> On Feb. 8, 2014, 2:34 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote:
> > Here's my vote then.
> > Unless there's concern, push it "in some days™" (ie. tuesday or so, should
> > leave enough time to cry out)
>
> kdeuser56 kdeuser56 wrote:
> "push it" sounds like I should push it, however I can't do it, as I
Harald Sitter wrote:
> Right, but short of patching KDM to gain proper logind support, should
> one build with or without CK,
build without it.
> i.e. does CK add anything useful if the
> rest of the system is not using it anyway
no. As I understand it, this is the only case where you'd want
> On Feb. 8, 2014, 2:34 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote:
> > Here's my vote then.
> > Unless there's concern, push it "in some days™" (ie. tuesday or so, should
> > leave enough time to cry out)
>
> kdeuser56 kdeuser56 wrote:
> "push it" sounds like I should push it, however I can't do it, as I
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115689/#review50079
---
This review has been submitted with commit
24d780debd65e5c2e9
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115689/
---
(Updated Feb. 17, 2014, 5:29 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been ma
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115728/
---
(Updated Feb. 17, 2014, 4:24 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been ma
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115728/#review50067
---
This review has been submitted with commit
093403570a6007baf1
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115726/
---
(Updated Feb. 17, 2014, 4:12 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been ma
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115726/#review50065
---
This review has been submitted with commit
aa0a7429df3a8ebbae
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115726/#review50061
---
Ship it!
- David Edmundson
On Feb. 13, 2014, 5:13 p.m., Àle
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> 2014-02-17 13:55 GMT+01:00 Lukáš Tinkl :
>> Dne 17.2.2014 11:51, Harald Sitter napsal(a):
>>
>>> Ahoys
>>>
>>> I was looking for some input on KDM+CK in a Logind world. When a
>>> system is using Logind I guess KDM+CK doesn't do much useful
2014-02-17 13:55 GMT+01:00 Lukáš Tinkl :
> Dne 17.2.2014 11:51, Harald Sitter napsal(a):
>
>> Ahoys
>>
>> I was looking for some input on KDM+CK in a Logind world. When a
>> system is using Logind I guess KDM+CK doesn't do much useful, so the
>> question arose whether distributions with such a line
Dne 14.2.2014 15:49, Burkhard Lück napsal(a):
Am Freitag, 14. Februar 2014, 13:09:19 schrieb Vishesh Handa:
On Thursday, February 13, 2014 11:28:40 AM Burkhard Lück wrote:
That loads the translation catalog, which also contains messages from the
plasmoid outside the library.
Apparently that ha
Dne 17.2.2014 11:51, Harald Sitter napsal(a):
Ahoys
I was looking for some input on KDM+CK in a Logind world. When a
system is using Logind I guess KDM+CK doesn't do much useful, so the
question arose whether distributions with such a lineup should build
without CK support. In short:
If the res
Ahoys
I was looking for some input on KDM+CK in a Logind world. When a
system is using Logind I guess KDM+CK doesn't do much useful, so the
question arose whether distributions with such a lineup should build
without CK support. In short:
If the rest of the system uses Logind, should KDM be built
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Dilluns, 17 de febrer de 2014, a les 08:15:55, Ben Cooksley va escriure:
>> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
>> > Hi,
>>
>> Hi Albert,
>>
>> > Why is the kcoloredit history lost when moving from svn to git?
>
16 matches
Mail list logo
