On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 03:36, John Zavgren wrote:
Is there a port of this code availble for testing purposes?
Wht software? What code? What Testing?
tc is already available. I'm using it.
--
Ow Mun Heng
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 on D600 1.4Ghz CPU kernel
2.6.7-2.jul1-interactive
Neuromancer
Hi folks,
I have three network cards on my Slackware box and
eth0 and eth1 are for two Internet connections.
They have imq0 and imq1. All traffic shaping works
fine.
Internal eth2 does no traffic shaping.
But recently I have put two OpenVPN tunnels (tun
devices) and bothwork via eth0.
So
On 13 October 2004 pm 12:53, Remus wrote:
Hi folks,
I have three network cards on my Slackware box and eth0 and eth1 are for
two Internet connections. They have imq0 and imq1. All traffic shaping
works fine.
Internal eth2 does no traffic shaping.
But recently I have put two OpenVPN tunnels
Hi everyone, and thanks for your help so far.
I have been playing around with tc and htb for a couple of weeks now, and
while I am nowhere near understanding everything here, I am beginning to
know more about packets than I ever wanted to know.
I have two university buildings with a 1mb
Hi everyone, and thanks for your help so far.
I have been playing around with tc and htb for a couple of weeks now, and
while I am nowhere near understanding everything here, I am beginning to
know more about packets than I ever wanted to know.
I have two university buildings with a 1mb
I'm a tc newbie, and I think I am close to being able to use it to
control one of the virtual web sites on our Gentoo Linux server. The
site has it's own IP address. I have a bit of a problem in that the
way I originally configured tc, the busy site grabbed all the
bandwidth, leaving none
Seems I sent an HTML message to the listserv by mistake. Sorry!
Mike
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Got some solutions myself.
LAG is caused by :
NETDEV WATCHDOG eth0 timeout
this is caused bacause of problems with rtl8139 network card in kernel 2.6.x
Solutions :
1.add in lilo.conf : append=noapic
2.turn apic off in bios
3.if u have 2 rtl8139 cards, then exchange one with some other card type
Switching back to older kernel won't do much.
I've had this problem much earlier when using two NICs of the same type.
I couldn't figure out why, but there ARE problems is many ways when
using two cards of the same type. I had problems with sharing, with
routing, etc. etc.
Best solution is to use
Hi Antonios.
Antonios Chalkiopoulos wrote:
As a necessety for my job is to real-time monitor the bytes, packets, packet
dropped etc of all the qdiscs working inside the kernel i've tried varius
methods:
1. Parse tc -s command output and update a round robin database and use
rrdtool to
On Wednesday 13 October 2004 17:34, Stephan M. Ott wrote:
Switching back to older kernel won't do much.
I've had this problem much earlier when using two NICs of the same type.
I couldn't figure out why, but there ARE problems is many ways when
using two cards of the same type. I had problems
On Tuesday 12 October 2004 09:32, Antonios Chalkiopoulos wrote:
As a necessety for my job is to real-time monitor the bytes, packets,
packet dropped etc of all the qdiscs working inside the kernel i've tried
varius methods:
1. Parse tc -s command output and update a round robin database and
Hariett Jones wrote:
Got some solutions myself.
LAG is caused by :
NETDEV WATCHDOG eth0 timeout
this is caused bacause of problems with rtl8139 network card in kernel
2.6.x
I had to unselect SMP in kernel config to get my rtl8139 + PCI modem to
work with 2.6.8.1
Andy.
Solutions :
1.add in
Zviad O. Giorgadze wrote:
Hello LARTC,
Internet connection - ADSL, interface nas0 (115kbit guarantied, up to 1mbit possible.
Depends on ISP load, impossible to guess).
Internal interface LAN, eth0.
Is it possible to successfully shape download traffic on eth0 using HTB?
Classes must have
We had no problems with smp on 2.6.8.3, and since this cpu supports
hyperthreading we enjoy a *big* power boost using smp. :)
Mike
Andy Furniss wrote:
Hariett Jones wrote:
Got some solutions myself.
LAG is caused by :
NETDEV WATCHDOG eth0 timeout
this is caused bacause of problems with rtl8139
Mike Slinn wrote:
We had no problems with smp on 2.6.8.3, and since this cpu supports
hyperthreading we enjoy a *big* power boost using smp. :)
I think it's this box(via p200) + rtl8139 that's the problem - it's
always been a bit flakey. I have the same card in a PII350 intel440bx
and it has
Mike Slinn wrote:
I'm a tc newbie, and I think I am close to being able to use it to
control one of the virtual web sites on our Gentoo Linux server. The
site has it's own IP address. I have a bit of a problem in that the way
I originally configured tc, the busy site grabbed all the
On Thu, 2004-10-14 at 02:10, Zviad O. Giorgadze wrote:
According to tc-htb man page, if we set PRIO parameter, then after
supplying the packets to satisfy the RATE of all classes, the HTB
first sends the available packets to LOWEST PRIO class and so on.
I think that's correct
In this case if
On Wed, 2004-13-10 at 18:12 -0400, Jason Boxman wrote:
I was playing with that as well, but of late it doesn't seem to be actively
developed. Someone else mentioned LQL[1], but it doesn't seem to have hooks
to let you grab qdisc stats yet.
[1] http://www.coverfire.com/lql/
LQL seems to
Zviad O. Giorgadze wrote:
Only if I lower the ceiling on leaf 1:30 does it show any results. If I
have the ceiling the same on both, there is no measureable result in
speed. The both seem to share the connection equally.
Am I missing the point, is it possible at all, or am I just too dum
20 matches
Mail list logo
