Re: Lily version operators documentation

2017-02-15 Thread Paul
On 02/15/2017 07:19 AM, Urs Liska wrote: Yes, these are the functions created by LY_DEFINE in C++ files. If I recall correctly there was discussion about auto-documenting "real" Scheme functions too, but I don't know where this went ... David Nalesnik wrote a script for this.

Re: Lily version operators documentation

2017-02-15 Thread David Kastrup
Urs Liska writes: > Am 15. Februar 2017 13:03:55 MEZ schrieb Trevor Daniels : >> >>Urs Liska wrote Wednesday, February 15, 2017 8:04 AM >> >>> Am 14.02.2017 um 18:27 schrieb Trevor Daniels: >>> As these functions are not intended for the usual

Re: Lily version operators documentation

2017-02-15 Thread Urs Liska
Am 15. Februar 2017 13:03:55 MEZ schrieb Trevor Daniels : > >Urs Liska wrote Wednesday, February 15, 2017 8:04 AM > >> Am 14.02.2017 um 18:27 schrieb Trevor Daniels: >> >>> As these functions are not intended for the usual LilyPond user I >>> don't think the NR is suitable,

Re: Lily version operators documentation

2017-02-15 Thread Trevor Daniels
Urs Liska wrote Wednesday, February 15, 2017 8:04 AM > Am 14.02.2017 um 18:27 schrieb Trevor Daniels: > >> As these functions are not intended for the usual LilyPond user I >> don't think the NR is suitable, other than to have them listed in A22. >> Similarly, they will also be listed in the IR

Re: Lily version operators documentation

2017-02-15 Thread David Kastrup
Urs Liska writes: > Am 14.02.2017 um 18:27 schrieb Trevor Daniels: >> Urs Liska wrote Tuesday, February 14, 2017 9:23 AM >> >>> my patch https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5067/ >>> http://codereview.appspot.com/317270043 is currently on countdown. It >>>

Re: Lily version operators documentation

2017-02-15 Thread Urs Liska
Am 14.02.2017 um 18:27 schrieb Trevor Daniels: > Urs Liska wrote Tuesday, February 14, 2017 9:23 AM > >> my patch https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5067/ >> http://codereview.appspot.com/317270043 is currently on countdown. It >> introduces the procedures >> >> - lilypond>? >> -

Re: Lily version operators documentation

2017-02-14 Thread Trevor Daniels
Urs Liska wrote Tuesday, February 14, 2017 9:23 AM > my patch https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5067/ > http://codereview.appspot.com/317270043 is currently on countdown. It > introduces the procedures > > - lilypond>? > - lilypond>=? > - lilypond - lilypond<=? > - lilypond=? > >

Re: Lily version operators documentation

2017-02-14 Thread Dan Eble
On Feb 14, 2017, at 04:23 , Urs Liska wrote: > introduces the procedures > > - lilypond>? [etc.] > comparing a given version to the one currently compiling the document. Adding “version” to the name would be clearer. — Dan

Lily version operators documentation

2017-02-14 Thread Urs Liska
Hi, my patch https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5067/ http://codereview.appspot.com/317270043 is currently on countdown. It introduces the procedures - lilypond>? - lilypond>=? - lilypondhttps://openlilylib.org http://lilypondblog.org