> On Jan. 24, 2014, 4:32 p.m., David Faure wrote:
> > Urgh - a static object in a library? How did we not notice before... Needs
> > to be fixed indeed.
> >
> > I would have used Q_GLOBAL_STATIC (which has methods like isDestroyed()),
> > but I guess that's equivalent to your sharedpointer + s
On 01/26/14 00:38, Matthew Dawson wrote:
> On January 25, 2014 10:02:09 PM Thomas Lübking wrote:
>> On Samstag, 25. Januar 2014 21:03:44 CEST, Matthew Dawson wrote:
>>> At least for ext4, xattrs are the default mode
>> Indeed - removed user_xattr and they're still there.
>>
>> Do you happen to know
Hi everyone,
some time ago I was in need for a graphing component for my application
(KTouch). As the applications UI is done entirely in QML, I was looking for an
QML component to do so. Since there was no satisfactory of-the-shelf solution
I decided to implement my own graphs. Currently, the
On Sunday 26 January 2014 17:24:11 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > Other than that, looks good to me to move to kdeedu *but* we need
> > > to decide what to do with kqmlgraphplugin first, since we can't
> > > have a kdeedu app depending on a playground lib.
> >
> > Are there technical reasons why w
2014/1/24 Sebastian Kügler :
> On Friday, January 24, 2014 01:24:54 Vadim Zhukov wrote:
>> in the best case you'll have two totally different codepaths
>> that you'll have to manage.
>
> This should be "worst case", I think. In the best case, there's xattr support,
> meaning another code path isn't
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:40 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> See subject. We're trying to decide whether we should enable journald by
> default on Linux distributions that carry it. If we do, it means any
> application that is not launched from a terminal would automatically write
> to
> journald i
There is an existing page about slitting runtime here:
http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Epics/New_Runtime_Organization
linked to from http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Epics
Alex's wiki page looks far more populated.
We should make sure we avoid wiki duplication.
David
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Diumenge, 26 de gener de 2014, a les 17:01:39, Christoph Feck va
> escriure:
> > On Sunday 26 January 2014 16:39:08 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > So I did have a look at Artikulate yesterday and just found some
> > > minor nagging us
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Kevin Krammer wrote:
> On Monday, 2014-01-20, 14:40:17, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > See subject. We're trying to decide whether we should enable journald by
> > default on Linux distributions that carry it. If we do, it means any
> > application that is not launch
El Divendres, 24 de gener de 2014, a les 15:59:12, Vadim Zhukov va escriure:
> 2014/1/24 Sebastian Kügler :
> > On Friday, January 24, 2014 01:24:54 Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> >> in the best case you'll have two totally different codepaths
> >> that you'll have to manage.
> >
> > This should be "worst
On Freitag, 24. Januar 2014 12:59:12 CEST, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
It's doubtful at least whether xattr support is a good thing, because
it's too easily gets misused: for example, there were viruses on
Windows which effectively hidden themselves in NTFS streams.
IOW:
"It's doubtful at least whether
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115311/
---
(Updated Jan. 27, 2014, 10:02 p.m.)
Review request for kde-workspace, Tho
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114715/#review48434
---
This review has been submitted with commit
8beb63bcb08568eac8
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114715/
---
(Updated Jan. 28, 2014, 1:22 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been ma
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114715/#review48435
---
This review has been submitted with commit
d10d52e0cc6b57f01d
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115311/#review48446
---
This review has been submitted with commit
77202a2102306a2884
Am Freitag, 24. Januar 2014, 15:59:12 schrieb Vadim Zhukov:
> 2014/1/24 Sebastian Kügler :
> > On Friday, January 24, 2014 01:24:54 Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> >> in the best case you'll have two totally different codepaths
> >> that you'll have to manage.
> >
> > This should be "worst case", I think. I
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115311/
---
(Updated Jan. 28, 2014, 7:03 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been ma
18 matches
Mail list logo
