Hello LibTech,
The Open Technology Fund is surveying projects working on next
generation secure email or email-like communication. The purpose of this
survey is to identify potential areas of collaboration, better
understand the trade-offs made by the different projects, and to help
the internet f
Thanks for sharing the projects being funded.
Just out of curiosity, can you disclose the donors/ source of funding of the
secure email support initiative.
Thanks!
Robert
On 2013-11-25, at 12:01 PM, Dan Meredith wrote:
> Hello LibTech,
>
> The Open Technology Fund is surveying projects wor
Heya Robert,
Apologies if the initial email wasn't clear. The purpose is a survey to
map the space. The listed projects are merely projects publicly known to
be developing secure email technology. As such, they have been invited
to volunteer their time to complete the survey. Our commitment is to
First of all thank you for picking up this important topic -
it's the kind of outcome out of the PGP criticism I had hoped
for. Congratulations on the insight and depth of the questions
in the form - looks like a better and more comprehensive survey
than my tentative comparison page. :-)
The reas
carlo von lynX writes:
> Hm, federation is so commonly expected to be the normality that
> any distributed system is filed under "p2p" even if, like Tor, it
> runs on thousands of servers, thus rather distant from what "p2p"
> was supposed to mean. Tor started as P2P, but I think it isn't
> anymor
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 11:06 PM, carlo von lynX
wrote:
> I would add liberte' cables (http://dee.su/cables)
I did fill out the survey, actually — by request, so no idea why
Cables does not appear in the list above. The survey was clearly
composed by a domain expert, so props for the effort, and
Dan Meredith writes:
> OTF is entirely a publicly funded program. Support is given from the US
> Congress in an appropriation bill each year.
So it's funded by extortion ("taxation"). That's the kiss of death!
stealthmail (see .sig below) certainly qualifies for your criteria, but
to accept O
On 11/25/13 16:01, Dan Meredith wrote:
> Hello LibTech,
>
> The Open Technology Fund is surveying projects working on next
> generation secure email or email-like communication. The purpose of this
> survey is to identify potential areas of collaboration, better
> understand the trade-offs made by
>
> I've completed the survey and attached it here.
>
> With Regards, Guido Witmond.
>
Oops, send out to the list, instead of privately.
Please be careful with any information in there. It's toxic, powerful
and highly flammable.
Feel free to discuss part you find interesting, appealing or ap
In the spirit of open collaboration, Daniel Kahn Gillmor and I have
published a specification we're releasing into the public domain. The
introduction is here: http://ritter.vg/blog-uee_email_encryption.html
This is an incremental upgrade to email as it is currently, that doesn't
try to make larg
10 matches
Mail list logo