On Thu, 13 May 2004, 09:28:17PM +0200¨, Andreas Klauer said:
> Am Thursday 13 May 2004 19:38 schrieb Natxo Asenjo:
> > + tc qdisc add dev ppp0 root handle 1: htb default 30
> > RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
>
> Wrong tc.
yes, I thought so :)
> > HTB init, kernel part version 3.16
> > H
On Thursday 13 May 2004 13:28, Andreas Klauer wrote:
> Am Thursday 13 May 2004 16:38 schrieb Andreas Klauer:
> > Am Thursday 13 May 2004 15:54 schrieb Andy Furniss:
> > > I've just noticed that there is a patch on devik's site which does mpu
> > > and overhead.
> >
> > I'll give it a try. Thanks fo
Jason Boxman wrote:
I imagine you set $DEV to ethX, right? (In the original script it was ppp0.)
yep...
<>You'll need to patch your kernel to use either one and they both
have IPTables
components you will need to use to match traffic. IPP2P needs CONNMARK,
which is available in patch-o-mati
Hello,
On Thu, 13 May 2004, Robert Kurjata wrote:
> JA> To all: do you have some working script(s) that we can
> JA> recommend for setups with 2 or 3 uplinks in multipath route? Then we
> JA> can link them to the web page as reference.
> [cut]
> I've posted one in 2 links version. Now
On Thursday 13 May 2004 14:59, Lars Oeschey wrote:
> Andreas Klauer wrote:
> >The modified wondershaper is here:
> >http://www.metamorpher.de/files/wshaper-over-lan.htb
>
> I tested the script now, it works good so far in that LAN traffic isn't
> slowed down anymore . But when p2p has full Band
On Thursday 13 May 2004 06:34, calin popa wrote:
> Hi, my name is Calin and I'm new to linux, but I guess its the right place
> to ask this:
>
> what do I set on a linux RH9 box with 2.4.24 kernel to route a 10 machine
> private network (192.168.x.x) by 3 limited bandwidth, public IPs
> (193.231.
Am Thursday 13 May 2004 19:38 schrieb Natxo Asenjo:
> + tc qdisc add dev ppp0 root handle 1: htb default 30
> RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
Wrong tc.
> HTB init, kernel part version 3.16
> HTB: need tc/htb version 3 (minor is 16), you have 10
>
> And I do not know where I can get another ve
Am Thursday 13 May 2004 20:59 schrieb Lars Oeschey:
> Andreas Klauer wrote:
> >The modified wondershaper is here:
> >http://www.metamorpher.de/files/wshaper-over-lan.htb
>
> I would like that p2p just gets the bandwidth thats
> left over after http, is that possible?
It's hard to get the P2P s
Andreas Klauer wrote:
The modified wondershaper is here:
http://www.metamorpher.de/files/wshaper-over-lan.htb
I tested the script now, it works good so far in that LAN traffic isn't
slowed down anymore . But when p2p has full Bandwidth, http over the
proxy is very slow. I would like that p
hi there,
this is my 1st message in the list.
I would like to use this wondershaper.htb to limit the bandwith usage at
home.
My kernel config is:
# QoS and/or fair queueing
#
CONFIG_NET_SCHED=y
CONFIG_NET_SCH_CBQ=y
CONFIG_NET_SCH_HTB=y
CONFIG_NET_SCH_CSZ=y
CONFIG_NET_SCH_HFSC=y
CONFIG_NET_SCH
Patrick:
I tried that filter line, but it has incorrect syntax. But that isn't
the problem. The problem is the HFSC part... The traffic is indeed UDP
port 1234, and the HFSC qdisc functions for a short period of time
(between 5 and 60 seconds or so, and then stops passing any traffic on
the
On Thursday 13 May 2004 16:05, Carles Xavier Munyoz Baldó wrote:
> Hi,
> If I have a DSL router with 300kpbs upload bandwith:
> Linux(eth0) ---(100Mbps)---> DSL ---(300kbps)---> INTERNET
>
> Which is the recomended value I must set in my QoS setup for the maximum
> outbound bandwith of my ethernet
Am Thursday 13 May 2004 16:38 schrieb Andreas Klauer:
> Am Thursday 13 May 2004 15:54 schrieb Andy Furniss:
> > I've just noticed that there is a patch on devik's site which does mpu
> > and overhead.
>
> I'll give it a try. Thanks for the hint.
Well, patching was a little difficult... it didn't l
Am Thursday 13 May 2004 15:54 schrieb Andy Furniss:
> I've just noticed that there is a patch on devik's site which does mpu
> and overhead.
>
> http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/
Great, all the gems are hidden in the Changelog. ;-)
Direct link:
http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/v3/htb_tc_overh
Lawrence MacIntyre wrote:
Thanks, Patrick. That makes it a bit harder to manage from a remote
machine. I'll have to be very careful with that. I'll try to figure
out the implications of the default classification and send more email
if I can't get it.
So I reordered the commands and changed
Hi.
I wrote in a reply to a mail on here recently that you can't set mpu
(minimum packet unit) on HTB as you can on CBQ.
I've just noticed that there is a patch on devik's site which does mpu
and overhead.
http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/
For dsl users mpu is, for practical purposes going
Am Thursday 13 May 2004 15:48 schrieb Lars Oeschey:
> err, not really, it's just that http/mail etc. wins over p2p ;)
If you want to detect P2P traffic, have a look into this:
http://rnvs.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/ipp2p/index_en.html
My Fair NAT script supports it. It works well for me. :-)
HTH
Hi,
If I have a DSL router with 300kpbs upload bandwith:
Linux(eth0) ---(100Mbps)---> DSL ---(300kbps)---> INTERNET
Which is the recomended value I must set in my QoS setup for the maximum
outbound bandwith of my ethernet interface ?
The max of 300kbps or something less like 290kbps ?
Especify l
Thanks, Patrick. That makes it a bit harder to manage from a remote
machine. I'll have to be very careful with that. I'll try to figure
out the implications of the default classification and send more email
if I can't get it.
So I reordered the commands and changed them around. It looks lik
> Am Thursday 13 May 2004 09:06 schrieb Lars Oeschey:
> Read in the LARTC Howto (www.lartc.org) about it.
just did ;)
>> There's just me and my wife,
> You need shaping so badly if there are only two users?
err, not really, it's just that http/mail etc. wins over p2p ;)
> If you want every t
Lawrence MacIntyre wrote:
/usr/local/bin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: hfsc
/usr/local/bin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 hfsc ul m1
30mbit d 0 m2 30mbit ls m1 30mbit d 0 m2 30mbit
When the second command is executed, the machine simply drops all
packets going through it.
Un
Hi,
Anyone here knows if is there any TCP rate control C library ?
I have a server program to which users authenticate to access its services.
The problem is that some users takes lot of bandwidth, disturbing the
performance of the other connected users.
I have used QoS to advoid that a single u
Am Thursday 13 May 2004 09:06 schrieb Lars Oeschey:
> err, what's ingress?
Read in the LARTC Howto (www.lartc.org) about it.
Wondershaper does it for limiting incoming traffic.
The real classful shaping can only be done for outgoing traffic.
(Well, probably unless you're using IMQ, but Wondershap
raptor wrote:
tryng to access ftp servers from inside...
Well I am not sure - I would be double checking all scripts for
typos/brainos. You haven't posted evrything you use - and even if you
did I am no netfilter/firewalling expert. The netfilter list is probably
a better place for this sort of
Hi, my name is Calin and I'm new to linux, but I guess its the right place to ask
this:
what do I set on a linux RH9 box with 2.4.24 kernel to route a 10 machine private
network (192.168.x.x) by 3 limited bandwidth, public IPs (193.231.x.x). The network
uses a switch, the linux box has 1 ethe
Hello Julian,
Thursday, May 13, 2004, 9:23:27 AM, you wrote:
JA> Hello,
JA> To all: do you have some working script(s) that we can
JA> recommend for setups with 2 or 3 uplinks in multipath route? Then we
JA> can link them to the web page as reference.
[cut]
I've posted one in 2 links ve
Hello,
To all: do you have some working script(s) that we can
recommend for setups with 2 or 3 uplinks in multipath route? Then we
can link them to the web page as reference.
On Thu, 13 May 2004, Muhammad Reza wrote:
> now i downgrade to rh-7.2 (2.4.20-w/ julian patch)and iprout
> You have to add your filters then to the DSL class instead of
> parent qdisc, and a filter in the parent qdisc that puts packets
> that go to the Router IP into the DSL class. Or modify your filters
> so that they only apply to Router packets. Especially if you're
> using ingress, you have to
28 matches
Mail list logo
