@Aaron: afaik the user is on ME FW 1.25.1932 the whole time. They have
not tried to upgrade it yet.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063308
Title:
lenovo p1g5 suspend issu
@Aaron: You mean downgrade ME FW? To which version?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063308
Title:
lenovo p1g5 suspend issues with docking stations
Status in linux packag
>From what I have just received: AMT is disabled on that machine.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063308
Title:
lenovo p1g5 suspend issues with docking stations
Status i
Sure Mark. I have some information handy:
grep "model name" /proc/cpuinfo | head -n 1
model name : 12th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-12900H
GPU:
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: NVIDIA Corporation Device [10de:2438]
(rev a1) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
Subsystem: Lenovo Devi
The fix has been merged into upstream Linux tree as
20c2dbff342aec13bf93c2f6c951da198916a455.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2044131
Title:
i915 regression introduced wit
** Description changed:
+ [ Impact ]
+ Commit 8f4b1068e7fc3df1a77ac8151767e56b208cc87f introduced some timing checks
which have been proven invalid for at least some hardware setups. A user trying
to run Focal with HWE 5.15 kernel is not able to get any video output.
+ After going through bisect
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2044131 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2044131
** Patch added:
"0001-drm-i915-Skip-some-timing-checks-on-BXT-GLK-DSI-tran.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2045891/+attachment/5727218/+files/0001-drm-i915-Skip-some-timing-
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2044131 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2044131
Adding dmesg and lspci from affected system
** Attachment added: "dmesg"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2045891/+attachment/5727216/+files/dmesg
--
You received this bug notifica
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2044131 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2044131
** Attachment added: "lspci"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2045891/+attachment/5727217/+files/lspci
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Pack
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2044131 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2044131
Public bug reported:
[ Impact ]
Commit 8f4b1068e7fc3df1a77ac8151767e56b208cc87f introduced some timing checks
which have been proven invalid for at least some hardware setups. A user trying
to run Focal w
Fields in the "Modeline" output are:
(m)->name, drm_mode_vrefresh(m), (m)->clock, \
(m)->hdisplay, (m)->hsync_start, (m)->hsync_end, (m)->htotal, \
(m)->vdisplay, (m)->vsync_start, (m)->vsync_end, (m)->vtotal, \
(m)->type, (m)->flags
--
You received this bug notifi
Looks like this is hardware-specific and read from BIOS:
[drm:intel_bios_init [i915]] Found panel mode in BIOS VBT legacy lfp table:
[drm:drm_mode_debug_printmodeline [drm]] Modeline "800x1280": 50 54000 800 810
820 830 1280 1290 1300 1310 0x8 0xa
--
You received this bug notification because yo
The commit in question (8f4b1068e7fc3df1a77ac8151767e56b208cc87f)
introduces the following logic in intel_mode_valid function
(drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c):
+ if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 5) {
+ if (mode->hdisplay < 64 ||
+ mode->htotal - mode->hdisplay < 32)
+ return MODE_H_ILLEG
** Attachment added: "lspci"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2044131/+attachment/5721686/+files/lspci
** Tags added: se sts
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.n
Public bug reported:
There is a regression preventing a user to upgrade from 5.4 kernel to anything
that's higher than 5.5. When using such kernel the image orientation is wrong
(rotated by 90°C). Also the kernel log contains:
wrz 15 09:19:49 desktop kernel: i915 :00:02.0: [drm] Unknown revi
** Attachment added: "lshw"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2044131/+attachment/5721685/+files/lshw
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2044131
Title:
** Attachment added: "stacktrace"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2044131/+attachment/5721684/+files/stacktrace
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/20441
Thanks for looking into that Hui. I have checked that with the user who
experience it - you are right, the mic was working fine *without* the
need to install firmware-sof-signed.
Regarding firmware: what do you mean by "original sof-firmware" in this
context? Do you need dmesg from vanilla focal o
The packages I used for testing are available at ppa:dgadomski/firmware-
mic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-firmware in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959681
Title:
mic not working on HP-EliteBook-830-G7
Public bug reported:
There is no audio input from the built-in mic available on Bionic &
Focal on certain intel audio hw (00:1f.3 Multimedia audio controller
[0401]: Intel Corporation Device [8086:02c8]) despite trying different
kernel cmdline options (snd_hda_intel.dmic_detect=0 or
snd_intel_dspc
I have tested this in a VM with kernel 4.15.0-131.135 installed and I
can confirm the issue is gone.
** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic
** Tags added: verification-done-bionic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux
Patches posted to the kernel-team list:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2020-December/115620.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908219
Title:
[drm:qxl_enc
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Bionic)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dariusz Gadomski (dgadomski)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908219
Title:
[drm:qxl_enc_commit [
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
* Ubuntu 18.04 used as a guest in KVM with Spice/QXL in use may lead to a DRM
error displayed during xorg launch:
[drm:qxl_enc_commit [qxl]] *ERROR* head number too large or missing monitors
config: (ptrval), 0
[Fix]
* 00e5d217fa19bcbec13135898e1b9ca2c1c3
I have verified the following packages on Trusty:
hwdata - 0.249-1ubuntu1
gnome-desktop-3 - 3.8.4-0ubuntu3.3
With the above packages installed from -proposed the labels presented in
the 'Displays' panel of u-c-c are correct: when real size is available
in EDID data diagonal is displayed, otherwise
I have also verified unity-settings-daemon
15.04.1+16.04.20160701-0ubuntu3 for Xenial.
After connecting a faulty-EDID display - I saw the product name. With a
display device with correct dimensions in EDID - screen diagonal in
inches was displayed.
--
You received this bug notification because y
unity-settings-daemon should NOT be nominated for trusty, but I can't
fix that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to hwdata in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1755490
Title:
Incorrect information about display shown i
** Also affects: gnome-desktop3 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to hwdata in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1755490
Title:
Incorrect information about display sh
gnome-desktop SRU proposal for trusty
** Patch removed: "trusty_gnome-desktop3_3.8.4-0ubuntu3.3.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hwdata/+bug/1755490/+attachment/5217608/+files/trusty_gnome-desktop3_3.8.4-0ubuntu3.3.debdiff
** Patch added: "trusty_gnome-desktop3_3.8.4-0ubuntu
hwdata SRU proposal for trusty
** Patch added: "trusty_hwdata_0.249-1ubuntu1.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hwdata/+bug/1755490/+attachment/5217607/+files/trusty_hwdata_0.249-1ubuntu1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Package
gnome-desktop SRU proposal for trusty.
** Patch added: "trusty_gnome-desktop3_3.8.4-0ubuntu3.3.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hwdata/+bug/1755490/+attachment/5217608/+files/trusty_gnome-desktop3_3.8.4-0ubuntu3.3.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you ar
It was brought to my attention by Dan that trusty is also worth fixing.
The patch to hwdata is identical, however somewhere between trusty and
xenial the make_display_name implementation has been moved from gnome-
desktop to u-s-d.
Hence, despite display-name.c being almost identical in both cases
I checked hwdata output in Unity Settings Displays menu with 2 different
devices (vendors: LG and Dell) on LiveCDs for xenial, bionic, cosmic
with the proposed patch installed (and with ubuntu-unity-desktop
installed from universe in case of bionic and comsmic).
Worked as expected (i.e. in the Tes
Run the verifications for:
hwdata | 0.267-1ubuntu2 | xenial-proposed
hwdata | 0.290-1ubuntu0.18.04.1 | bionic-proposed
hwdata | 0.290-1ubuntu0.18.10.1 | cosmic-proposed
** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic verification-needed-cosmic
verification-needed-xenial
** Tags added: verifi
Looks like the latest hwdata update (0.267-1ubuntu1) doesn't have full
debdiff applied. The change to hwdata-0.267/pnp.ids is missing, it
contains only changes to hwdata-0.267/pnp.ids.patch.
It doesn't fix the issue this way.
** Tags removed: verification-needed-xenial
** Tags added: verification
Brian: afaik disco version of hwdata has been synced with latest
upstream by Sebastien. Upstream has this change already applied.
With the disco package source:
grep GSM hwdata-0.317/pnp.ids*
hwdata-0.317/pnp.ids:GSMLG Electronics
hwdata-0.317/pnp.ids.patch:-GSM Goldstar Company Ltd
hwdata
I've just verified it on xenial (15.04.1+16.04.20160701-0ubuntu3). Works
as expected. Thanks!
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-xenial
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-xenial
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Package
I have also provided debdiffs for hwdata (disco is already synced with
upstream) so that LG devices are not shown under Goldstar label.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to hwdata in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/17554
hwdata SRU proposal for bionic.
** Patch added: "bionic_hwdata_0.290-1ubuntu1.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hwdata/+bug/1755490/+attachment/5216710/+files/bionic_hwdata_0.290-1ubuntu1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packag
hwdata SRU proposal for cosmic.
** Patch added: "cosmic_hwdata_0.290-1ubuntu1.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hwdata/+bug/1755490/+attachment/5216709/+files/cosmic_hwdata_0.290-1ubuntu1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packag
hwdata SRU proposal for xenial.
** Patch added: "xenial_hwdata_0.267-1ubuntu1.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hwdata/+bug/1755490/+attachment/5216711/+files/xenial_hwdata_0.267-1ubuntu1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packag
Alright, thanks Seb. It makes it verified then.
** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic
** Tags added: verification-done-bionic
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
** Tags removed: verification-needed-cosmic
** Tags added: verification-done-cosmic
--
You r
I have just verified both: bionic (15.04.1+18.04.20180413-0ubuntu1.2)
and cosmic (15.04.1+18.04.20180413-0ubuntu3) u-s-d packages.
In both cases it calculates the diagonal correctly or puts the model
name if the real dimensions are not available.
However, there is a problem I didn't see coming: h
** Description changed:
[Impact]
* There is a number of display devices that misuse the width & height field
in EDID. Instead of real size in centimeters it contains encoded aspect ratio
(e.g. 1600x900, 16x10, 160x90).
This leads to incorrect calculation of diagonal for the purpose of
seb128: I checked and sadly none of the releases (including disco)
contains the hwdb fix - looks like it hasn't been released yet upstream
- latest systemd release (239) has been published before the fix has
been comitted.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
P
seb128: it's also fixed in hwdb upstream
(https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/10051). I need to check if
that's already present in Bionic.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to hwdata in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
** Description changed:
[Impact]
- * There is a number of display devices that misuse the width & height field
in EDID. Instead of real size in centimeters it contains encoded aspect ratio
(e.g. 1600x900, 16x10, 160x90).
+ * There is a number of display devices that misuse the width & hei
** Description changed:
+ [Impact]
+
+ * There is a number of display devices that misuse the width & height field
in EDID. Instead of real size in centimeters it contains encoded aspect ratio
(e.g. 1600x900, 16x10, 160x90).
+ This leads to incorrect calculation of diagonal for the purpose of
It's still valid. hwdata fixed the "vendor name" part of the issue.
u-s-d needs to be patched to fix the "nonsense diagonal calculation"
part.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to hwdata in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
** No longer affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers-384 (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers-384 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1721988
Title:
Ubuntu 17.10 full disk encryption + Nvidia
Thanks @goingwc, I have managed to reproduce it here so I can use my own
plymouth log. Turns out I couldn't get even 18.04 working correctly,
because I had integrated GPU enabled in my motherboard settings
(i7-6700K with HD 530) despite nvidia being set to "primary GPU". I had
to disable the integr
Hi,
Could anyone that has it working on 18.04 add plymouth:debug to their kernel
cmdline, reboot and share the /var/log/plymouth-debug.log?
I'm looking into this, but also experience the issue on 18.04. I'm
curious where the difference comes from.
Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification
** Changed in: unity-settings-daemon (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => In Progress
** Changed in: hwdata (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to hwdata in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.
After examining raw EDID data from 2 different LG TVs I can see that both of
them set bytes 21 and 22 of the EDID data in a wrong way.
They both state that the display size is 160x90 cm which in turn corresponds to
a approximately 72" diagonal.
So unity-settings-daemon does its job correctly and
Another thing is the diagonal length calculation. From my quick look
this is done based on EDID data in unity-settings-daemon.
** Summary changed:
- Incorrect information displayed in unity-control-center
+ Incorrect information about display shown in unity-control-center
--
You received this b
Goldstar seems to be a former name of LG (before the Lucky-Goldstar
merge).
I've made a pull request upstream to update it:
https://github.com/vcrhonek/hwdata/pull/1
** Also affects: unity-settings-daemon (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification
Public bug reported:
After connecting a LG 49UB850T-DA TV the following information is
displayed in the unity-control-center: Goldstar Company Ltd 72"
It's misleading since neither the company name nor the diagonal matches.
** Affects: hwdata (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status:
After the preliminary analysis my understanding is as follows:
since the change found thanks to the bisection the behaviour change in a way
that if an unsupported security mode is requested it results in an error
(invalid argument in this case).
Looks like NTLM was not supported even before the
** Summary changed:
- mount.cifs stopped working with protocol version != 1.0
+ mount.cifs stopped working with protocol version>1 and sec=ntlm
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
Bisecting between v4.10 and v4.11 resulted in finding that this was caused by
the following commit:
[ef65aaede23f75977af56a8c330bb9be8c6e125c] smb2: Enforce sec= mount option
Reverting it on top of v4.11 makes it go away.
Looking more into it.
--
You received this bug notification because you
** Description changed:
On a Xenial installation after upgrading to the HWE 4.13.0-32-generic
kernel it is not possible to use mount.cifs with -o vers=x.y different
than 1.0.
Steps to reproduce:
1. Setup a local Samba share.
2. Run:
- mount.cifs -o user=,vers=2.0 //localhost/theshar
Conclusion after correcting the parameters in my test procedure:
v4.10 - good
v4.11 - bad
v4.15 - bad
I'm performing a bisect between v4.10 and v4.11.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
Added updated dmesg (with verbose error message).
** Attachment added: "dmesg.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1746482/+attachment/5047511/+files/dmesg_latest.log
** Attachment removed: "dmesg.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1746482/+atta
Looks like I've been mislead by the man page of mount.cifs and
linux/fs/cifs/connect.c which state:
man mount.cifs:
vers=
SMB protocol version. Allowed values are:
· 1.0 - The classic CIFS/SMBv1 protocol. This is the
default.
4.13 kernel code:
pr_warn("No dialect specifi
Added updated dmesg (with verbose error message).
** Attachment added: "dmesg.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1746482/+attachment/5047510/+files/dmesg_latest.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed t
Surprisingly it works perfectly fine for 4.15.0-041500-generic.
I have tested vers= parameter from 1.0 to 3.0 - no issues at all.
I went forward and tested v4.14 - it is not affected by the issue as
well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which i
dmesg output after reproducing the issue with
echo 7 > /proc/fs/cifs/cifsFYI
** Attachment added: "dmesg.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1746482/+attachment/5046387/+files/dmesg.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, w
As discussed with cascardo I tested the mainline builds from [1].
After some tests the results were:
v4.12.14 - good
v4.13 - bad
So the regression seems to be introduced in v4.13.
[1] http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Public bug reported:
On a Xenial installation after upgrading to the HWE 4.13.0-32-generic
kernel it is not possible to use mount.cifs with -o vers=x.y different
than 1.0.
Steps to reproduce:
1. Setup a local Samba share.
2. Run:
mount.cifs -o user=,vers=2.0 //localhost/theshare/ /mnt/theshare
(p
Since I don't have access to the actual Cisco hardware for testing I
have been experimenting with hostapd lately.
After rebuilding it with CONFIG_P2P_MANAGER=y I was able to reproduce
similar behavior as observed with Cisco hw (except for blacklisting) and
as described in WiFi P2P spec v1.7 sectio
Public bug reported:
There is a setting available on selected Cisco hardware named "Wi-Fi
Direct Client Policy". One of the allowed option there is 'not-allow'.
It's intention is to block WiFi P2P capable devices from connecting to
it. If a device trying to associate with an AP with this setting e
Patch proposal for Artful.
** Patch added: "artful_bluez_5.45-0ubuntu3.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/1674680/+attachment/4928420/+files/artful_bluez_5.45-0ubuntu3.debdiff
** Patch removed: "artful_bluez_5.45-0ubuntu3.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubun
Artful patch proposal.
** Patch added: "artful_bluez_5.45-0ubuntu3.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/1674680/+attachment/4928336/+files/artful_bluez_5.45-0ubuntu3.debdiff
** Patch removed: "zesty_bluez_5.43-0ubuntu2.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+s
** Description changed:
+ [Impact]
+
+ * The package contains misleading documentation mentioning the use of
+ /etc/bluetooth/rfcomm.conf for rfcomm setup while the support for config
+ file has been dropped after 14.04 release. I have directly received a
+ question about it from a user mislead
Patch proposal for Zesty.
** Tags added: sts sts-sponsor
** Patch added: "zesty_bluez_5.43-0ubuntu2.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/1674680/+attachment/4841667/+files/zesty_bluez_5.43-0ubuntu2.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
** Summary changed:
- Dropped rfcomm.conf still mentioned
+ Deprecated rfcomm.conf still mentioned
** Description changed:
Support for config files has been dropped upstream in 2012 (however
version shipped with Trusty still supports it), but the latest versions
(including Xenial and Zest
Public bug reported:
Support for config files has been dropped upstream in 2012 (however
version shipped with Trusty still supports it), but the latest versions
(including Xenial and Zesty) still mention it in the docs and in the
legacy /etc/init/bluetooth.conf file.
** Affects: bluez (Ubuntu)
Thank you Stef. I have verified the fix on trusty with trusty kernel. I
will try to set up a precise environment with trusty kernel and
reproduce this issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
Stef, thanks for the update.
Can you please confirm that you have upgraded your kernel to version
3.13.0-51.84 or later? This is the first release that has this fix. The version
you mentioned earlier (3.13.0.51.44) is expected to be still affected by this
bug.
Thank you.
--
You received this
stef: can you please check after you observe the problem if your key quota is
not exceeded? You may do this with:
$ sudo cat /proc/key-users
This fix is known to solve the expired keys problem, but if the cause of
the issue you are experiencing is the capacity of the key quota you may
have to ex
The fix has been tagged as:
- Ubuntu-3.13.0-50.82 for Trusty
- Ubuntu-3.16.0-35.46 for Utopic
I don't see those version available in -updates yet, so please give it
some more time to be release.
Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is
** Description changed:
+ [Impact]
+
+ * This bug is likely to cause an incorrect UID/GID mapping for NFS
+ shares in case of large numbers of differend UIDs/GIDs or in case of
+ expired UID/GID mappings (stored as keys in the kernel).
+
+ [Test Case]
+
+ 1. Setup a nfs4 server exporting /hom
Adding syslog with enhannced debugging information from bluetoothd.
** Attachment added: "Syslog with -d passed to bluetoothd"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/1410779/+attachment/4298384/+files/syslog
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kern
Thanks Victor for your report.
I am aware that you were trying:
sudo rfkill unblock 3
[sudo] password for vestival:
vestival@vestival01:~$ sudo rfkill list
0: tpacpi_wwan_sw: Wireless WAN
Soft blocked: no
Hard blocked: no
1: phy0: Wireless LAN
Soft blocked: no
Hard blocked: no
3: hci0: B
Carl, I have backported the fixes to trusty kernel. Could you please
give them a try in your environment?
The build is available in my PPA (ppa:dgadomski/kernel-nfs).
Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubunt
I believe this is the commit in question:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=0b0a84154eff56913e91df29de5c3a03a0029e38
Looks like a good canditate for considering a cherry-pick.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packag
@Bryan
Yes, you're right. It should hit vivid and since it is already
configurable by sysctl there is no point in backporting.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1124250
Title
Hello Bryan,
The commit that has fixed this was
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=738c5d190f6540539a04baf36ce21d46b5da04bd
I think we can make use of it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscrib
/plymouth/commit/?id=e982dc255c0f471e67eb7bd0858c170d103d39ce)
but according to the plymouth debug log (attached) radeon fails to open.
** Affects: plymouth
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Affects: plymouth (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Dariusz
89 matches
Mail list logo
