- Mail original -
> De: "Bruce Dubbs"
> À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
> Envoyé: Mercredi 15 Mai 2013 20:16:58
> Objet: Re: [lfs-dev] util-linux issues
>
> Gilles Espinasse wrote:
> >
> >
> > - Mail original -
>
Gilles Espinasse wrote:
>
>
> - Mail original -
>> De: "Bruce Dubbs"
>> À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
>> Envoyé: Mardi 14 Mai 2013 20:59:08
>> Objet: [lfs-dev] util-linux issues
>>
>> 1. The latest git commit in util-
- Mail original -
> De: "Bruce Dubbs"
> À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
> Envoyé: Mardi 14 Mai 2013 20:59:08
> Objet: [lfs-dev] util-linux issues
>
> 1. The latest git commit in util-linux now has a fix for umount not
> remounting the root f
On 05/14/2013 01:59:08 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> 2. Also, I did a test of setting /etc/mtab as a symlink to
> /proc/mounts
> and it seems to work properly although the output of 'mount' is a bit
> more verbose. My objection of 'mount' not specifying the device for
> the
> rootfs is fixed. I th
xinglp wrote:
> Since we use symlink now, /etc/init.d/mountfs need to be changed.
>
> These should be deleted.
> - log_info_msg "Recording existing mounts in /etc/mtab..."
> - > /etc/mtab
> -
> - mount -f / || failed=1
> - mount -f /proc || failed=1
> - mount -f /sys
2013/5/15 Matt Burgess :
> On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 13:59 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> 1. The latest git commit in util-linux now has a fix for umount not
>> remounting the root fs read only with a 'umount -a -r' command.
>>
>> I'm not sure if we should fix that in LFS or just wait until the next
>> r
On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 13:59 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> 1. The latest git commit in util-linux now has a fix for umount not
> remounting the root fs read only with a 'umount -a -r' command.
>
> I'm not sure if we should fix that in LFS or just wait until the next
> release of util-linux. We do
1. The latest git commit in util-linux now has a fix for umount not
remounting the root fs read only with a 'umount -a -r' command.
I'm not sure if we should fix that in LFS or just wait until the next
release of util-linux. We do have a workaround in place in the mountfs
script, and it's a pr
