At least on the mobile site the install instructions are not properly
formatted (under getting started)
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016, 6:14 PM Jorge O. Castro wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm happy to announce that 1.5.1 is here, all charms have been pushed and
> it's ready to go. Please refer to this bl
Hello everyone,
I'm happy to announce that 1.5.1 is here, all charms have been pushed and
it's ready to go. Please refer to this blog post for the lengthy changelog,
enjoy!
http://insights.ubuntu.com/2016/12/16/announcing-canonical-kubernetes-1-5-1/
--
Jorge Castro
Canonical Ltd.
http://ubuntu.
On 16 December 2016 at 22:33, Katherine Cox-Buday <
katherine.cox-bu...@canonical.com> wrote:
> Tim Penhey writes:
>
> > Make sure you also run on LXD with a decent delay to the APT archive.
>
> Open question: is there any reason we shouldn't expect charm authors to
> take a hard-right towards ch
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 09:33:18AM -0600, Katherine Cox-Buday wrote:
> Tim Penhey writes:
>
> > Make sure you also run on LXD with a decent delay to the APT
> > archive.
>
> Open question: is there any reason we shouldn't expect charm authors
> to take a hard-right towards charms with snaps embe
Hi Juju,
Cory, Kostas, Pete, and I waded through https://review.jujucharms.com/ this
week. Here's what we found:
-
ghost
-
https://review.jujucharms.com/reviews/62
-
Ghost is a simple, powerful publishing platform.
-
The charm is in a good shape (24th
Tim Penhey writes:
> Make sure you also run on LXD with a decent delay to the APT archive.
Open question: is there any reason we shouldn't expect charm authors to take a
hard-right towards charms with snaps embedded as resources? I know one of our
long-standing conceptual problems is consisten
A new development release of Juju, 2.1-beta3, is here!
## What's new?
* Deployments to LXD containers on Xenial use the more performant
directory backend https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1648513
* Constraints placed on KVM containers in bundles are honoured
* Juju SSH improvements for the
