On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 10:58:54PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> This is my current patch queue for 4.0. Please pull.
>
> Alex
>
>
> The following changes since commit f710a12d73dfa1c3a5d2417f2482b970f03bb850:
>
> Merge tag 'kvm-arm-fixes-4.0-rc5' of
> git://git.kernel.org/p
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 03:32:45PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Hi Marcelo / Gleb,
>
> This is my current patch queue for ppc. Please pull and apply to next, so it
> makes its way into 3.10. Sorry for the late request.
>
> There is still one RCU patch outstanding that needs a respin, so expect
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 07:27:23PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 05/01/2013 07:15:53 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 07:53:38PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
> >> index 1020119..506
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 07:53:38PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> KVM core expects arch code to acquire the srcu lock when calling
> gfn_to_memslot and similar functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Scott Wood
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kvm/44x_tlb.c |5 +
> arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c| 19
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:13:40PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 25.04.2013, at 21:03, Scott Wood wrote:
>
> > On 04/25/2013 09:49:23 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >> On 25.04.2013, at 13:30, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On 19.04.2013, at 20:51, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On 04/1
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 07:26:35PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>> So I may send a pull request against 3.9 with the 3 commits that already
> >>> are in kvm/next?
> >>
> >> If you decide that the fixes are important enough to justify the
> >> existance of duplicate commits, i don't see a probl
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 03:50:13PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 11.04.2013, at 15:45, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:59:04PM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> >> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 03:33:12AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >>>
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:59:04PM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 03:33:12AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:35:09AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> > > I agree. So if it doesn't hurt to have the same commits in kvm/next and
> > > kvm/master, I'd be
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 08:00:25PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 02/21/2013 05:03:32 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 07:28:52PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> On 02/20/2013 06:14:37 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >> >On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 05:5
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 07:28:52PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 02/20/2013 06:14:37 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 05:53:20PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> >It is then not necessary to set device attributes on a live
> >guest and
> >> >
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 05:53:20PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> >Why exactly you need to set attributes Scott?
>
> That's best answered by looking at patch 6/6 and discussing the
> actual attributes that are defined so far.
>
> The need to set the base address of the registers is
> straightforward.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 06:20:51PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 02/20/2013 01:58:54 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >This is probably a stupid question, but why the
> >KVM_SET_IRQCHIP/KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING interface is not appropriate for
> >your purposes?
> >
> >x86 s
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 05:20:50PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 02/20/2013 03:17:27 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 05:01:40PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> On 02/18/2013 06:21:59 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >> >Copying Christoffer since
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 06:28:24PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 03:09:49PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 03:16:37PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> > > On 02/19/2013 06:24:18 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > >On Mon, Fe
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 03:09:49PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 03:16:37PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> > On 02/19/2013 06:24:18 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > >On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 05:01:40PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> > >> The ability to set/get attributes is needed. Sorry,
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 05:01:40PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 02/18/2013 06:21:59 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >Copying Christoffer since ARM has in kernel irq chip too.
> >
> >On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:49:15PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> Currently, devices that are emulated inside KVM are confi
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 01:56:14PM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 05:59:11PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> > On 02/15/2013 05:18:31 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> > >On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 02:05:41PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> > >> On 02/14/2013 06:01:08 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Pulled, thanks.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 01:16:16AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Hi Marcelo / Gleb,
>
> This is my current patch queue for ppc. Please pull.
>
> Highlights of this queue drop are:
>
> - BookE: Fast mapping support for 4k backed memory
> - BookE: Handle alignment interrupts
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 12:48:25AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Hi Marcelo / Gleb,
>
> This is my current patch queue for ppc against 3.8. Please pull.
>
> It contains a bug fix for an issue that Ben Collins ran into, where
> a guest would just abort because it traps during an unknown instruct
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 01:40:49AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Hi Marcelo / Gleb,
>
> This is my current patch queue for ppc. Please pull.
>
> Major changes this time around include:
>
> - Book3S PR: Multiple fixes for POWER7 hosts
> - Book3S HV: Prepare for full state exposure (live mig
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:22:55AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
> On 31.10.2012, at 02:32, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:02:13AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >> Hi Avi / Marcelo,
> >>
> >> This is
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:26:04PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 10/31/2012 12:22 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 31.10.2012, at 02:32, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:02:13AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >&g
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:02:13AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Hi Avi / Marcelo,
>
> This is my current patch queue for ppc. Please pull.
>
> Headline changes are:
>
> * Fix 440 target
> * Fix uapi conflict
Can you regenerate against queue branch? (btw i forgot to update
fsl_hcalls.h..
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 09:46:01AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 23.08.2012, at 03:04, Scott Wood wrote:
>
> > We were only allocating half the bytes we need, which was made more
> > obvious by a recent fix to the memset in clear_tlb1_bitmap().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Scott Wood
>
> Than
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 04:19:29PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 14.09.2012, at 09:44, Paul Mackerras wrote:
>
> > This moves the definitions of KVM_CREATE_SPAPR_TCE and
> > KVM_ALLOCATE_RMA in include/linux/kvm.h from the section listing the
> > vcpu ioctls to the section listing VM ioctls
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 10:40:40PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Now that we have an architecture-specific field in the kvm_memory_slot
> structure, we can use it to store the array of page physical addresses
> that we need for Book3S HV KVM on PPC970 processors. This reduces the
> size of struct
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 07:29:53PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:55:37AM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> > There are a number of options to consider:
> >
> > 1) Merge the current patchset from Paul, which has two downsides:
> > 1-1)
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 06:32:25AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 15:39 -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 05:06:18PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 14:59 -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 05:06:18PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 14:59 -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >
> > The guest should not expect memory accesses to an address
> > to behave sanely while changing a BAR anyway.
> >
> > Yes
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 02:16:50PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Hi Avi,
>
> This is my patch queue for ppc patches that should go into 3.6. Please pull.
>
> * Fix memset in e500_tlb
> * Fix icache flush when mapping executable pages
> * Fix wrong branch in book3s hv code
>
> Alex
>
>
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 07:10:43PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 08/14/2012 06:04 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> > We need a central place to check for pending requests in. Add one that
> > only does the timer check we already do in a different place.
> >
> > Later, this central function can be exten
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:26:05PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 08/14/2012 01:04 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 01:34:11PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >> On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 10:37:54AM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Au
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 01:34:11PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 10:37:54AM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 03:35:53PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > There's no plan. I just wanted to confirm this before converting
>
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 10:37:54AM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 03:35:53PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > There's no plan. I just wanted to confirm this before converting
> > to per-memslot flush.
> >
> > 1)
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 11:09:09AM +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Aug 2012 22:25:32 -0300
> Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> > I'll send a patch to flush per memslot in the next days, you can work
> > out the PPC details in the meantime.
Not anymore.
> Ar
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:34:39AM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 03:16:12PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> > The !memslot->npages case is handled in __kvm_set_memory_region
> > (please read that part, before kvm_arch_prepare
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 10:25:32PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:34:39AM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 03:16:12PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >
> > > The !memslot->npages case is handled in __kvm_set_memory_reg
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 08:06:55PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> The generic KVM code uses SRCU (sleeping RCU) to protect accesses
> to the memslots data structures against updates due to userspace
> adding, modifying or removing memory slots. We need to do that too,
> both to avoid accessing sta
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 08:06:03PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> >From 44067a8ee15021583636bea4cc1d47e5370b8397 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Paul Mackerras
> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:40:54 +1000
> Subject:
>
> At present the HV style of KVM doesn't handle deletion or modification
> of memo
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 08:08:16PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> The generic KVM code uses SRCU (sleeping RCU) to protect accesses
> to the memslots data structures against updates due to userspace
> adding, modifying or removing memory slots. We need to do that too,
> both to avoid accessing sta
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 02:41:13PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 06:20:18AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-08-02 at 15:35 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > > This is actually documented in api.txt, though not in relat
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 06:20:18AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-08-02 at 15:35 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > This is actually documented in api.txt, though not in relation to
> > reset:
> >
> > NOTE: For KVM_EXIT_IO, KVM_EXIT_MMIO and KVM_EXIT_OSI, the
> > corresponding o
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 06:55:16PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 07/25/2012 03:37 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 04:29:08PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> On 07/20/2012 12:00 AM, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
> >>> This patch adds the watchdog
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 04:29:08PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 07/20/2012 12:00 AM, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
> > This patch adds the watchdog emulation in KVM. The watchdog
> > emulation is enabled by KVM_ENABLE_CAP(KVM_CAP_PPC_WDT) ioctl.
> > The kernel timer are used for watchdog emulation and emu
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 05:52:39PM +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> v3->v4: Resolved trace_kvm_age_page() issue -- patch 6,7
> v2->v3: Fixed intersection calculations. -- patch 3, 8
>
> Takuya
>
> Takuya Yoshikawa (8):
> KVM: MMU: Use __gfn_to_rmap() to clean up kvm_handle_hva()
> KVM:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 05:52:39PM +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> v3->v4: Resolved trace_kvm_age_page() issue -- patch 6,7
> v2->v3: Fixed intersection calculations. -- patch 3, 8
>
> Takuya
>
> Takuya Yoshikawa (8):
> KVM: MMU: Use __gfn_to_rmap() to clean up kvm_handle_hva()
> KVM:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:35:01PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On PowerPC, we sometimes use a waitqueue per core, not per thread,
> so we can't always use the vcpu internal waitqueue.
>
> This code has been generalized by Christoffer Dall recently, but
> unfortunately broke compilation for Powe
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 04:44:24PM -0500, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> Any news on the status of this?
>
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >
> > On 10.02.2012, at 02:40, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> >
> >> The kvm_vcpu_kick function performs roughly the same funcitonality on
> >
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 01:09:47AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> There's always a chance we're unable to read a guest instruction. The guest
> could have its TLB mapped execute-, but not readable, something odd happens
> and our TLB gets flushed. So it's a good idea to be prepared for that case
>
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 09:06:04PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-02-06 19:25, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> >> index c38efd7..a1761ff 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/kv
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:27:39PM -0500, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> The kvm_vcpu_kick function performs roughly the same funcitonality on
> most all architectures, so we shouldn't have separate copies.
>
> PowerPC keeps a pointer to interchanging waitqueues on the vcpu_arch
> structure and to acco
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 07:42:04PM +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> The last one is an RFC patch:
>
> I think it is better to refactor the rmap things, if needed, before
> other architectures than x86 starts large pages support.
>
> Takuya
Looks good to me.
--
To unsubscribe from this lis
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:22:41PM -0500, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> The kvm_vcpu_kick function performs roughly the same funcitonality on
> most all architectures, so we shouldn't have separate copies.
>
> PowerPC keeps a pointer to interchanging waitqueues on the vcpu_arch
> structure and to acco
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 03:31:03PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Hi Avi,
>
> This is my current patch queue for ppc. Please pull.
>
> Alex
>
>
> The following changes since commit 188fc33198ddb1469562d40de33bcc29e7e2ed5f:
> Christian Borntraeger (1):
> kvm-s390: provide access guest
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 01:58:32PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> I still don't fully understand. You pass in a list of register modifications.
> The same would happen from guest code. You have a code stream of register
> modifications. They should both end up calling the same functions in the
>
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 08:54:24AM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 02:57:11PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >
> > This touches areas that I'm sure non-PPC people would want to see as
> > well. Could you please CC kvm@vger too next time?
> >
> > Avi, Marcelo, mind to review
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:55:49AM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> >From dfd5bcfac841f8a36593edf60d9fb15e0d633287 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Paul Mackerras
> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:30:38 +1100
> Subject:
>
> Currently, kvmppc_h_enter takes a spinlock that is global to the guest,
> kvm->m
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:45:45AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 10.11.2011, at 18:35, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 05:49:42PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>>> Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt | 47
> >>>> +
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 05:49:42PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >> Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt | 47
> >> ++
> >> arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c| 51
> >> +
> >> include/linux/kvm.h | 32 +
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 08:53:11AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Right now we transfer a static struct every time we want to get or set
> registers. Unfortunately, over time we realize that there are more of
> these than we thought of before and the extensibility and flexibility of
> transferring
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 09:03:51PM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > In case the VM stops for whatever reason, the host system is not
> > supposed to adjust time related hardware state to compensate, in an
> > attempt to present apparent continuous time.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 07:11:08AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 16:55 -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > and the wall clock stays behind my host wall clock by the amount of
> > > time it took to resume.
> >
> > This is expected, similar t
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 03:00:54PM -0400, Eric B Munson wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2011, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 04:49:55PM -0400, Eric B Munson wrote:
> > > On Fri, 09 Sep 2011, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > >
> > > > On T
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 04:49:55PM -0400, Eric B Munson wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Sep 2011, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 02:27:49PM -0600, emun...@mgebm.net wrote:
> > > On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 14:24:12 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > > >On 08/
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 02:27:49PM -0600, emun...@mgebm.net wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 14:24:12 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >On 08/30/2011 07:26 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >>On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 05:27:11PM -0600, Eric B Munson wrote:
> >>>Currently, when
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:37:13AM -0600, Eric B Munson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 06:26, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 05:27:11PM -0600, Eric B Munson wrote:
> >> Currently, when qemu stops a guest kernel that guest will issue a soft
> >>
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 09:43:19AM -0500, Ryan Harper wrote:
> * Marcelo Tosatti [2011-08-30 09:40]:
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 09:12:17AM -0500, Ryan Harper wrote:
> > > * Marcelo Tosatti [2011-08-30 07:35]:
> > > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 05:27:1
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 09:12:17AM -0500, Ryan Harper wrote:
> * Marcelo Tosatti [2011-08-30 07:35]:
> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 05:27:11PM -0600, Eric B Munson wrote:
> > > Currently, when qemu stops a guest kernel that guest will issue a soft
> > > lockup
> >
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 05:27:11PM -0600, Eric B Munson wrote:
> Currently, when qemu stops a guest kernel that guest will issue a soft lockup
> message when it resumes. This set provides the ability for qemu to
> comminucate
> to the guest that it has been stopped. When the guest hits the watch
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 10:24:58AM -0400, Eric B Munson wrote:
> This set is just a rough first pass at avoiding soft lockup warnings when a
> host
> pauses the execution of a guest. A flag is set by the host in the shared page
> used for the pvclock when the host goes to stop the guest. When th
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 04:12:37PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Hi Avi,
>
> Here is my current patch queue for KVM on PPC. It contains support for
> hardware accelerated KVM on 970 and POWER7 (no hardware) which is one
> of the most interesting features we had added for a while now.
>
> This ne
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 01:51:25PM -0600, Peter Tyser wrote:
> Previously SPRGs 4-7 were improperly read and written in
> kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_get_regs() and kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_regs();
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser
> ---
> I noticed this while grepping for somthing unrelated and assume its
>
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 01:04:24PM +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> Structure kvm_ppc_pvinfo is copied to userland with flags and
> pad fields unitialized. It leads to leaking of contents of
> kernel stack memory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vasiliy Kulikov
> ---
> I cannot compile this driver, so it is
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:57:29AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 19.10.2010, at 00:35, Scott Wood wrote:
>
> > Fix an unresolved symbol with CONFIG_KVM_GUEST plus CONFIG_RELOCATABLE on
> > Book E.
>
> Thanks, applied to the kvm-ppc-next tree.
>
> Avi, could you please pull my tree asap? T
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 03:18:44PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Book3s suffered from my really bad shadow MMU implementation so far. So
> I finally got around to implement a combined hash and list mechanism that
> allows for much faster lookup of mapped pages.
>
> To show that it really is faste
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 12:00:47PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 06/23/2010 12:01 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> >(2010/06/23 17:48), Avi Kivity wrote:
> >
> >>>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
> >>>index 801d9f3..bea6f7c 100644
> >>>--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 06:03:58PM +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> This patch set is for making dirty logging development, and of course
> maintenance, easier. Please see individual patches for details.
>
> Takuya
>
> ---
> arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c | 54 ++--
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:23:26AM +, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
> Fix compile warning:
> CC [M] arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.o
> arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c: In function 'kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run':
> arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c:290: warning: 'gpr' may be used uninitialized in
> this function
> a
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 09:59:13PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Instead of instantiating a whole thread_struct on the stack use only the
> required parts of it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Schwab
> Tested-by: Alexander Graf
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_fpu.h | 27 +
> a
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 09:05:38PM +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> (2010/06/01 19:55), Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> >>>Sorry but I have to say that mmu_lock spin_lock problem was completely
> >>>out of
> >>>my mind. Although I looked throu
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 04:05:29PM +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> (2010/05/17 18:06), Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> >
> >>User allocated bitmaps have the advantage of reducing pinned memory.
> >>However we have plenty more pinned memory allocated in memory slots, so
> >>by itself, user allocated bitm
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 02:17:35PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> All vcpu ioctls need to be locked, so instead of locking each one specifically
> we lock at the generic dispatcher.
>
> This patch only updates generic ioctls and leaves arch specific ioctls alone.
>
> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity
> ---
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 01:10:49AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 11.05.2010, at 00:58, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
>
> > On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Roel Kluin wrote:
> >> An index of KVM44x_GUEST_TLB_SIZE is already one too large.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin
> >
> > Acked-by: H
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 02:53:54PM +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> (2010/05/11 12:43), Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 10:08:21PM +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> >>+How to Get
> >>+
> >>+Before calling this, you have to set the slot member of
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 10:07:02PM +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> We move dirty bitmaps to user space.
>
> - Allocation and destruction: we use do_mmap() and do_munmap().
>The new bitmap space is twice longer than the original one and we
>use the additional space for double buffering: t
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 10:08:21PM +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> Now that dirty bitmaps are accessible from user space, we export the
> addresses of these to achieve zero-copy dirty log check:
>
> KVM_GET_USER_DIRTY_LOG_ADDR
>
> We also need an API for triggering dirty bitmap switch to take
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 06:50:28PM +0800, Liu Yu wrote:
> These patches fix current e500 break.
>
> v2:
> patch 2: add comment about PIR
> patch 3: move tlbcfg code to init
Applied all (and updated 3/3), thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ppc" in
the body of
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 10:19:22PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> When we're loading bolted entries into the SLB again, we're checking if an
> entry is in use and only slbmte it when it is.
>
> Unfortunately, the check always goes to the skip label of the first entry,
> resulting in an endless loo
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 10:19:25PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> The PowerPC C ABI defines that registers r14-r31 need to be preserved across
> function calls. Since our exit handler is written in C, we can make use of
> that
> and don't need to reload r14-r31 on every entry/exit cycle.
>
> This
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 03:09:52AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Hi Marcelo,
>
> On 30.12.2009, at 16:40, Giuseppe Falsetti wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I get this error when compile the git tree virt/kvm/kvm.git next
> >
> > My machine is a Xserve G5 DUAL processor, Lenny with gcc-4.3.2
> >
> > HOSTC
-off-by: Alexander Graf
> Reported-by: Giuseppe Falsetti
> CC: Marcelo Tosatti
Yes, this is right. Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ppc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:41:54AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Jan spotted that we shouldn't use a function only available when CONFIG_COMPAT
> in a struct that's available without the config option.
>
> So since my patch introduces that, let's just not export the compat ioctl
> function when C
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 04:08:29PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann
>
> With big endian userspace, we can't quite figure out if a pointer
> is 32 bit (shifted >> 32) or 64 bit when we read a 64 bit pointer.
>
> This is what happens with dirty logging. To get the pointer interpr
93 matches
Mail list logo
