On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Nate Finch wrote:
> Well, nevermind. That's just terrible. It's just black box testing the
> same as any external tests, except obfuscated because you're not using the
> package name. I don't know why you'd ever want to do that.
Right, exactly.
gustavo @ http
Ahh, yes, hmm, I didn't really think about it, and figured import . was
giving them access to unexported symbols (since I've never used import .,
since it always seemed like a Bad Idea). However, it doesn't do that, you
still only have access to exported symbols.
Well, nevermind. That's just ter
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Nate Finch wrote:
> One thing that I thought was very interesting was using import dot to get
> around circular references for tests. I actually hit this exact problem
> just yesterday.
>
> https://code.google.com/p/go-wiki/wiki/Style#Import_Dot
I prefer to impor
Thought this would be interesting to the members of this list:
https://code.google.com/p/go-wiki/wiki/Style
One thing that I thought was very interesting was using import dot to get
around circular references for tests. I actually hit this exact problem
just yesterday.
https://code.google.com/p
