Re: [LARTC] a small htb question (I think)

2002-06-10 Thread Amit Kucheria
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Don Cohen wrote: > in the output of ip addr: > > 2: eth0: ... qdisc htb qlen 100 > > Does qlen 100 have anything to do with htb? No. It is the dev->tx_queue_len as set when the device is initialized (struct device/struct netdevice). -- I'm an angel!!! Honest! The horn

Re: [LARTC] equalize and DNS zone transfers

2002-06-10 Thread Paul English
> Off hand I would assume that your kernel was not compiled with > multipath support. That's the only reason I can think of off hand why > those commands would fail. On closer examination that appears to be true. I thought I had installed the kernel (same version) with multipath support,

[LARTC] a small htb question (I think)

2002-06-10 Thread Don Cohen
in the output of ip addr: 2: eth0: ... qdisc htb qlen 100 Does qlen 100 have anything to do with htb? ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[LARTC] GRED queues in Diffserv

2002-06-10 Thread Amit Kucheria
Hi all, I am setting up a Diffserv router. Part of the script that I use it as follows: --- sudo /usr/bin/tc qdisc add dev r1p4 handle 1:0 root dsmark indices 64 set_tc_index sudo /usr/bin/tc filter add dev r1p4 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 1 tc

Re: [LARTC] Ethloop again and 4 level tree ???

2002-06-10 Thread King Yung Tong
Hello Martin, Any comment for the graph in my web site? Pat On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, King Yung Tong wrote: > Thank you for your attention, my web page is on www.cs.dal.ca/~tong > 3 experiments were attached. > > Best Regards, > > Patrick Tong > > On Sun, 9 Jun 2002, King Yung Tong wrote: > > >

Re: [LARTC] Voip QOS

2002-06-10 Thread Michael T. Babcock
Stef Coene wrote: >What are the requirements for a good VOIP link? Steady bandwidth, low >latency, low jitter, ... > > All of the above, in my experience. Depending on the protocol, good bandwidth (as opposed to perfect) and very low latency are required. Bandwidth equal to the target

Re: [LARTC] Voip QOS

2002-06-10 Thread Stef Coene
On Monday 10 June 2002 21:50, Muhammed Soyer wrote: > Hi, > I have an 128K wan connection to one of my offices. We are using VOIP > on this connection ..We also carry our data traffic on this line ..Some > time , when the data traffic is high , the voice quality drops drastically > .. I have t

Re: [LARTC] Voip QOS

2002-06-10 Thread King Yung Tong
Hello, can you post your working script about the prio and VOIP. I am doing some prio script but it is not working. Pat On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Muhammed Soyer wrote: > Hi, > I have an 128K wan connection to one of my offices. We are using VOIP on this >connection ..We also carry our data traf

[LARTC] Voip QOS

2002-06-10 Thread Muhammed Soyer
Hi, I have an 128K wan connection to one of my offices. We are using VOIP on this connection ..We also carry our data traffic on this line ..Some time , when the data traffic is high , the voice quality drops drastically .. I have tried prio queues ..I let the voice traffic use the first ban

[LARTC] iptables: No chain/target/match by that name

2002-06-10 Thread Mr SERBAN Rares
Hi all, I installed linux kernel 2.4.18 and iptables 1.2.6a with patches htb3.3_tc.dif iptables-1.2.6a-imq.diff-3 sch_generic.diff I compiled everything without problems. When I tried to run some examples I received this message: ./iptables -t mangle -A prerouting -i eth3 -j IMQ iptables: No c

Re: [LARTC] Ethloop again and 4 level tree ???

2002-06-10 Thread King Yung Tong
Thank you for your attention, my web page is on www.cs.dal.ca/~tong 3 experiments were attached. Best Regards, Patrick Tong On Sun, 9 Jun 2002, King Yung Tong wrote: > Dear Martin, > > Hello again, Thank you for you help last time. > I think I understand the solution form you and Stef, but wh

[LARTC] U32 & 2.2.20

2002-06-10 Thread Michael T. Babcock
Is there a patch to make U32 filters work properly on 2.2.20?  I've had some problems using my U32 filters from 2.4.x on 2.2.x in general, but I haven't worked on it much.  I just figured if there was a quick solution, I'd take it :-). -- Michael