On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 03:09:13PM +0100, Kaleb van Ingen Schenau wrote:
> Still no luck, i've made a 100% sure i start with a fresh copy of the
> extracted gcc.4.7.1.tar.bzp2 and i use a fresh gcc-build directory.
>
> I can give you a summary of my actions if that helps.
> 1. untar binutils, run
Still no luck, i've made a 100% sure i start with a fresh copy of the
extracted gcc.4.7.1.tar.bzp2 and i use a fresh gcc-build directory.
I can give you a summary of my actions if that helps.
1. untar binutils, run the test, apply patch
2. make a binutils-build directory
3. prepare the compile (co
make install was run and no errors what so ever, what i'll do is go back to
my snapshot i made after 6.10, i tried this before but im gonna go ahead
and do it again just to see if i dont have my old gcc-build folder hanging
around.
Ill let you know if i encounter the same problem again after the 3r
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 07:08:26PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> > I've no idea about virtual machines, maybe someone else can offer
> > suggestions about specific changes (if any) needed - but I don't
> > recall seeing problems from them apart from selecting the right
> > ke
Ken Moffat wrote:
> I've no idea about virtual machines, maybe someone else can offer
> suggestions about specific changes (if any) needed - but I don't
> recall seeing problems from them apart from selecting the right
> kernel options.
Ken,
I've built LFS several times in different virtual
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:42:03AM +0100, Kaleb van Ingen Schenau wrote:
> Hi, and thanks for the respond
>
> Throughout the book i've encountered 0 problems or errors and everything
> goes according to the book. It just seems weird that everything works as
> intended at chapter 6.10 then somewher
Hi, and thanks for the respond
Throughout the book i've encountered 0 problems or errors and everything
goes according to the book. It just seems weird that everything works as
intended at chapter 6.10 then somewhere between that and compiling
bin-utils and GCC it messes up somewhere, could this b
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 09:01:42AM +0100, Kaleb van Ingen Schenau wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm having a bit of a problem which is stopping me from continueing with
> LFS, after chapter 6.10 "Adjusting the Toolchain" i run the sanity check
> and all results come out as they are supposed to be according
Hey guys,
Note that we've switched topic in thread, hate to be rude like this but i'm
just making sure that the original help-request is still open and waiting
for a guardian angel to share his/her mighty wisdom and help me work out
why I'm stuck,
Kind regards,
Kaleb.
Link to topic :
http://linu
On Nov 14, 2012, at 2:31 AM, Paige Thompson wrote:
what do I do when I get to this part and it just keeps telling me no
such file or directory no such file or directory no such file or
directory:
chroot "$LFS" /tools/bin/env -i \
HOME=/root TERM="$TERM" PS1='\u:\w\$ ' \
PATH=/bin:/u
what do I do when I get to this part and it just keeps telling me no such file
or directory no such file or directory no such file or directory:
chroot "$LFS" /tools/bin/env -i \
HOME=/root TERM="$TERM" PS1='\u:\w\$ ' \
PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/tools/bin \
/tools/bin/bash -
I found a quick fix for my problem,
dev@dev-VirtualBox /mnt/erraticOS/tools/x86_64-linux-gnu/bin $ ls
a.out ar as gcc ld ld.bfd nm objcopy objdump ranlib strip
I moved ld and as to .old and created symlinks to the host's ld and as and the
make -C ld LIB_PATH=/usr/lib:/lib finished and
hahahahah, thats funny, right as this email arrived I was trying to figure out
the following (pass 2 of binutils):
dev@dev-VirtualBox /mnt/erraticOS/usr/src/binutils-build $ make -C ld
LIB_PATH=/usr/lib:/lib
make: Entering directory `/src/binutils-build/ld'make all-recursivemake[1]:
Entering
13 matches
Mail list logo