Sam LARTC wrote:
> FYI,
>
>i've just created a quick patch adding esfq (Enhanced Stochastic
> Fairness queueing discipline) for tcng (Traffic Control Next
> Generation).
> Patch is located at http://devel.dob.sk/tcng+esfq.
> Enjoy.
I put a link to your patch page on the ESFQ page. Next ti
Hello,
I'm trying to setup what I thought would be a fairly basic tiered
shaping system. I have a 6mbit (768kbps) link coming into my eth1
device, with my LAN IPs on the eth0 device. I want to limit outgoing
traffic so that certain IPs are limited to 400kbps, with 3 classes under
that 400k so
Mogens Kjaer написа:
I have a centos 4 i386 machine that works like a
router (iptables filter, NAT) with two NIC's.
One NIC is connected to my ISP (100 Mbit FTTH),
I get a DHCP assigned public IP that changes
"sometimes". Most incoming ports are blocked
by my ISP.
In order to get a fixed IP and
I have a centos 4 i386 machine that works like a
router (iptables filter, NAT) with two NIC's.
One NIC is connected to my ISP (100 Mbit FTTH),
I get a DHCP assigned public IP that changes
"sometimes". Most incoming ports are blocked
by my ISP.
In order to get a fixed IP and open ports, I
have to
I use tc-viewer . It does a great job.
http://snaj.ath.cx/tc-viewer/tc-viewer.html
On 5/16/07, Pablo Fernandes Yahoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
Is there someone here who knows what does it means?
The Sent part.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# tc -s qdisc show |grep -A 2 "qdisc sfq 140:
Hello everybody!
Some time ago I've decided that using the MARK property of the Linux IP
packet structure for the needs of traffic control is not very useful. So
I wrote an iptables patch called IPCLASSIFY. It is fully based on IPMARK
but it uses the PRIORITY field instead of MARK.
The relat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 16/05/2007 21:30:39:
> Hello,
>
> Is there someone here who knows what does it means?
>
> The Sent part.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# tc -s qdisc show |grep -A 2 "qdisc sfq 140: dev eth0"
> qdisc sfq 140: dev eth0 parent 1:140 limit 128p quantum 1514b perturb
10sec
> S