Re: Glibc ldd needs /bin/bash

2007-03-23 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Dan Nicholson wrote: On 3/14/07, Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Matthew Burgess wrote: How about: The commandldd/command shell script contains Bash-specific syntax. Change its shebang line to force the script to be interpreted by Bash in case other shells (see link

Re: Glibc ldd needs /bin/bash

2007-03-23 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 3/23/07, Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm going ahead with this now with my preferred default program interpreter. Anyone can feel free to change this that doesn't work for them. What's a program interpreter? I'd prefer default shell. When you set the shebang line, you're

Re: Glibc ldd needs /bin/bash

2007-03-23 Thread Randy McMurchy
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 03/23/07 19:01 CST: What's a program interpreter? I'd prefer default shell. Hopefully, Bruce is just joking. :-) I've been using the term since back in the days I was using a Tandy color computer with a 'basic' program interpreter cartridge plugged in. The

Re: Glibc ldd needs /bin/bash

2007-03-23 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Randy McMurchy wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 03/23/07 19:01 CST: What's a program interpreter? I'd prefer default shell. Hopefully, Bruce is just joking. :-) I've been using the term since back in the days I was using a Tandy color computer with a 'basic' program interpreter

Re: Glibc ldd needs /bin/bash

2007-03-14 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Wednesday 14 March 2007 04:49, Dan Nicholson wrote: On 3/13/07, Matthew Burgess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 12 March 2007 19:44, Dan Nicholson wrote: So, I'm proposing that we force /bin/bash as the shebang for ldd. Two possible ways are: 1. Prior to configure and changing

Re: Glibc ldd needs /bin/bash

2007-03-14 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 3/13/07, Ag. Hatzimanikas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, at 09:49 Dan Nicholson wrote: Suggestions on the explanation welcomed for this patch. As you miiight :) have noticed by now, I am not an expert in English language but ... inadvertantly shouldn't be inadvertently ? I

Re: Glibc ldd needs /bin/bash

2007-03-14 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Matthew Burgess wrote: How about: The commandldd/command shell script contains Bash-specific syntax. Change its shebang line to force the script to be interpreted by Bash in case other shells (see link href=whateverBLFS/link) are installed and linked to filename

Re: Glibc ldd needs /bin/bash

2007-03-14 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 3/14/07, Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Matthew Burgess wrote: How about: The commandldd/command shell script contains Bash-specific syntax. Change its shebang line to force the script to be interpreted by Bash in case other shells (see link href=whateverBLFS/link) are

Re: Glibc ldd needs /bin/bash

2007-03-14 Thread Randy McMurchy
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 03/14/07 11:26 CST: Change its invocation (shebang) line to ... Another suggestion: Change its program interpreter (shebang) line to ... -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.28] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version

Re: Glibc ldd needs /bin/bash

2007-03-14 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Wednesday 14 March 2007 16:45, Dan Nicholson wrote: On 3/14/07, Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Matthew Burgess wrote: How about: The commandldd/command shell script contains Bash-specific syntax. Change its shebang line to force the script to be interpreted by Bash in

Re: Glibc ldd needs /bin/bash

2007-03-13 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Monday 12 March 2007 19:44, Dan Nicholson wrote: So, I'm proposing that we force /bin/bash as the shebang for ldd. Two possible ways are: 1. Prior to configure and changing dirs - sed -i 's|@BASH@|/bin/bash|' elf/ldd.in I like this option too. It's easy to explain exactly what that

Re: Glibc ldd needs /bin/bash

2007-03-13 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 3/13/07, Matthew Burgess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 12 March 2007 19:44, Dan Nicholson wrote: So, I'm proposing that we force /bin/bash as the shebang for ldd. Two possible ways are: 1. Prior to configure and changing dirs - sed -i 's|@BASH@|/bin/bash|' elf/ldd.in I like this

Glibc ldd needs /bin/bash

2007-03-12 Thread Dan Nicholson
Following along with the POSIXification of 2007, I noticed that ldd is a bash script and will fail silently for non-bash /bin/sh. [12:25 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] bash /usr/bin/ldd /lib/libc.so.6 /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7f2b000) linux-gate.so.1 = (0xb7f2a000) [12:25 PM [EMAIL

Re: Glibc ldd needs /bin/bash

2007-03-12 Thread Bryan Kadzban
Dan Nicholson wrote: I noticed that ldd is a bash script and will fail silently for non-bash /bin/sh. And I briefly thought well, could we patch ldd to make it POSIX? Then I saw the script itself. Never mind. ;-) So, I'm proposing that we force /bin/bash as the shebang for ldd. Two

Re: Glibc ldd needs /bin/bash

2007-03-12 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 3/12/07, Bryan Kadzban [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dan Nicholson wrote: I noticed that ldd is a bash script and will fail silently for non-bash /bin/sh. And I briefly thought well, could we patch ldd to make it POSIX? Then I saw the script itself. Never mind. ;-) Yeah, it's pretty