Re: [LARTC] HTB does not respect the prio parameter

2007-09-07 Thread Justin Schoeman
Is quantum not perhaps a bit high? Try setting it lower, and see what happens? -justin On 2007-08-29 08:06, Martin Björnsson wrote: Hi all, I'm experimenting with HTB and the prio parameter and it does not give me results I expect. I've created 4 HTB classes: 1:10 TCP ACKs

[LARTC] HTB does not respect the prio parameter

2007-08-29 Thread Martin Björnsson
Hi all, I'm experimenting with HTB and the prio parameter and it does not give me results I expect. I've created 4 HTB classes: 1:10 TCP ACKs (prio 0) 1:20 TCP traffic on dst port 10001 (prio 1) 1:30 TCP traffic on dst port 1 (prio 2) 1:40 Default

Re: [LARTC] HTB does not respect the prio parameter

2007-08-29 Thread bartekR
Martin Björnsson pisze: Hi all, I'm experimenting with HTB and the prio parameter and it does not give me results I expect. I've created 4 HTB classes: 1:10 TCP ACKs (prio 0) 1:20 TCP traffic on dst port 10001 (prio 1) 1:30 TCP traffic on dst port 1 (prio 2) 1:40

Re: [LARTC] HTB does not respect the prio parameter

2007-08-29 Thread Martin Björnsson
Yes, exactly. So my 1:20 class (prio 1) should get to send more than the 1:30 class. But it doesn't, they both get about the same throughput. Nobody else having problems with the prio parameter? Martin bartekR wrote: Martin Björnsson pisze: Hi all, I'm experimenting with HTB and the prio

Re: [LARTC] HTB does not respect the prio parameter

2007-08-29 Thread Nikolay Kichukov
Hello Martin, I used to have this kind of problem before. Not sure if I resolved it with the help of folks on this mailing list, but I never tested. What you can try is to remove the prio parameter from the classes and leave the prio only for the filters. Let us know if that helps. Cheers,