On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 5:01 AM, Dan Armbrust
wrote:
> Go ahead. I challenge you. Fill out a random PDF form using Okular.
> Make a backup of said filled out form. Now, lets see you open that
I don't like the design either.
> And X days later, when someone else shows up with a PDF file that h
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
>> I think the real solution is to fix poppler so store the annotations in
>> the Document according to the PDF standard (and use one of the adhoc
>> tricks to store annotations in PS files). This is what every user
...
> You're
> Kevin Krammer
> Weird, I seem to have backed up my email and browser form completion data
> without actually knowing where these programs store them.
> But maybe Okular's data is so different that I would escape the same backup
> procedure that work for other programs. Time will tell.
Go ahead.
On Monday, 2012-01-23, Dan Armbrust wrote:
> > If storing data to prefill form fields would be considered malware,
> > people would have a hard time browsing the Internet since malware
> > removal tools would have deinstalled all incarnations of browsers
> > already.
>
> One minor point. A PDF vi
Kevin Krammer posted on Mon, 23 Jan 2012 01:43:30 +0100 as excerpted:
> My guess is at least 4.10 but I find even 4.11 likely.
> An important fact here is that while during "KDE4" times the split of
> names or terminology around KDE products was mostly cosmetic, "KDE5"
> will very likely make actu
> If storing data to prefill form fields would be considered malware, people
> would
> have a hard time browsing the Internet since malware removal tools would have
> deinstalled all incarnations of browsers already.
One minor point. A PDF viewer is not web browser. Its much more like
a documen
On Tuesday, 2012-01-17, Duncan wrote:
> Kevin Krammer posted on Sun, 15 Jan 2012 18:08:31 +0100 as excerpted:
> > On Sunday, 2012-01-15, Dan Armbrust wrote:
> >> > Hmm. Most software with autocompletion support does that. E.g.
> >> > browsers,
> >> > email programs.
> >>
> >> They also ask your pe
John McCabe-Dansted posted on Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:18:58 +0800 as
excerpted:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
>> Actually, I wonder if this idea could get a bit more traction in view
>> of the new ksecrets thing? That'd play off the whole fascination with
>>
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Actually, I wonder if this idea could get a bit more traction in view of
> the new ksecrets thing? That'd play off the whole fascination with the
> new and shiny technology thing, instead of being seen as the drudge-work
> tha
Kevin Krammer posted on Sun, 15 Jan 2012 18:08:31 +0100 as excerpted:
> On Sunday, 2012-01-15, Dan Armbrust wrote:
>> > Hmm. Most software with autocompletion support does that. E.g.
>> > browsers,
>> > email programs.
>>
>> They also ask your permission first.
>
> Interesting. Neither Konqueror
It is an important issue. Specially under countries protecting personal
data by law, like spain for example in where law says personal data belongs
to the person it refers to instead of the company or program having it.
Despite it being free software I think it should be fair at least
protecting th
Am 15.01.2012 18:08, schrieb Kevin Krammer:
> On Sunday, 2012-01-15, Dan Armbrust wrote:
>>> Hmm. Most software with autocompletion support does that. E.g. browsers,
>>> email programs.
>>
>> They also ask your permission first.
>
> Interesting. Neither Konqueror, Firefox, KMail or Thunderbird hav
On Sunday, 2012-01-15, Dan Armbrust wrote:
> > Hmm. Most software with autocompletion support does that. E.g. browsers,
> > email programs.
>
> They also ask your permission first.
Interesting. Neither Konqueror, Firefox, KMail or Thunderbird have asked me
whether I wanted to store form data.
Ca
> Hmm. Most software with autocompletion support does that. E.g. browsers, email
> programs.
They also ask your permission first. And they have an off switch.
And, they definitely don't autocomplete fields which are know to
contain private info - aka - passwords. Unless you go through another
di
On Saturday, 2012-01-14, Dan Armbrust wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Kevin Krammer
wrote:
> > When introducing a new party to a converstation, in this case the KDE
> > user mailinglist, it is usually very helpful to provide context to said
> > new party.
> >
> > When the discussion h
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 16:03, Dan Armbrust
wrote:
>> Dan, I understand you are frustrated. But this here doesn't help to
>> solve the problem. In fact it makes it a lot less likely that Albert
>> or one of the other Okular developers will work on it. So ultimately
>> you are hurting your case.
>>
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Kevin Krammer wrote:
> When introducing a new party to a converstation, in this case the KDE user
> mailinglist, it is usually very helpful to provide context to said new party.
>
> When the discussion has happened on one mailinglist so far, a good way to do
> tha
When introducing a new party to a converstation, in this case the KDE user
mailinglist, it is usually very helpful to provide context to said new party.
When the discussion has happened on one mailinglist so far, a good way to do
that is to provide a link to the discussion start in the original
>
> Dude.. if you spent half as much time submitting a patch, as you did
> complaining about the issue, it would be fixed yesterday..
>
> Quit complaining, you aren't paying for this software. Fix it yourself, or
> stop using it.
>
> No one cares just because you want to whine like a spoiled little
On 1/13/2012 9:03 AM, Dan Armbrust wrote:
Dan, I understand you are frustrated. But this here doesn't help to
solve the problem. In fact it makes it a lot less likely that Albert
or one of the other Okular developers will work on it. So ultimately
you are hurting your case.
Now let's move this fo
> Dan, I understand you are frustrated. But this here doesn't help to
> solve the problem. In fact it makes it a lot less likely that Albert
> or one of the other Okular developers will work on it. So ultimately
> you are hurting your case.
> Now let's move this forward constructively, please. Ther
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Dan Armbrust
wrote:
> So, you have proven that you don't take a security issue seriously.
To be fair, fixing this bug wouldn't stop sensitive information
appearing in swap. Sensitive information also has a tendency to appear
in /tmp and /var as well. The EFF recom
> Sorry, I can't say that, i know it exists, I've known it for ages, i just
> don't feel it is the next think i have to do in my life (next thing is getting
> my Kindle and reading some stuff), if you think it is important, do it
> yourself or get some money and hire someone to fix it, i know a few
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
>
> Want me to unsubscribe you from the list? Reached this point in what the only
> thing you want to do is harass me i think it is the only sensible thing to do.
>
> Albert
>
Now _there_ is a mature response. Users report a serious data
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:26 PM, wrote:
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=267350
>
>--- Comment #1 from Jackson Peacock
>2011-04-04 03:11:36 ---
>I just noticed the same issue. I had stored some filled out forms on an
>encrypted drive. I ran into a bug where the fields I entered didn't we
25 matches
Mail list logo
