El Friday 24 February 2006 06:36, Andreas Klauer escribió:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 11:42:16PM -0300, Luciano Ruete wrote:
with vde_switch daemon listening in a tuntap device.
I suppose that htb is device independet, i hope it does not matter.
I don't have any experience with vde_switch and
Andreas Hasenack wrote:
(using htb)
I'm trying to learn tc filter and it seems the flowid parameter can only
point to leaf classes. Actually, it can point anywhere, but it doesn't
seem to work unless it points to a leaf class. Is this correct?
For example, I have this tree:
Andreas Hasenack wrote:
With the below script, whenever I ping 10.0.16.10 (which matches the
only filter I have), traffic still get's sent to the default 1:2 class
instead of 1:1 and I don't know why... Any hints?
(kernel 2.6.12, iproute2-2.6.15)
tc qdisc del dev eth0 root /dev/null 21
tc
Andreas Hasenack wrote:
Em Qui 23 Fev 2006 19:47, Andreas Klauer escreveu:
So, how do we reliably calculate the minimum value for
buffer/burst/maxburts?
Trial Error, not that I ever had much luck with TBF though...
From my experiments, the minimum seems to be either MTU plus a few bytes
Laimis wrote:
If in one time 3 IP adresses using internet. TC script:
DEV=eth0 # LAN
SERVER_IP=192.168.1.2 # eth0 ip address
tc qdisc add dev $DEV root handle 1: htb default 255
tc class add dev $DEV parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 384Kbit quantum
1500
tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid
Rasmus Melgaard wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to make a shaper / firewall to improve sharing of bandwidth on a
ADSL (3mbit down / ½ mbit up)
Since the ADSL is very asymmetric, down is unimportant, I make a ingress rate
limit shaper to ensure, all shaping is at the Shaper, and not on the Router
or
Calin Ilis wrote:
Hi all,
I have a problem with htb and wonder if anybody has encountered this.
On my LAN I have more than 1000 clients, and I am using htb to shape the
incoming trafic. The problem is that I am experiencing packet loss (about 4%)
in the qos server. The server is droping
Markus Schulz wrote:
Am Freitag, 10. Februar 2006 14:45 schrieb Markus Schulz:
tc -s -d class show dev ppp0
class htb 1:1 root rate 576000bit ceil 576000bit burst 30Kb/8 mpu 0b
overhead 0b cburst 1739b/8 mpu 0b overhead 14b level 7
Sent 1485575598 bytes 3140554 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0)
ok, i've understand now. Differenz comes from gross versus net data
rates due to overhead of ATM-SAR and pppoe-overhead. All statistic
values are netto values.
Yes - you can get patches to do egress overheads for dsl - if you know
your exact type and are prepared to rebuild kernel or the
richard lucassen wrote:
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 11:43:40 +0200
Vaidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With u32 you cannot negate, that's why it is lame...
And why doesn't this work? (I send all port 80 to 1.2.3.4 to class 14
/before/ I send the rest to classid 13):
$TC filter add dev ${DEV_IFB}
Greetings Sameer,
: I have a linux router connected to two separate internet
: connection from an ISP. There is a third interface ( ip -
: 192.168.1.1 ) in the router connected to the local network.
: Configured the routing tables and added the rules and everything
: seems to be working
11 matches
Mail list logo
