Hello Markus,
* Markus Duft wrote on Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 09:26:10AM CEST:
>
> Could this break parity support?
We try to ensure that it doesn't happen.
> I know It's not in the tree yet, but I
> still hope, that ralf comes to looking into my patch some day
Yes. My plan is to get Peter's
>
> Peter Rosin skrev:
> > Hi Markus,
> >
>
> Hold on! Since parity is using a $host matching *winnt*, this patch
> doesn't
> affect parity at all.
Yeah, right, i oversaw that :)
>
> > BTW, did you file a copyright assignment?
Sure, now 2 years ago, or so...
Cheers, Markus
> >
> I'm t
Peter Rosin skrev:
Hi Markus,
Markus Duft skrev:
Hi Ralf,
Ralf Wildenhues skrev:
Hi Peter,
So, I guess I'm saying that I'd prefer sticking to:
if test "$GCC" != yes; then
reload_cmds=false
fi
Ok to push?
Could this break parity support? I know It's not in the tree yet,
Hi Markus,
Markus Duft skrev:
Hi Ralf,
Ralf Wildenhues skrev:
Hi Peter,
So, I guess I'm saying that I'd prefer sticking to:
if test "$GCC" != yes; then
reload_cmds=false
fi
Ok to push?
Could this break parity support? I know It's not in the tree yet, but I
still hope, t
>
> Hi Ralf,
>
> Ralf Wildenhues skrev:
> > Hi Peter,
> >
>
> So, I guess I'm saying that I'd prefer sticking to:
> if test "$GCC" != yes; then
>reload_cmds=false
> fi
>
> Ok to push?
Could this break parity support? I know It's not in the tree yet, but I
still hope, that ra
