Re: [Lazarus] Watches/Local variables/Registers [Re: IDE UI consolidation (was: Re: lfm as pascal)]

2009-05-07 Thread Alexander Klenin
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 20:55, Martin Friebe wrote: They should be merged together in a single list with appropriate filtering capabilities. > > another thing with combining them, is that the amount of Locals keeps > changing (watches just display unavailable). > > This means th

Re: [Lazarus] Watches/Local variables/Registers [Re: IDE UI consolidation (was: Re: lfm as pascal)]

2009-05-07 Thread Martin Friebe
Alexander Klenin wrote: > On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 08:56, Martin Friebe wrote: > >> To heat the discussion up: >> From the wiki: >> >>> Watches/Local variables/Registers >>> All three are a lists of name/value pairs used at debug time. >>> >>> They should be merged together in a single

Re: [Lazarus] Watches/Local variables/Registers [Re: IDE UI consolidation (was: Re: lfm as pascal)]

2009-05-06 Thread Alexander Klenin
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 08:56, Martin Friebe wrote: > To heat the discussion up: >  From the wiki: >> >> >>     Watches/Local variables/Registers >> >> All three are a lists of name/value pairs used at debug time. >> >> They should be merged together in a single list with appropriate >> filtering c

[Lazarus] Watches/Local variables/Registers [Re: IDE UI consolidation (was: Re: lfm as pascal)]

2009-05-06 Thread Martin Friebe
To heat the discussion up: From the wiki: > > > Watches/Local variables/Registers > > All three are a lists of name/value pairs used at debug time. > > They should be merged together in a single list with appropriate > filtering capabilities. > That would make debugging so much harder. Let's