Hello,
I have a customer handing me a GigE with dot1q tags to my EX4200 switch. I
need to carry the GigE/dot1q over a couple other EX4200s and terminate on a
GigE port of my MX80. I've read through the docs for building MPLS/ccc
circuits between the two devices. It isn't clear to me if I
Hi,
I have a customer handing me a GigE with dot1q tags to my EX4200 switch.
I need to carry the GigE/dot1q over a couple other EX4200s and terminate on
a GigE port of my MX80.
I did something similar on an SRX:
-
user@router show configuration interfaces fe-0/0/6
mtu 1800;
It's probably easier to use QinQ.
Doug
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Matthew S. Crocker
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 7:08 AM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] dot1q CCC/MPLS on EX4200
)?
- Original Message -
From: Doug Hanks dha...@juniper.net
To: Matthew S. Crocker matt...@crocker.com, juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 2:42:17 PM
Subject: RE: [j-nsp] dot1q CCC/MPLS on EX4200 series switches
It's probably easier to use QinQ.
Doug
-Original
)?
- Original Message -
From: Doug Hanks dha...@juniper.net
To: Matthew S. Crocker matt...@crocker.com, juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 2:42:17 PM
Subject: RE: [j-nsp] dot1q CCC/MPLS on EX4200 series switches
It's probably easier to use QinQ.
Doug
-Original
-EX4200)?
- Original Message -
From: Doug Hanks dha...@juniper.net
To: Matthew S. Crocker matt...@crocker.com, juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 2:42:17 PM
Subject: RE: [j-nsp] dot1q CCC/MPLS on EX4200 series switches
It's probably easier to use QinQ.
Doug
You can create a ccc based on port and just everything that comes in the
port to the other end regardless of vlan or encapsulation. There is also no
mac learning to worry about. This in my experience is easier to manage than
q-in-q which requires mac learning and spanning-tree. The down side is
7 matches
Mail list logo
