By the way, I'd recommend to upgrade freepascal repository to the recently
released svn 1.7
This will slightly lessen the pain for those who still can not move to git.
--
Alexander S. Klenin
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal
- Original Message -
> > > Git is cool.
> > Yes!
Purportedly a solution is in the works:
http://www.developer.com/open/subversion-1.7-released-with-some-git-esque-merging.html.
I have no opinion regarding "newmerge" (nor have I any basis for one) but I
administer some small gitolite r
2011/10/14 Gregory M. Turner
> > Git is cool.
>
> Yes!
>
> > I run "git revert" for the relevant revisions, then combined them and
> > committed to server.
> > Then I created a local branch and reverted again the earlier created
> > "revert-commit".
> > So I got my changes saved there, waiting un
On 14/10/2011 09:07, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
> Not that I fault anybody for using it -- I use it internally, in
> fact. But,... come now... one monolithic linear repository relying
> on a _convention_ of "branch" _directories_? Each repo hosted at a
> canonical url, which we need constant ac
> Sorry for the hassle.
No worries!
> Please test.
It works.
> P.S.
> Git is cool.
Yes!
> I run "git revert" for the relevant revisions, then combined them and
> committed to server.
> Then I created a local branch and reverted again the earlier created
> "revert-commit".
> So I got my change
Hi
I reverted the changes in r32874. Sorry for the hassle.
I will concentrate on the issue later.
Please test.
Regards,
Juha
P.S.
Git is cool.
I run "git revert" for the relevant revisions, then combined them and
committed to server.
Then I created a local branch and reverted again the earlier c
Am 13.10.2011 16:12, schrieb Gregory M. Turner:
Just one other small note about this. Although AFAIK Windows won't let you
delete a loaded PE file, it /will/ let you rename it. I don't even think you
need any special privileges to do it (don't quote me). (Don't test this using
explorer, it
- Original Message -
> - Original Message -
Just one other small note about this. Although AFAIK Windows won't let you
delete a loaded PE file, it /will/ let you rename it. I don't even think you
need any special privileges to do it (don't quote me). (Don't test this using
e
- Original Message -
>
> Index: buildlazdialog.pas
> ===
> --- buildlazdialog.pas(revision 32869)
> +++ buildlazdialog.pas(working copy)
> @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@
>Tool.Title:=lisIDE;
>Tool.Workin
- Original Message -
> 13.10.2011 11:06, Juha Manninen пишет:
> > Hi
> >
> > Please test with r32866.
> > You must do "make clean all" first and then build from the "Build
>
> Already tested. Still broken.
I have a bit more info on this.
In some sense, the problem seems to come down to
13.10.2011 11:06, Juha Manninen пишет:
Hi
Please test with r32866.
You must do "make clean all" first and then build from the "Build
Already tested. Still broken.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.
Hi
Please test with r32866.
You must do "make clean all" first and then build from the "Build Lazarus"
dialog.
There is also an associated bug report: 20476: Cannot compile Lazarus
Regards,
Juha
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.fre
12.10.2011 17:27, Gregory M. Turner пишет:
I am despairing after two days of trying to get svn to build itself on win32
(under wow64) with the fixes_2_6 branch of fpc.
Is this, by any chance, in some
known-not-working-for-now-while-somebody-hacks-on-something state?
I have problems too.
rev
> 2011/10/12 Gregory M. Turner < g...@malth.us >
> > Ah, fantastic, thanks. Only problem is when I do that all my design
> > packages stay as "install next time" or whatever it's called,
> > forever. But don't worry about that. I'll solve this problem the
> > old-fashioned way -- by playing video
2011/10/12 Gregory M. Turner
> Ah, fantastic, thanks. Only problem is when I do that all my design
> packages stay as "install next time" or whatever it's called, forever. But
> don't worry about that. I'll solve this problem the old-fashioned way -- by
> playing video games until somebody els
- "Gregory M. Turner" schreef:
>
> Ah, fantastic, thanks. Only problem is when I do that all my design packages
> stay as "install next time" or whatever it's called, forever. But don't worry
> about that. I'll solve this problem the old-fashioned way -- by playing video
> games until so
On 12.10.2011 21:34, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
Out of pure intellectual curiosity -- what is the story behind the
monolithic build? Surely fpc doesn't lack (anymore?) the requisite
.dll/ld.so features to accomodate a .bpl-style approach?
While libraries mostly do work there is the whole infrastr
2011/10/12 Gregory M. Turner
> Ah, fantastic, thanks. Only problem is when I do that all my design
> packages stay as "install next time" or whatever it's called, forever. But
> don't worry about that. I'll solve this problem the old-fashioned way -- by
> playing video games until somebody els
Ah, fantastic, thanks. Only problem is when I do that all my design packages
stay as "install next time" or whatever it's called, forever. But don't worry
about that. I'll solve this problem the old-fashioned way -- by playing video
games until somebody else fixes it for me :)
Out of pure inte
It was bone dry to start, I literally deleted c:\Lazarus and checked out trunk
from svn. Although it's been through quite a bit of thrashing since then, I'm
reluctant to blow it away. I have a 99.5% working cygwin-based *.chm build
environment set up in there, for one thing. I'll rm -rf at so
2011/10/12 Gregory M. Turner
> I am despairing after two days of trying to get svn to build itself on
> win32 (under wow64) with the fixes_2_6 branch of fpc.
>
> Is this, by any chance, in some
> known-not-working-for-now-while-somebody-hacks-on-something state?
>
Yes, I think I am the one to bl
Am 12.10.2011 15:27, schrieb Gregory M. Turner:
C:/lazarus/fpc/2.6/bin/i386-win32/fpc.exe -gl -dlclwin32
-Fu../lcl/units/i386-win32 -Fu../lcl/units/i386-win32/win32
-Fu../components/codetools/units/i386-win32
-Fu../components/lazutils/lib/i386-win32
-Fu../components/synedit/units/i386-win32
I am despairing after two days of trying to get svn to build itself on win32
(under wow64) with the fixes_2_6 branch of fpc.
Is this, by any chance, in some
known-not-working-for-now-while-somebody-hacks-on-something state?
What always happens -- well, almost always; I have vague memories of it
23 matches
Mail list logo
