On 04/28/2011 05:10 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
This patch allows users to be notified about track switch on a continuous
audio stream. The A-V statusbar mess up a bit the printing sometimes, I
don't know how I should handle that. Also,
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 3:09 AM, rukhsana afroz wrote:
Just have pushed one clean repository.
--
Rukhsana Ruby
Phd Student
Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering
The University of British Columbia
___
libav-devel m
On 04/28/2011 06:41 PM, Kirill Gavrilov wrote:
2011/4/28 Alex Converse mailto:alex.conve...@gmail.com>>
This code already won't compile in a C++ compiler because of the way
it uses malloc().
I know a lot of things why LibAV sources couldn't be compiled with C++
compiler
however I intere
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Dennis Munsie wrote:
> I might be missing something, but it doesn't appear that the PTS field in
> AVPacket is preserved when decoding an h.264 frame. The AVFrame that gets
> returned has PTS set to AV_NOPTS_VALUE. Is this the desired behavior? If I
> pu
On 04/28/2011 02:00 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> And meanwhile startup overhead will be twice the already insane amount.
I'm afraid fixing the issue could require few weekends with at least 3-4
people banging their heads on the code to understand what the code tries
to do, write a clean replacement
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 01:24:56PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>>
>> I prefer to always s-o-b patches.
>>
>> Think of this scenario; a person sends a patch, it is modified by
>> somebody else, and then applied. Did the original author agre
On 04/23/2011 04:32 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> From: Ronald S. Bultje
>
> Tested on a Mac Pro, 2 CPUs, 2 cores each, OSX 10.6.6:
>
> time ./ffmpeg -v 0 -vsync 0 -threads [1234] -i \
> ~/Downloads/sintel_trailer_1080p_vp8_vorbis.webm \
> -f null -vcodec rawvideo -an -
> 1: 0m14.630s (89.9
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Justin Ruggles
>> wrote:
>>> The EMU_EDGE part looks correct. We should go ahead and commit that.
>>
>> Did you confirm that it does not i
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Luca Barbato wrote:
> On 4/28/11 9:41 AM, Martin Storsjö wrote:
> > These should be removed at some point, but they aren't removed yet.
> > The intent is to be able to recompile an old application against
> > the new ABI without modifying the code, and this doesn't work
> > cu
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Justin Ruggles
> wrote:
>> The EMU_EDGE part looks correct. We should go ahead and commit that.
>
> Did you confirm that it does not introduce valgrind errors when
> running ffmpeg -flags emu_edge -i
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> From: Baptiste Coudurier
>
> Ported-by: Alex Converse
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/libavcodec/s302m.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,141 @@
> +/*
> + * SMPTE 302M decoder
> + * Copyright (c) 2008 Laurent Aimar
> + * Copyright (c) 2009 Baptiste Coudurier
> + *
On Apr 28, 2011, at 1:35 PM, Dennis Munsie wrote:
> Hi everyone --
>
> I might be missing something, but it doesn't appear that the PTS field in
> AVPacket is preserved when decoding an h.264 frame. The AVFrame that gets
> returned has PTS set to AV_NOPTS_VALUE. Is this the desired behavior?
Hi.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Justin Ruggles
wrote:
> The EMU_EDGE part looks correct. We should go ahead and commit that.
Did you confirm that it does not introduce valgrind errors when
running ffmpeg -flags emu_edge -i file.amv -f null -?
Ronald
___
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 02:36:45PM -0400, Justin Ruggles wrote:
> On 04/28/2011 01:20 PM, Aℓex Converse wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:32 AM, Reinhard Tartler
> > wrote:
> >> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 03:37:27PM -0400, Justin Ruggles wrote:
> >>> On 04/27/2011 03:25 PM, Reinhard Tartler wr
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 14:18:56 (CEST), Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 08:28:19AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> ---
>> configure |2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> IIUC you can remove $LIBM from libswscale as well, since that one would
> pick u
On 04/28/2011 01:20 PM, Aℓex Converse wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:32 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 03:37:27PM -0400, Justin Ruggles wrote:
>>> On 04/27/2011 03:25 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>>>
From: Michael Niedermayer
Reported-at: Thu, 21 Apr 201
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Justin Ruggles
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 04/28/2011 02:08 PM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
>
>> + if (*data_size < 4 * buf_size * 8 / (avctx->bits_per_coded_sample + 4))
>> + return -1;
>
>
> I think this can cause invalid writes if buf_size > INT_MAX/32
Can't happen
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> ---
> libavcodec/vorbisdec.c | 41 -
> 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
Looks good to me.
Perhaps the patch subject should be changed to end in =sizeof(*variable)
instead, too, but no need t
Hi,
On 04/28/2011 02:08 PM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> +if (*data_size < 4 * buf_size * 8 / (avctx->bits_per_coded_sample + 4))
> +return -1;
I think this can cause invalid writes if buf_size > INT_MAX/32
-Justin
___
libav-devel mailing list
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
>
> From: Baptiste Coudurier
>
> Ported-by: Alex Converse
> ---
>
> This includes all review comments so far, plus a documentation entry
> and random prettyprinting.
>
> Changelog | 2 +
> doc/general.texi | 1 +
>
From: Baptiste Coudurier
Ported-by: Alex Converse
---
This includes all review comments so far, plus a documentation entry
and random prettyprinting.
Changelog |2 +
doc/general.texi |1 +
libavcodec/Makefile|1 +
libavcodec/allcodecs.c |1 +
libavcodec/
2011/4/28 Aℓex Converse :
> 2011/4/28 Aℓex Converse :
>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Justin Ruggles
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 04/27/2011 08:19 PM, Aℓex Converse wrote:
>>>
+ frame_size = (h >> 16) & 0x;
+ channels = 2 + 2*((h >> 14) & 0x03);
+ id = (h >> 6) & 0x
Hi everyone --
I might be missing something, but it doesn't appear that the PTS field in
AVPacket is preserved when decoding an h.264 frame. The AVFrame that gets
returned has PTS set to AV_NOPTS_VALUE. Is this the desired behavior? If I
put together a patch that preserved the PTS field, wou
From: Baptiste Coudurier
Ported-by: Alex Converse
---
Changelog |2 +
doc/general.texi |1 +
libavcodec/Makefile|1 +
libavcodec/allcodecs.c |1 +
libavcodec/avcodec.h |1 +
libavcodec/s302m.c | 141 ++
2011/4/28 Aℓex Converse :
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Justin Ruggles
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 04/27/2011 08:19 PM, Aℓex Converse wrote:
>>
>>> + frame_size = (h >> 16) & 0x;
>>> + channels = 2 + 2*((h >> 14) & 0x03);
>>> + id = (h >> 6) & 0xff;
>>> + bits = 16 + 4*((h >> 4)
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:32 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 03:37:27PM -0400, Justin Ruggles wrote:
>> On 04/27/2011 03:25 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>>
>> > From: Michael Niedermayer
>> >
>> > Reported-at: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 14:38:25 +
>> > Reported-by: Dominic Chell
>
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Justin Ruggles
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 04/27/2011 08:19 PM, Aℓex Converse wrote:
>
>> + frame_size = (h >> 16) & 0x;
>> + channels = 2 + 2*((h >> 14) & 0x03);
>> + id = (h >> 6) & 0xff;
>> + bits = 16 + 4*((h >> 4) & 0x03);
>
>
> This would be easier to
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> ---
> libavfilter/vf_fieldorder.c | 8
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
OK.
Ronald
___
libav-devel mailing list
libav-devel@libav.org
https://lists.libav.org/ma
---
libavfilter/vf_fieldorder.c |8
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavfilter/vf_fieldorder.c b/libavfilter/vf_fieldorder.c
index 59ca778..b55640b 100644
--- a/libavfilter/vf_fieldorder.c
+++ b/libavfilter/vf_fieldorder.c
@@ -1,20 +1,20 @@
/*
* Copy
2011/4/28 Alex Converse
> This code already won't compile in a C++ compiler because of the way
> it uses malloc().
>
I know a lot of things why LibAV sources couldn't be compiled with C++
compiler
however I interested what did you mean by malloc() usage? Usage without
explicit typecast?
Diego Bi
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 08:11:37AM -0700, Alex Converse wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
>> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 07:48:46AM -0700, Alex Converse wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 1:32 AM, Diego Biurrun
On 04/28/2011 02:35 PM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> Sure. The best way to notice the issue is changing the modified line in
> the patch with av_dump_format(s, 0, s->filename, 0) and you'll notice that
> kind of stuff after a few track switches (if it's a continuous bitstream):
>
> Stream #0.1: Inva
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 08:11:37AM -0700, Alex Converse wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 07:48:46AM -0700, Alex Converse wrote:
> >> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 1:32 AM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 05:19:25PM -0700, Aℓe
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 03:10:03PM +, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> > This patch allows users to be notified about track switch on a continuous
> > audio stream. The A-V statusbar mess up a bit the printing sometimes, I
> > don't kno
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Mike Scheutzow <
mike.scheut...@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
> This problem was more difficult to solve than I expected. I've attached a
> patch which takes a different approach than Tony's patch.
>
> One of the causes of this bug is that the h264 parser defaults lo
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Kirill Gavrilov wrote:
> Just notice. I don't think that usage of "class_" name is stupid.
> "class" is a keyword in C++ and you can not use it as a name for variables.
> However while this name appear in source file (.c, not a header, because
> appearing in header
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Alex Converse wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 3:21 AM, Felipe Contreras
> wrote:
>> 2011/4/28 Aℓex Converse :
>>
>> Why don't you use 'git send-email'? Or at least put the patches line.
>>
>
> Because I can't retrieve the patches on the computer I commit from if
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 3:21 AM, Felipe Contreras
wrote:
> 2011/4/28 Aℓex Converse :
>
> Why don't you use 'git send-email'? Or at least put the patches line.
>
Because I can't retrieve the patches on the computer I commit from if I do that.
___
libav-d
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 5:04 AM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Aℓex Converse writes:
>
>> There is most likely a performance hit here but the current code is
>> *undefined.*
>>
>> Haters are welcome to send suggestions on how to do this without an if.
>>
>> From 554be95192ad9803f51f00fec18bf6db9a562779
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 07:48:46AM -0700, Alex Converse wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 1:32 AM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
>> > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 05:19:25PM -0700, Aℓex Converse wrote:
>> >> --- /dev/null
>> >> +++ b/libavcodec/s302m.c
>>
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> This patch allows users to be notified about track switch on a continuous
> audio stream. The A-V statusbar mess up a bit the printing sometimes, I
> don't know how I should handle that. Also, I wonder if there is an
> performance issue
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Aℓex Converse writes:
>
>> From ae62aa2fca3b2cf45a98dc2f9777065bcb452797 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Alex Converse
>> Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:08:26 -0700
>> Subject: [PATCH 3/4] bitstream: Properly promote av_reverse values before
This patch allows users to be notified about track switch on a continuous
audio stream. The A-V statusbar mess up a bit the printing sometimes, I
don't know how I should handle that. Also, I wonder if there is an
performance issue looping on every metadata that often.
Regards,
--
Clément B.
From
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 07:48:46AM -0700, Alex Converse wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 1:32 AM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 05:19:25PM -0700, Aℓex Converse wrote:
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/libavcodec/s302m.c
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
> >> +/*
> >> + * SMPTE 302M decoder
> >
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 1:32 AM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 05:19:25PM -0700, Aℓex Converse wrote:
>> It's a little ugly but without chain demux it isn't something we can
>> do particularly cleanly. This is similar to how we do LATM.
>>
>> Let me know if you think the git metad
Hi,
On 04/27/2011 08:19 PM, Aℓex Converse wrote:
> +frame_size = (h >> 16) & 0x;
> +channels = 2 + 2*((h >> 14) & 0x03);
> +id = (h >> 6) & 0xff;
> +bits = 16 + 4*((h >> 4) & 0x03);
This would be easier to read if aligned. like this:
frame_size = (h >> 16) & 0x;
channe
---
libavcodec/vorbisdec.c | 41 -
1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavcodec/vorbisdec.c b/libavcodec/vorbisdec.c
index a9ddc7d..c70bd75 100644
--- a/libavcodec/vorbisdec.c
+++ b/libavcodec/vorbisdec.c
@@ -247,9 +247,9 @@
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 02:23:59PM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
> On 4/28/11 1:19 PM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> >The number of streams in the Ogg context is well set to 0 but not in the
> >a/v format context, so the number of stream is incremented in
> >av_new_stream and leads to a leak (and maybe worst
On 4/28/11 1:19 PM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
The number of streams in the Ogg context is well set to 0 but not in the
a/v format context, so the number of stream is incremented in
av_new_stream and leads to a leak (and maybe worst). The attached patch
fix this.
Could you please give us more context
Aℓex Converse writes:
> From ae62aa2fca3b2cf45a98dc2f9777065bcb452797 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Alex Converse
> Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:08:26 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH 3/4] bitstream: Properly promote av_reverse values before
> shifting.
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/mixe
Aℓex Converse writes:
> There is most likely a performance hit here but the current code is
> *undefined.*
>
> Haters are welcome to send suggestions on how to do this without an if.
>
> From 554be95192ad9803f51f00fec18bf6db9a562779 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Alex Converse
> Date: Tue, 26
Reinhard Tartler writes:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 03:37:27PM -0400, Justin Ruggles wrote:
>> On 04/27/2011 03:25 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>>
>> > From: Michael Niedermayer
>> >
>> > Reported-at: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 14:38:25 +
>> > Reported-by: Dominic Chell
>> > Signed-off-by: Michael Ni
Luca Barbato writes:
> On 4/28/11 10:20 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> From: Anssi Hannula
>>
>> As per issue2629, most 23.976fps matroska H.264 files are incorrectly
>> detected as 24fps, as the matroska timestamps usually have only
>> millisecond precision.
>>
>> Fix that by doubling the amount
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 01:24:56PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>
> I prefer to always s-o-b patches.
>
> Think of this scenario; a person sends a patch, it is modified by
> somebody else, and then applied. Did the original author agree to
> those changes? If the s-o-b is there, yes, otherwise
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 03:37:27PM -0400, Justin Ruggles wrote:
> On 04/27/2011 03:25 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>
> > From: Michael Niedermayer
> >
> > Reported-at: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 14:38:25 +
> > Reported-by: Dominic Chell
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer
> > (cherry picked from c
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 01:14:17PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 01:24:56PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 03:05:14PM +, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:14:43PM +0300, Martin Storsjö wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > --- a/libavcodec/vorbisdec.c
> > +++ b/libavcodec/vorbisdec.c
> > @@ -753,7 +753,7 @@ static int
> > vorbis_parse_setup_hdr_mappings(vorbis_context *vc)
> >
> > if (mapping_se
"Ronald S. Bultje" writes:
> Yeah it's still interesting, I like this patch a lot more. :-).
I'm glad it's better now, since there aren't other comments yet I send
another version, c-indentation-style had to be c-file-style.
I also added a couple more variables and commented much more.
I tested
The number of streams in the Ogg context is well set to 0 but not in the
a/v format context, so the number of stream is incremented in
av_new_stream and leads to a leak (and maybe worst). The attached patch
fix this.
--
Clément B.
From ec643696bd0bae8221eb5483cecebacc19e8db57 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 01:24:56PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 03:05:14PM +, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Luca Barbato wrote:
> >> > On 4/26/11 4:47 PM, Diego Biurrun w
On 4/28/11 10:20 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
From: Anssi Hannula
As per issue2629, most 23.976fps matroska H.264 files are incorrectly
detected as 24fps, as the matroska timestamps usually have only
millisecond precision.
Fix that by doubling the amount of timestamps inspected for frame rate
fo
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 03:05:14PM +, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Luca Barbato wrote:
>> > On 4/26/11 4:47 PM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
>> >> I am confused whether or not I should signoff patches and/or sig
2011/4/28 Aℓex Converse :
Why don't you use 'git send-email'? Or at least put the patches line.
--
Felipe Contreras
___
libav-devel mailing list
libav-devel@libav.org
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
On 4/22/11 5:17 PM, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
/As you know in h264 videos you can specify any crop values in any
direction; normally only the bottom part is used because 1080 is not
multiple of 16, however Libav supports cropping only partially.
Currently it ignores the left and top values but com
On 4/28/11 9:41 AM, Martin Storsjö wrote:
These should be removed at some point, but they aren't removed yet.
The intent is to be able to recompile an old application against
the new ABI without modifying the code, and this doesn't work
currently.
Ok.
___
On 4/28/11 10:20 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
From: Anssi Hannula
As per issue2629, most 23.976fps matroska H.264 files are incorrectly
detected as 24fps, as the matroska timestamps usually have only
millisecond precision.
Fix that by doubling the amount of timestamps inspected for frame rate
fo
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> ---
> libavcodec/vorbisdec.c |6 +++---
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libavcodec/vorbisdec.c b/libavcodec/vorbisdec.c
> index a9ddc7d..4bd842e 100644
> --- a/libavcodec/vorbisdec.c
> +++ b/libavcodec/vorbisdec.
---
libavcodec/vorbisdec.c |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavcodec/vorbisdec.c b/libavcodec/vorbisdec.c
index a9ddc7d..4bd842e 100644
--- a/libavcodec/vorbisdec.c
+++ b/libavcodec/vorbisdec.c
@@ -735,8 +735,8 @@ static int vorbis_parse_setup_hdr_map
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 05:19:25PM -0700, Aℓex Converse wrote:
> It's a little ugly but without chain demux it isn't something we can
> do particularly cleanly. This is similar to how we do LATM.
>
> Let me know if you think the git metadata should be different.
> Ported-by: Alex Converse
> ---
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 08:35:46AM +0400, Kirill Gavrilov wrote:
> Just notice. I don't think that usage of "class_" name is stupid.
> "class" is a keyword in C++ and you can not use it as a name for variables.
> However while this name appear in source file (.c, not a header, because
> appearing i
From: Anssi Hannula
As per issue2629, most 23.976fps matroska H.264 files are incorrectly
detected as 24fps, as the matroska timestamps usually have only
millisecond precision.
Fix that by doubling the amount of timestamps inspected for frame rate
for streams that have coarse time base. This als
While deprecated, they're totally useless as long as their values
are different from the AVIO_FLAG values that are used internally.
Currently, this leads to old libav applications still compiling
correctly (since we haven't removed the fallback wrappers), but
failing since the functions internally
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Martin Storsjö wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Gil Pedersen wrote:
>
> > Attached patch will allow ff_network_wait_fd() to return when the fd
> > encounters an error or disconnection (HUP). Once returned, the next
> > read/write call on the fd will result in an error and poss
73 matches
Mail list logo
