On Thursday, January 21, 2021 at 5:29:51 PM UTC-5 jkn wrote:
> On Thursday, January 21, 2021 at 5:41:58 PM UTC tbp1...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> It works for me :) That is, the text of all the child nodes of the @rst
>> node gets included in the single rst file that *rst3* outputs and the
>>
On Thursday, January 21, 2021 at 5:41:58 PM UTC tbp1...@gmail.com wrote:
> It works for me :) That is, the text of all the child nodes of the @rst
> node gets included in the single rst file that *rst3* outputs and the
> node headlines become subtitles.
>
It depends what you mean by the
On Thursday, January 21, 2021 at 12:41:58 PM UTC-5 tbp1...@gmail.com wrote:
> ... The script looks like this:
>
> import os
>
> cmd = ('py -m sphinx -C '
> '-D master_doc=xxx-rst '
> '-D source_suffix=.txt '
> '-D html_theme=sphinx_rtd_theme ' # Omit for a default theme
> '-D "project=RST
It works for me :) That is, the text of all the child nodes of the @rst
node gets included in the single rst file that *rst3* outputs and the node
headlines become subtitles. However, you don't have to use a path
expression, even if it is in an @path node. You can use an ordinary path
for
> If @rst is including the entire path in the file name, you can put the
@rst node under an @path node.
Hmm, I tried that - the file gets written with the correct pathname
(location and filename) when the rst3 command is run - but the output is
incorrect. No child nodes seem to be being used.
On Thursday, January 21, 2021 at 2:38:25 PM UTC tbp1...@gmail.com wrote:
> For an @rst node, the *rst3* command adds a *.txt* extension to every
> filename. Maybe there is a setting to change this, I don't know.
Yes, I saw that - I wasn't wild about it but I can live with that for now.
For an @rst node, the *rst3* command adds a *.txt* extension to every
filename. Maybe there is a setting to change this, I don't know. Sphinx is
happy working with **.txt* files, as long as you tell it to in the Sphinx
configuration. If @rst is including the entire path in the file name,
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 7:16 AM jkn wrote:
>
> Hi Edward
> I am looking at switching from occasionally creating documents via
> AsciiDoc, to via ReStructuredText instead (my new company uses ResT, sphinx
> etc, which is nice).
>
> I am used to using 'path expressions' in the headline for an
Hi Edward
I am looking at switching from occasionally creating documents via
AsciiDoc, to via ReStructuredText instead (my new company uses ResT, sphinx
etc, which is nice).
I am used to using 'path expressions' in the headline for an @adoc file:
@adoc
