On 2012-11-26 10:46:27 +0100, Janne Grunau wrote:
> On 2012-11-25 23:10:26 +, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> > Janne Grunau writes:
> >
> > > Although sample count and delta are in ISO 14496-12 specified as
> > > unsigned files exists were interpreting it as signed integer makes
> > > more sense (see
On 2012-11-26 02:31:10 +0100, Luca Barbato wrote:
> On 11/26/2012 12:03 AM, Janne Grunau wrote:
> > Although sample count and delta are in ISO 14496-12 specified as
> > unsigned files exists were interpreting it as signed integer makes
> > more sense (see mp4-negative-stts-problem.mp4).
> > Fixes a
On 2012-11-25 23:10:26 +, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Janne Grunau writes:
>
> > Although sample count and delta are in ISO 14496-12 specified as
> > unsigned files exists were interpreting it as signed integer makes
> > more sense (see mp4-negative-stts-problem.mp4).
>
> Can someone _please_ exp
On 11/26/2012 12:03 AM, Janne Grunau wrote:
> Although sample count and delta are in ISO 14496-12 specified as
> unsigned files exists were interpreting it as signed integer makes
> more sense (see mp4-negative-stts-problem.mp4).
> Fixes an assert caused by negative avg_frame_rate deduced from a
>
Janne Grunau writes:
> Although sample count and delta are in ISO 14496-12 specified as
> unsigned files exists were interpreting it as signed integer makes
> more sense (see mp4-negative-stts-problem.mp4).
Can someone _please_ explain how a negative duration can ever many any
sense at all? Or
Although sample count and delta are in ISO 14496-12 specified as
unsigned files exists were interpreting it as signed integer makes
more sense (see mp4-negative-stts-problem.mp4).
Fixes an assert caused by negative avg_frame_rate deduced from a
negative duratoin computed in mov_read_stts() with the