Hello Victor,
Friday, June 11, 2004, 5:21:05 PM, you wrote:
VC> +---+
VC> |debian13 |
VC> |eth0:192.168.0.13 |
VC> +---+
VC> |eth0
VC> |
VC> |eth0
VC> +--+
VC> |firewall/router(linux-box)|
VC> |which con
On Saturday 12 June 2004 18:47, victor wrote:
> I have
> - HZ - recompiled to 1000
> - class nr 1 - 2kbit ceil 1024kbit
> - class nr 2 - 16kbit ceil1024kbit
> - prio 3 to all classes
>
> But class 1 works with 20kbit/sec and class 2 with 60kbit/sec.
> The proportion does not seems right.
This is
> 1. In order of priority, we satisfy all leaf classes' rates (while the class
> is ?green?)
> 2. When the leaf classes' rate is reached (all the leaf classes are ?yellow?),
> borrow the unused speed from parent classes if they have something to give
> (if they are not ?red?). In this case, each le
Hi,
I want to setup core routers to do both DSCP marking
and to get the DSCP and forward packets based on DS
field. I don't want to separate DSCP marking to be
done only at the edge routers.
I know that dsmark is both used for DSCP marking and
for getting the DSCP and forwarding packets according
A little bit of searching brings up this page:
http://www.docum.org/stef.coene/qos/faq/cache/31.html
I hope that helps,
Cliff
Yacine wrote:
Hi,
My system always complain with the warning below :
HTB: quantum of class 10099 is small. Consider r2q change.
...
Thanks,
Yacine.
Dmitry Golubev wrote:
One think I do not understand neither for SFQ nor for HTB (please explain for
both) - how can we maintain fairness in case of differently-sizes packets. As
I understand, one packet is atomic unit, and interface is requesting not more
and not less than one packet.
I don't
Hi,My
system always complain with the warning below :HTB: quantum of class 10099
is small. Consider r2q change.I simply do not understand
why...Below my tc commands :/sbin/tc qdisc del dev eth0
root/sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1 htb default 99/sbin/tc
class add dev eth0 parent 1:
Hi,
I have a default class for my un-marked traffic
(prio 5) and a prio 0 class for the important stuff,
but I do not understand why my download traffic
is duplicated in both.
It work fine for my upload traffic (same setting
except the red class but I have the same
result if I create an
Hello all, i have been having problem with my LAN. The
browsing speed went rapidly slow, expecialy
yahoo.com(its not even opening).
I new the problem wasnt from my ISP, because all other
Networks are browsing fast!
I did ifconfig on my Linux server, and discovered
there were some collisions on the
Hi.
I have Fedora core 1 (kernel 2.4.22) and I downloaded
http://developer.osdl.org/dev/iproute2/download/iproute2-2.6.7-ss040608.tar.gz
Before upgrading, tc -V shows "iproute2-ss020116", and after shows the
same.
I had a lot of errors during install (make and make install).
Is this lastest ver
10 matches
Mail list logo
