Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 3/14/07, Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthew Burgess wrote:
How about:
The commandldd/command shell script contains Bash-specific syntax.
Change its shebang line to force the script to be interpreted by Bash in
case
other shells (see link
On 3/23/07, Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going ahead with this now with my preferred default program
interpreter. Anyone can feel free to change this that doesn't work
for them.
What's a program interpreter?
I'd prefer default shell.
When you set the shebang line, you're
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 03/23/07 19:01 CST:
What's a program interpreter?
I'd prefer default shell.
Hopefully, Bruce is just joking. :-) I've been using the term since back
in the days I was using a Tandy color computer with a 'basic' program
interpreter cartridge plugged in.
The
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 03/23/07 19:01 CST:
What's a program interpreter?
I'd prefer default shell.
Hopefully, Bruce is just joking. :-) I've been using the term since back
in the days I was using a Tandy color computer with a 'basic' program
interpreter
On Wednesday 14 March 2007 04:49, Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 3/13/07, Matthew Burgess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 12 March 2007 19:44, Dan Nicholson wrote:
So, I'm proposing that we force
/bin/bash as the shebang for ldd. Two possible ways are:
1. Prior to configure and changing
On 3/13/07, Ag. Hatzimanikas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, at 09:49 Dan Nicholson wrote:
Suggestions on the explanation welcomed for this patch.
As you miiight :) have noticed by now, I am not an expert in English language
but ...
inadvertantly shouldn't be inadvertently ?
I
Matthew Burgess wrote:
How about:
The commandldd/command shell script contains Bash-specific syntax.
Change its shebang line to force the script to be interpreted by Bash in case
other shells (see link href=whateverBLFS/link) are installed and linked
to filename
On 3/14/07, Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthew Burgess wrote:
How about:
The commandldd/command shell script contains Bash-specific syntax.
Change its shebang line to force the script to be interpreted by Bash in
case
other shells (see link href=whateverBLFS/link) are
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 03/14/07 11:26 CST:
Change its invocation (shebang) line to ...
Another suggestion: Change its program interpreter (shebang) line to ...
--
Randy
rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.28] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version
On Wednesday 14 March 2007 16:45, Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 3/14/07, Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthew Burgess wrote:
How about:
The commandldd/command shell script contains Bash-specific syntax.
Change its shebang line to force the script to be interpreted by Bash
in
On Monday 12 March 2007 19:44, Dan Nicholson wrote:
So, I'm proposing that we force
/bin/bash as the shebang for ldd. Two possible ways are:
1. Prior to configure and changing dirs - sed -i 's|@BASH@|/bin/bash|'
elf/ldd.in
I like this option too. It's easy to explain exactly what that
On 3/13/07, Matthew Burgess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 12 March 2007 19:44, Dan Nicholson wrote:
So, I'm proposing that we force
/bin/bash as the shebang for ldd. Two possible ways are:
1. Prior to configure and changing dirs - sed -i 's|@BASH@|/bin/bash|'
elf/ldd.in
I like this
Following along with the POSIXification of 2007, I noticed that ldd is
a bash script and will fail silently for non-bash /bin/sh.
[12:25 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] bash /usr/bin/ldd /lib/libc.so.6
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7f2b000)
linux-gate.so.1 = (0xb7f2a000)
[12:25 PM [EMAIL
Dan Nicholson wrote:
I noticed that ldd is
a bash script and will fail silently for non-bash /bin/sh.
And I briefly thought well, could we patch ldd to make it POSIX?
Then I saw the script itself. Never mind. ;-)
So, I'm proposing that we force
/bin/bash as the shebang for ldd. Two
On 3/12/07, Bryan Kadzban [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Nicholson wrote:
I noticed that ldd is
a bash script and will fail silently for non-bash /bin/sh.
And I briefly thought well, could we patch ldd to make it POSIX?
Then I saw the script itself. Never mind. ;-)
Yeah, it's pretty
15 matches
Mail list logo