On 31.05.2017 14:39, Tim Van Steenburgh wrote:
> But, I couldn't. The review form at https://review.jujucharms.com/ will
> respond with a empty response (Firefox says https protocol error. Chrome
> says empty response.)
> Where would I report that as a bug?
>
>
> There's a "report
>
> But, I couldn't. The review form at https://review.jujucharms.com/ will
> respond with a empty response (Firefox says https protocol error. Chrome
> says empty response.)
> Where would I report that as a bug?
>
>
There's a "report bug" link at the bottom of the review queue web pages. I
went ah
On 31.05.2017 10:45, John Meinel wrote:
> I'm pretty sure 'charm' tools have moved over to using 'snap install
> charm' as the preferred method for getting the charm tools. I'm not sure
> that there is a way to deprecate/remove the versions that are in the
> archives. For something like Zesty, it p
I'm pretty sure 'charm' tools have moved over to using 'snap install charm'
as the preferred method for getting the charm tools. I'm not sure that
there is a way to deprecate/remove the versions that are in the archives.
For something like Zesty, it probably would have been possible to just
remove
I prepared two min charms which I needed for a customer.
cs:~tilmanbaumann/logstash-conf-d-1
https://github.com/tbaumann/charm-logstash-conf-d
cs:~tilmanbaumann/logstash-input-elasticsearch-1
https://github.com/tbaumann/charm-logstash-input-elasticsearch
Those are subordninate charms that can be u
