Re: [Leaf-devel] cryptographically signed .LRPs

2001-12-11 Thread Scott C. Best
Thought I'd contribute my brief understanding of package signing using openssl. I believe this package can be customized on install so that it only provides the tools you need. Package signing only needs (I believe) 4: md5, rsautl, genrsa, and rsa. First, you need the md5 hash of

Re: [Leaf-devel] cryptographically signed .LRPs

2001-12-11 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
> And Jack Coats pointed out gpgv that might fit on a CD (283932 bytes), > to which Jeff Newmiller reminded all that gpg will take that much > ramdisk + RAM to run in... > > gpgv is the verification only part, and looking through the source code, > most of it is gpg "stubbed out" (to be as small a

[Leaf-devel] cryptographically signed .LRPs

2001-12-11 Thread Angelacos, Nathan
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > Yeah, I think it's pretty big, plus I believe most of these packages require > openssl and other huge add-ons to run. The basics of public-key > cryptography, however, are pretty simple, so I think it'd be possible to > make a small (a few K, pe