For details, see https: