On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 4:01 AM Matthew Williams <
matthew.willi...@canonical.com> wrote:
> That's an awesome idea and tool Andrew thanks for sharing. Any plans for
> turning it into a charm? Would only take moments with the go binary charm
> layer
>
We have a set of DNS charms to actually tie you
Thanks for this show and tell!
I think this might solve some problems I'm having. I'll look into this, if
it is usefull to me I'll take a look at charming it...
Op dinsdag 5 januari 2016 heeft Andrew Wilkins
het volgende geschreven:
> Hi,
> A little while ago, I found myself wanting to address a
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 5:00 PM Matthew Williams <
matthew.willi...@canonical.com> wrote:
> That's an awesome idea and tool Andrew thanks for sharing. Any plans for
> turning it into a charm? Would only take moments with the go binary charm
> layer
>
For my needs that would be counter-productive, I
That's an awesome idea and tool Andrew thanks for sharing. Any plans for
turning it into a charm? Would only take moments with the go binary charm
layer
Matty
On 5 Jan 2016 08:13, "Andrew Wilkins" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A little while ago, I found myself wanting to address a service by its
> Juju name
Hi,
A little while ago, I found myself wanting to address a service by its Juju
name, but outside of Juju. I didn't want to be tied to an IP/host name,
because they might change; I didn't want to be tied to any one cloud
provider; and I wanted it to work across environments.
So I wrote a little D