Le 15/04/13 12:20 PM, Joel Madero a écrit :
Totally understood, when the forum goes live it will add another layer
to the puzzle (although my understanding is this *might* replace ask at
some point.
Just to make this clear, the forums is not going to replace Ask, Ask
replaced the need for a F
I am just filling out a bug and realize the LibreOfficeBox is not in the
list. Should it not be included?
Cheers,
Marc
--
Marc Paré
m...@marcpare.com
http://www.parEntreprise.com
parEntreprise.com Supports OpenDocument Formats (ODF)
parEntreprise.com Supports http://www.LibreOffice.org
_
Hi Kieran
Kieran Peckett wrote
> On XP here - is there a search to limit bugs to XP only?
Are you crazyskeggy in Bugzilla?
I reopened Bug #62089 because I can replicate the bug if I replicate the
submitter's conditions i.e. switch to Windows Classis style under Windows
XP.
Cheers,
Pedro
--
>
> Instead of just cc'ing one guy, is there a way to tag the bug as
> "Windows XP" ? that would then mean that anyone interested in XP bugs
> (not just Kieran) could see that list.
>
I think we should discuss a broader solution on Friday - one idea is
whiteboard status "OS-XP" "OS-7" "OS-8" if t
These ones are just kind of sitting around, we need someone who has
experience with webdav to take a look at them, thanks in advance!
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?list_id=285285&short_desc=webdav&query_format=advanced&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&version=4.0.0.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Joel Madero wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Kieran Peckett
> wrote:
>>
>> On XP here - is there a search to limit bugs to XP only?
+1
> Unfortunately, no. What we can do is when we hit a bug that says bug present
> on XP, we can CC you on it if that
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Kieran Peckett wrote:
> On XP here - is there a search to limit bugs to XP only?
>
>
Unfortunately, no. What we can do is when we hit a bug that says bug
present on XP, we can CC you on it if that's okay?
This list is at least down to Windows only:
https://bugs.
Hi All,
I think this is a completely manageable goal and will help ensure the next
minor release of 4 is free of blockers.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?list_id=285261&query_format=advanced&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&version=4.0.0.0.alpha0%2B%20Master&version=4.0.0.0.alpha1&version=4.0.0.0
>
> Also we don't need a new system for the voting, we already have the
> bugzilla.
>
Currently we don't use bugzilla voting, also it is a big problem if the #1
enhancement request is some crazy request that takes 1000 hours to
implement. The idea is that we limit the poll to enhancements we KNOW
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen <
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 08:18:17PM -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
> > We select 10-15 possible enhancements that can be completed in a
> > reasonably short period of time (within a minor release). We
Hi All,
Our regularly scheduled conference call is happening this Friday at 1300
GMT, feel free to join and listen in, give your input on our QA processes,
etc
Call: Friday, April 19th, 2013
Time: 1300 GMT
Agenda: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2013/April_19
Looks like anot
> I agree that both Ask and QA need more people and need to be more user
> friendly. In addition I think there are questions beings asked and answered
> (in short duplicated) because there are too many channels (mail, forum,
> ask)
> but too little people. I don't have any idea how to improve this.
Hi,
This is my first mail sent to the 'libreoffice-qa' mail-list.
I hope this is the correct method of doing things...
My question is:
What is the difference between bugs posted under 'Writer' section with the
keyword 'FILEOPEN', to bugs in the 'filter and storage' section?
To me - it seems as if
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Petr Mladek wrote:
> Robinson Tryon píše v Pá 12. 04. 2013 v 13:24 -0400:
>> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Petr Mladek wrote:
>
>> Regarding the EOL date, I've mocked-up an example of how we could
>> display it on the wiki page:
>> https://wiki.documentfoundati
Hi qubit (do you prefer Robinson?) and joel
jmadero wrote
>> Together, I think that we can improve both the Ask site and QA, and
>> make the LibreOffice support system a less scary and more responsive
>> experience for our users.
>
> I completely agree with this - perhaps some basic tutorials ar
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 08:18:17PM -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
> We select 10-15 possible enhancements that can be completed in a
> reasonably short period of time (within a minor release). We blog
> about this (I can do this) with a simple poll. We then announce this
> to the user list and make
Robinson Tryon píše v Pá 12. 04. 2013 v 13:24 -0400:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Petr Mladek wrote:
> Regarding the EOL date, I've mocked-up an example of how we could
> display it on the wiki page:
> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Talk:ReleasePlan#Draft:_Adding_EOL_to_the_table
>
>
Any new strings?
Thanks, m.
2013/4/15 Petr Mladek
> Hi,
>
> please note that the commit deadline for 4.0.3.1, aka rc1, is on today,
> April 15, 2013.
>
> The tag and branch libreoffice-4-0-3 is going to be created tomorrow.
> Only commits with 3 reviewers will be allowed for that branch.
>
> S
On Sun, 2013-04-14 at 22:18 -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
> Can someone check this out, confirm & prioritize it - been sitting
> unconfirmed for way too longer. I checked it out but am unsure how to
> confirm it without similar distro. Thanks in advance, trying to tackle
> these older unconfirmed bu
19 matches
Mail list logo
