Hi all,
i just wanted to send a notice to the list about a project still not
very known within the privacy/anonymity/censorship environment that's
called FQRouter: http://fqrouter.com/
That's a novel approach to bypass GFW by using some of the low-level TCP
hacking techniques from Philip Winter
At the local level I see lots of coders with a more or less open
community interest that includes open government and working with
community orgs or residents directly with the coding skills.
So, if you don't have a CfA Brigade in your area, you might want to look
for a RHoK group -
Sorry for cross-posting
---
Now Published:
‘Online Collective Action and Policy Change’ - Special Issue of “Policy and
Internet
Guest Editors:
Andrea Calderaro (European University Institute) and Anastasia Kavada
(University of Westminster)
Abstract
The Internet has multiplied the platforms
- Forwarded message from Rangraj Setlur rang...@gmail.com -
From: Rangraj Setlur rang...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 19:23:33 +0530
To: International Critical Care Medicine Group cc...@list.pitt.edu
Subject: [CCM-L] Scientific Articles Accepted (Personal Checks, Too)-nytimes
From: Nathaniel Poor natp...@gmail.com
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/08/health/for-scientists-an-exploding-world-of-pseudo-academia.html
The scientists who were recruited to appear at a conference called
Entomology-2013 thought they had been selected to make a presentation
to the leading
Indeed, this would be a problem. However, it's already a problem, which
is to say that poorer universities cannot afford subscriptions to EBSCO
and whatnot to begin with, and thus their faculty have trouble keeping
up with research in comparison to those at richer schools. What I'm
suggesting
On 4/8/13 3:21 PM, Calderaro, Andrea wrote:
Sorry for cross-posting
*
*
*---*
*Now Published: *
*'Online Collective Action and Policy Change' - **Special Issue of
Policy and Internet *
*Guest Editors: *
*Andrea Calderaro *(European University Institute) and *Anastasia
Kavada *(University of
The model that most appeals to me at the moment is one that has been
talked about for years by Doug Engelbart and others: Researchers publish
in open access repositories whose costs are modest and can be funded
through grants and institutional cost-sharing. Light moderation classifies
articles
Part of the problem is the use of publications to
drive academic retention, tenure, promotion.
Publications should be vetted by a set of peers
that only allow publication of quality goods. The
journals are supposed to be the gate-keepers and
enforcers of quality. This means that the people trying
I imagine people here might have thoughts about this. Comes from a
Texas-based, civil liberties-oriented blog.
Encryption for cloud communications may best protect Fourth Amendment
rights
via Grits for Breakfast by Gritsforbreakfast on 4/6/13
Oh-dear!
Up to now, I have figured that the Internet revolution was mostly a
good thing...
The shakeup of the news paper industry at first seemed like it might help
to open up Journalism to in some way perhaps more democratic... As I read
here about potential confusion regarding the
If we'd all stop using the verb publish when we really mean endorse,
much conversation on this topic would be clearer.
(Not aimed at anyone here, by the way; just a general observation :-) .)
-Karl
Richard Brooks r...@acm.org writes:
Part of the problem is the use of publications to
drive
12 matches
Mail list logo
